search for: ucar86

2017-11-30 14:13 GMT+01:00 Suzen, Mehmet <mehmet.suzen at gmail.com>: > On 30 November 2017 at 14:04, I?aki ?car <i.ucar86 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Am I supposed to read every reference on a man page just to know what >> to expect from a function? >> > > If the reference is from John Chamber, you are supposed to read it. As a joke, it's funny. > It is not always possible for...

2017-11-30 13:26 GMT+01:00 Suzen, Mehmet <mehmet.suzen at gmail.com>: > On 30 November 2017 at 11:37, I?aki ?car <i.ucar86 at gmail.com> wrote: >> 2017-11-30 3:14 GMT+01:00 Suzen, Mehmet <mehmet.suzen at gmail.com>: >>> My understanding is that there is no inconsistency. `is` does what it >>> claims, from the documentation: >>> >>> ?is?: With two arguments, tests wheth...

I don't want to return a value, I want to interrupt the computation, that's why I need to re-throw . But before getting back to the user I want to run some cleanup code. G. On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 5:59 PM I?aki ?car <i.ucar86 at gmail.com> wrote: > > El s?b., 28 jul. 2018 a las 18:30, G?bor Cs?rdi > (<csardi.gabor at gmail.com>) escribi?: > > > > Anyone knows a way to re-throw a caught interrupt condition, so that > > it behaves just like the original one? I.e. no error message is &gt...

2017-11-30 3:14 GMT+01:00 Suzen, Mehmet <mehmet.suzen at gmail.com>: > My understanding is that there is no inconsistency. `is` does what it > claims, from the documentation: > > ?is?: With two arguments, tests whether ?object? can be treated as > from ?class2?. > > With one argument, returns all the super-classes of this > object's

2017-11-30 15:54 GMT+01:00 Suzen, Mehmet <mehmet.suzen at gmail.com>: > > > On 30 Nov 2017 14:32, "I?aki ?car" <i.ucar86 at gmail.com> wrote: > >>> >>> Am I supposed to read every reference on a man page just to know what >>> to expect from a function? >>> >> >> If the reference is from John Chamber, you are supposed to read it. > > As a joke, it's funny...

But by statement in the source file, I mean, for knowing during the execution how much time is taking, without having to wait till the end. 2017-12-21 13:06 GMT+01:00 I?aki ?car <i.ucar86 at gmail.com>: > 2017-12-21 12:46 GMT+01:00 Juan Telleria <jtelleriar at gmail.com>: > > Dear R Developers, > > > > Adding to source() base function a Timer which indicates the execution > time > > of the source code would be a very well welcome feature, and...

Thanks, for the explanation. Still, I think this is surprising bahaviour which might be handled better. Best, Peter Am 20.10.2017 9:49 nachm. schrieb "I?aki ?car" <i.ucar86 at gmail.com>: > Hi Peter, > > 2017-10-20 21:33 GMT+02:00 Peter Meissner <retep.meissner at gmail.com>: > > Hey, > > > > I found this - for me - quite surprising and puzzling behaviour of > split(). > > > > > > split(1:11, as.character(1:11)...

Re-sending, since I forgot to include the list, sorry. I'm including r-package-devel too this time, as it seems more appropriate for this list. El 22 ene. 2018 10:11, "I?aki ?car" <i.ucar86 at gmail.com> escribi?: > > > El 22 ene. 2018 8:12, "Ulrich Bodenhofer" <bodenhofer at bioinf.jku.at> > escribi?: > > Dear colleagues, dear members of the R Core Team, > > This was an issue raised by Prof. Brian Ripley and sent privately to all > devel...

...; On 01/22/2018 10:16 AM, I?aki ?car wrote: >> Re-sending, since I forgot to include the list, sorry. I'm including >> r-package-devel too this time, as it seems more appropriate for this >> list. >> >> >> El 22 ene. 2018 10:11, "I?aki ?car" <i.ucar86 at gmail.com >> <mailto:i.ucar86 at gmail.com>> escribi?: >> >> >> >> ??? El 22 ene. 2018 8:12, "Ulrich Bodenhofer" >> ??? <bodenhofer at bioinf.jku.at <mailto:bodenhofer at bioinf.jku.at>> >> escribi?: >> >> ???...

