Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "uderdefault".
2015 Oct 07
4
UEFI: Failed to load ldlinux.e64/ldlinux.e32
...Per-client quirks are some of the harder ones to test as often times contributors don't have machines affected by these quirks.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Ashish, Shivendra
> <shivendra.ashish at hpe.com> wrote:
>> Still getting error
>>
>> Disable uderdefault address
>
> 1) I'm presuming this is actually "disable UseDefaultAddress"
>
>> Core_udp_sento: udp->configure unsuccessful
>>
>> This message lopping in console
>
> Not entirely surprising (for now) though I'd expect more output than
> just t...
2015 Oct 07
4
UEFI: Failed to load ldlinux.e64/ldlinux.e32
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 2:33 AM, Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 10:27:15PM -0400, Gene Cumm via Syslinux wrote:
>> > On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 4:07 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I have a patch that I think may help your situation of syslinux.efi
>> >> being unable to load
2015 Oct 07
0
UEFI: Failed to load ldlinux.e64/ldlinux.e32
...;
> Thank you in advance. Per-client quirks are some of the harder ones to test as often times contributors don't have machines affected by these quirks.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Ashish, Shivendra
<shivendra.ashish at hpe.com> wrote:
> Still getting error
>
> Disable uderdefault address
1) I'm presuming this is actually "disable UseDefaultAddress"
> Core_udp_sento: udp->configure unsuccessful
>
> This message lopping in console
Not entirely surprising (for now) though I'd expect more output than
just that and the rest of those messages woul...
2015 Oct 09
0
UEFI: Failed to load ldlinux.e64/ldlinux.e32
Gene wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Ashish, Shivendra <shivendra.ashish at hpe.com> wrote:
>> Still getting error
>>
>> Disable uderdefault address
>
> 1) I'm presuming this is actually "disable UseDefaultAddress"
>
>> Core_udp_sento: udp->configure unsuccessful
>>
>> This message lopping in console
>
> Not entirely surprising (for now) though I'd expect more output than
> just...