Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "udefin".
Did you mean:
undefin
2013 Apr 22
3
Udefined method `get_uptime` for Facter::Util::Uptime:Module
Hi,
I''m rookie puppet user and I trying to establish simple Server-Client
connection on configuration:
Server: *Fedora F18*, Puppet 3.1.1 (installed by yum), Ruby 1.8.7
Client: *Debian 6.0.6*, Puppet 3.1.1 (installed by guide<http://shapeshed.com/setting-up-puppet-on-ubuntu-10-04/>),
Ruby 1.8.7
Server sign client certificate with success but now I''m struggle with apply
2011 Nov 02
1
getting devise to return json data when signing out
...gn_out_and_redirect(resource_or_scope)
scope = Devise::Mapping.find_scope!(resource_or_scope)
if Devise.sign_out_all_scopes
sign_out_all_scopes
else
sign_out(scope)
end
return render :json => {:status => :signed_out}
end
I get a "udefined method or variable resource_or_scope". The problem
is if i define this sign_out_and_redirect method in the application
controller, as another forum recommended:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4522069/rails-3-devise-how-to-get-devise-to-respond-with-json
it never gets called when I do:...
2006 Apr 04
2
Error in pcm_wrapper.c release 1.1.12
..."PCM",
0,
4,
&pcm_encoder_init,
&pcm_encoder_destroy,
&pcm_encode,
&pcm_decoder_init,
&pcm_decoder_destroy,
&pcm_decode,
&pcm_encoder_ctl,
&pcm_decoder_ctl,
};
I have 2 errors:
- size of 'struct' is unknow or zero
- udefined symbol pcmmode
Thanks,
Mattia.
2005 Jan 19
1
build klibc with gcc 2.96 fails
...arn if a macro argument is/would be turned into
a string if -tradtional is specified
-Wno-traditional Do not warn about stringification
-Wundef Warn if an undefined macro is used by #if
-Wno-undef Do not warn about testing udefined macros
-Wimport Warn about the use of the #import directive
-Wno-import Do not warn about the use of #import
-Werror Treat all warnings as errors
-Wno-error Do not treat warnings as errors
-Wall Enable a...
2016 Aug 30
2
[RFC] Interprocedural MIR-level outlining pass
...single operator is not worthy to be outlined.
>>
>
>
> Sure.
>
>
>
>> What classes of congruency would be assigned to operands?
>>
>
>
> GVN is not interprocedural, so comparing gvn congruencey results (as
> opposed to functions) between functions is udefined.
>
>
>> The same for both reads of "a" and "b"? If yes, it would be incorrect, as
>> obviously, these two additions are not guaranteed to be semantically
>> equivalent (a's and b's values can be changed in-between).
>>
>
>
>
>&...
2016 Aug 29
2
[RFC] Interprocedural MIR-level outlining pass
Daniel,
I wonder what the NewGVN would generate for the following C code:
int a, b;
int foo() {
return a + b;
}
int bar() {
return a + b;
}
?
Obviously, the expressions would be the same ("value1 + value2"), but a
single operator is not worthy to be outlined. What classes of congruency
would be assigned to operands? The same for both reads of "a" and "b"? If