search for: udpsb

...Sb and TCPv4Sb are also > available. Correct, MNPSb is the parent.? We'd only use it if we wanted to create a new protocol like a TCP replacement which I expect is out of scope. My point is that unless the rule was set early, I'd expect to eventually find an oddball client where UDPSb and TCPSb live on different EFI_HANDLEs (but presumably still under an MNPSb). <<< The current code either looks for UDPSb handles (or TCPSb depending on the received bgiud), then it really does not matter if UDPSb and TCPSb are created under different handles. As soon as I get the arra...

>>> > 1) There's not "any" SB protocol present (Elitebook 8460p/2560p) The only solution for these is to use our own stack (likely full TCP/IP like lwIP) and connect to the Net GUID (EFI_SIMPLE_NETWORK_PROTOCOL).? Does the handle for Pxebc contain a Net?? >>> It does contain a Net but there are 2 issues with SNP: 1) The interface is different than

...n UDPv4Sb and TCPv4Sb are also > available. Correct, MNPSb is the parent. We'd only use it if we wanted to create a new protocol like a TCP replacement which I expect is out of scope. My point is that unless the rule was set early, I'd expect to eventually find an oddball client where UDPSb and TCPSb live on different EFI_HANDLEs (but presumably still under an MNPSb). >>>> > > I kept testing my patch and so far it proved to work in a multi-NIC environment: > > I've set a VMware EFI client with 2 NICs connected to the same network, > > using the VM...