Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "uc_start".
Did you mean:
cuc_start
2007 Apr 18
5
[patch 0/4] Revised softlockup watchdog improvement patches
Hi Ingo,
This series of patches implements a number of improvements to the
softlockup watchdog and its users.
They are:
1. Make the watchdog ignore stolen time
When running under a hypervisor, the kernel may lose an arbitrary amount
of time as "stolen time". This may cause the softlockup watchdog to
trigger spruiously. Xen and VMI implement sched_clock() as measuring
unstolen time,
2007 Apr 18
5
[patch 0/4] Revised softlockup watchdog improvement patches
Hi Ingo,
This series of patches implements a number of improvements to the
softlockup watchdog and its users.
They are:
1. Make the watchdog ignore stolen time
When running under a hypervisor, the kernel may lose an arbitrary amount
of time as "stolen time". This may cause the softlockup watchdog to
trigger spruiously. Xen and VMI implement sched_clock() as measuring
unstolen time,
2003 Dec 12
0
FAX app again
...o
checking for socket.h... no
....
checking audiofile.h usability... no
checking audiofile.h presence... no
checking for audiofile.h... no
.....
checking for TIFFSetField in -ltiff... no
....
checking for afOpenFile in -laudiofile... no
checking for fftw_create_plan in -lfftw... no
...
checking for uc_Start in -lunicall... no
checking for mfcr2_new in -lmfcr2... no
There is something missing here?
Thanks,
Dan