search for: ublock

Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly well know extension signing problem, I cannot use ublock origin. From what I can tell, the latest version of firefox in the updates repository is 60.6.1-1.el7. It looks like Mozilla have just released firefox esr 60.6.2 which should fix the signing issue. (see https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/60.6.2/releasenotes/) Would it be possible for someone...

...ntOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> >> Sent: Wednesday, 8 May, 2019 16:50:20 >> Subject: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage > >> Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly >> well know >> extension signing problem, I cannot use ublock origin. >> >> From what I can tell, the latest version of firefox in the updates >> repository is >> 60.6.1-1.el7. >> It looks like Mozilla have just released firefox esr 60.6.2 which should >> fix the >> signing issue. >> (see https://www.mozilla.org...

On 06/12/2015 12:36 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:22:13PM -0600, jd1008 wrote: >> No Jonathan. >> I mean websites whitelisted and not exposed in the >> whitelist tab. > I'd certainly like to see proof of this claim. > > > Are you sure you're not thinking about Adblock Plus and its "bribe us > and we'll whitelist

cool!! that works for now.. thanks Mark!! On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 11:21 AM mark <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > firefox_repackage via CentOS wrote: > > Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly well > > know extension signing problem, I cannot use ublock origin. > > > > From what I can tell, the latest version of firefox in the updates > > repository is 60.6.1-1.el7. It looks like Mozilla have just released > > firefox esr 60.6.2 which should fix the signing issue. (see > > https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/60.6.2/...

...Don't get me wrong. At work we are running 99% of all desktop activity on > RHEL/CentOS for much more than a decade. > > That's why I'm wondering why such a Firefox breakage has such a low > priority for upstream. Our users are used to Firefox with several add-ons > like uBlock and others. Suddenly having to run it without them is quite a > mess and asks for an immediate fix. I have used CentOS 6 and 7 as workstation core along with EPEL, elrepo and nux ever since v6 was released. It has just got better and better. Then we have the likes of gnome and firefox, seemin...

On 06/12/2015 12:27 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Sat, June 13, 2015 1:22 pm, jd1008 wrote: >> >> On 06/12/2015 12:18 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: >>> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:05:16PM -0600, jd1008 wrote: >>>> Mark, please be aware that noscript has also a whitelist >>>> that is not viewable by the user. >>>> The whitelist tab does NOT

Am 10.05.2019 um 11:12 schrieb Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro>: > > I maintain a desktop oriented repo for CentOS and last I checked a year or so ago, I got over 150k+ unique IPs with yum user agent downloading stuff from it. > > It's a bit anecdotal as perhaps not all are actual desktop users and some users were using multiple IPs (dhcp), but it shows there are quite a few users

...gt; someone who worked at a company that hasn't existed since 2009? > > I get it, you've got some concerns about the security of the web > model. But adjust your tin foil hat, you're picking up Fox News on > that thing. > > For the record, I use NoScript, Ghostery and uBlock, and am happy with > the experience (for the most part). > > I also heavily use Firefox profiles, and only use a completely > separate profile for certain operations, such as online banking. I've > been playing with using the SELinux sandbox program too, but its just > too co...

...> >>>> Sent: Wednesday, 8 May, 2019 16:50:20 >>>> Subject: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage >>> >>>> Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly >>>> well know >>>> extension signing problem, I cannot use ublock origin. >>>> >>>> From what I can tell, the latest version of firefox in the updates >>>> repository is >>>> 60.6.1-1.el7. >>>> It looks like Mozilla have just released firefox esr 60.6.2 which >>>> should >>>> fix...

...ased on your conversations with someone who worked at a company that hasn't existed since 2009? I get it, you've got some concerns about the security of the web model. But adjust your tin foil hat, you're picking up Fox News on that thing. For the record, I use NoScript, Ghostery and uBlock, and am happy with the experience (for the most part). I also heavily use Firefox profiles, and only use a completely separate profile for certain operations, such as online banking. I've been playing with using the SELinux sandbox program too, but its just too convenient to be able to copy-p...

...tos.org> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> > Sent: Wednesday, 8 May, 2019 16:50:20 > Subject: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage > Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly well know > extension signing problem, I cannot use ublock origin. > > From what I can tell, the latest version of firefox in the updates repository is > 60.6.1-1.el7. > It looks like Mozilla have just released firefox esr 60.6.2 which should fix the > signing issue. > (see https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/60.6.2/releasenotes/) >...

firefox_repackage via CentOS wrote: > Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly well > know extension signing problem, I cannot use ublock origin. > > From what I can tell, the latest version of firefox in the updates > repository is 60.6.1-1.el7. It looks like Mozilla have just released > firefox esr 60.6.2 which should fix the signing issue. (see > https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/60.6.2/releasenotes/) <snip&g...

...<centos at centos.org> >>> Sent: Wednesday, 8 May, 2019 16:50:20 >>> Subject: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage >> >>> Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly >>> well know >>> extension signing problem, I cannot use ublock origin. >>> >>> From what I can tell, the latest version of firefox in the updates >>> repository is >>> 60.6.1-1.el7. >>> It looks like Mozilla have just released firefox esr 60.6.2 which should >>> fix the >>> signing issue. >>&...

...eeps brain-splitted :-) Don't get me wrong. At work we are running 99% of all desktop activity on RHEL/CentOS for much more than a decade. That's why I'm wondering why such a Firefox breakage has such a low priority for upstream. Our users are used to Firefox with several add-ons like uBlock and others. Suddenly having to run it without them is quite a mess and asks for an immediate fix. That's what I'm wondering about. Regards, Simon

The currently available fix for Firefox doesn't work with ESR, but there's a temporary fix that works. At least, it's working for me: Go to about:config and set xpinstall.signatures.required to false. The Firefox folks say that a fix for ESR will be coming at some point, but at least this gets things working again in the short term. It's not clear to me if the fixed ESR (when

...g, but MagicSysRQ works). Arguably this is similar to #104448, but I'm using "regular" glibc. There is no particular pattern to when this bug bites - the first time, I had just built icewm, rerun startx, and was evaluating the various themes. Later, I was installing firefox extension ublock-origin. As with the other bug I just raised (105813) I tried using the modesetting Xorg driver instead of nouveau, but the problem occurred again (left it compiling, came back to a frozen xscreensaver). After that I turned off xscreensaver and it has now been up for perhaps 2 hours, but will maybe...