Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "ubuntukarmic".
2017 Oct 02
2
[EXT] Should we switch to --hash-style=both by default in LLD ?
...stro.IsOpenSUSE() ||
(Distro.IsUbuntu() && Distro >= Distro::UbuntuMaverick))
ExtraOpts.push_back("--hash-style=gnu");
if (Distro.IsDebian() || Distro.IsOpenSUSE() || Distro == Distro::UbuntuLucid ||
Distro == Distro::UbuntuJaunty || Distro == Distro::UbuntuKarmic)
ExtraOpts.push_back("--hash-style=both");
}
Given that several libc implementation supports this in the Linux ecosystem (glibc, musl, uClibc, most likely others) I think lld should provide good defaults by default, instead of relying on what some distro maintainer have hardcoded...
2017 Oct 02
2
Should we switch to --hash-style=both by default in LLD ?
+1 for both table formats. Then we're compatible by default no matter what.
If somebody cares about .o file size, they can explicitly specify their
--hash-style.
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:35 AM, George Rimar via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >> Le 2 oct. 2017 à 14:23, George Rimar <grimar at accesssoftek.com> a écrit
> :
> >>
> >> I