Hi all, Not sure if this belongs to R-devel or R-package-devel. Anyways... Suppose we have objects of class c("foo", "bar"), and there are two S3 methods c.foo, c.bar. In c.foo, I'm trying to modify the dots and forward the dispatch using NextMethod without any success. This is what I've tried so far: c.foo <- function(..., recursive=FALSE) { dots <-

2017-08-11 16:00 GMT+02:00 Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch>: >>>>>> Dmitriy Selivanov <selivanov.dmitriy at gmail.com> >>>>>> on Fri, 11 Aug 2017 17:33:31 +0400 writes: > > > Hi mailing list and R-core. Could someone from R-core please help me to > > create account in bugzilla? I would like to submit issue

.... Best regards, Ulrich On 01/22/2018 10:16 AM, I?aki ?car wrote: > Re-sending, since I forgot to include the list, sorry. I'm including > r-package-devel too this time, as it seems more appropriate for this > list. > > > El 22 ene. 2018 10:11, "I?aki ?car" <i.ucar86 at gmail.com > <mailto:i.ucar86 at gmail.com>> escribi?: > > > > El 22 ene. 2018 8:12, "Ulrich Bodenhofer" > <bodenhofer at bioinf.jku.at <mailto:bodenhofer at bioinf.jku.at>> escribi?: > > Dear colleagues, dear members of the...

...uldn't MALLOC_TRIM_THRESHOLD_ env variable has impact on malloc.trim calls? At the moment seems any value is ignored... 12 ???. 2017 ?. 6:09 ?? ???????????? "Simon Urbanek" < simon.urbanek at r-project.org> ???????: > > > On Aug 11, 2017, at 12:57 PM, I?aki ?car <i.ucar86 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > 2017-08-11 16:00 GMT+02:00 Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch>: > >>>>>>> Dmitriy Selivanov <selivanov.dmitriy at gmail.com> > >>>>>>> on Fri, 11 Aug 2017 17:33:31 +0400 writes: &g...

...g > a factor e.g. > > f <- factor(x, levels=unique(x)) > split(1:11, f) > > This is particularly sensible when writing unit tests. > > Cheers, > H. > >> >> Best, Peter >> >> Am 20.10.2017 9:49 nachm. schrieb "I?aki ?car" <i.ucar86 at gmail.com>: >> >>> Hi Peter, >>> >>> 2017-10-20 21:33 GMT+02:00 Peter Meissner <retep.meissner at gmail.com>: >>>> Hey, >>>> >>>> I found this - for me - quite surprising and puzzling behaviour of >>> split()....

El dom., 5 ago. 2018 a las 6:27, Kenny Bell (<kmbell56 at gmail.com>) escribi?: > > This should more clearly illustrate the issue: > > c(1, 2, 3, 4)[-seq_len(4)] > #> numeric(0) > c(1, 2, 3, 4)[-seq_len(3)] > #> [1] 4 > c(1, 2, 3, 4)[-seq_len(2)] > #> [1] 3 4 > c(1, 2, 3, 4)[-seq_len(1)] > #> [1] 2 3 4 > c(1, 2, 3, 4)[-seq_len(0)] > #>

> On Aug 11, 2017, at 12:57 PM, I?aki ?car <i.ucar86 at gmail.com> wrote: > > 2017-08-11 16:00 GMT+02:00 Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch>: >>>>>>> Dmitriy Selivanov <selivanov.dmitriy at gmail.com> >>>>>>> on Fri, 11 Aug 2017 17:33:31 +0400 writes: >> >>&gt...

...S3 method for `%*%()` that delegates to a custom non-primitive generic, perhaps "matmult" in this case. But since %*% is not an S3 generic, that's not an option. It would help to hear more about the context of the problem. Michael On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 5:44 AM, I?aki ?car <i.ucar86 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to implement the matrix multiplication operator, which is > S4 generic, for an old-style S3 class. The following works as > expected: > > x <- 1:10 > class(x) <- "myClass" > > setOldClass("myClas...

I've set up a repo with a reproducible example of the issue described in my last email: https://github.com/Enchufa2/dispatchS3dots I?aki 2018-02-20 19:33 GMT+01:00 I?aki ?car <i.ucar86 at gmail.com>: > Hi all, > > Not sure if this belongs to R-devel or R-package-devel. Anyways... > > Suppose we have objects of class c("foo", "bar"), and there are two S3 > methods c.foo, c.bar. In c.foo, I'm trying to modify the dots and > forward th...

...re-throw . > But before getting back to the user I want to run some cleanup code. If it is just cleanup you want then a finally clause or on.exit should do, and will cover all form of non-local transfer of control. Best, luke > > G. > On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 5:59 PM I?aki ?car <i.ucar86 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> El s?b., 28 jul. 2018 a las 18:30, G?bor Cs?rdi >> (<csardi.gabor at gmail.com>) escribi?: >>> >>> Anyone knows a way to re-throw a caught interrupt condition, so that >>> it behaves just like the original one? I.e. no...

El mi?., 8 ago. 2018 a las 19:23, Gabe Becker (<becker.gabe at gene.com>) escribi?: > > Actually, I sent that too quickly, I should have let it stew a bit more. > I've changed my mind about the resolution argument I Was trying to make. > There is more information, technically speaking, in the factor with empty > levels. I'm still not convinced that its the right