search for: ubiquitously

Hello, This morning, I asked myself if WebRTC could be a viable alternative to softphone deployment. For me, main issue with Softphones is the amount of work needed for installation and configuration. Also, Softphones must be carefully choosen if Deskphone-like quality is expected. Now that WebRTC becomes ubiquitous, it might make sense to trade Softphone features (call history, BLF, ...) for

I''ve been working on a Rails project with one other developer; he was using Test::Unit, and I was using RSpec. That works OK for a while, but obviously it starts causing pain when you have to check in two places to see if a piece of code is properly tested/spec''d, you can''t use TextMate shortcuts to switch back and forth between code and test, you have to duplicate

>>>>>I do not understand.Are we parsing a configuration file and potentially >>starting new TFTP transfers while downloading it? How can we do this on >>a single thread?We cannot stop/resume a TFTP transfer then I cannot >>imagine how to detect an INCLUDE during TFTP transfer N to launch TFTP >>transfer N+1 if TFTP transfer N is not finished yet, all in a

Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Joerg Schilling > <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > >>> > >> Yes, if you mean what is described here as 'the original 4-clause' > >> license, or BSD-old: > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses > > > > Do you like to

...thinking >>> it uses it if available. So even if you do post it on your DNS, how many clients out there are using DANE on their set up? By the time it becomes more than a tiny % and generally useful, it will be in CentOS 8. It >>> also requires certificates to be implemented more ubiquitously than at present - although we do now have affordable solutions, so this one may resolve >>> more quickly. >> > Security and Privacy on the Internet are both severely broken. > > If you read the white papers from when the Internet was first being designed, security was rarely...

On 8/7/2018 5:08 PM, Adi Pircalabu wrote: > - Since you're on dynamic IP at home, set up a VPN tunnel using the > mailserver as server and HTPC as client. OpenVPN is ubiquitous and > widely supported. > - rsync your mailboxes using the tunnel connection. > This way you can back up your entire server, not only the mailboxes. Instead of openvpn, I use openssh. Use compression

I'm in the process of moving from LDA to LMTP (Postfix upstream) prior to a transition off `nix accounts to virtual accounts and am stumped by LMTP reporting ??? dovecot: lmtp(10019, jeff at example.com): Error: Relative home directory paths not supported: 0 LDA does /not /have any problems with PAM or passwd-file passdb/userdb and the ubiquitous definition of ??? mail_location =

On Sep 8, 2015, at 12:26 PM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 8 September 2015 at 19:20, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: >> Youtube has been discussed in the past but we have usually defaulted to >> mainly hosted on llvm.org and then a copy could potentially be on YouTube. I >> would want this to be an official

I recently upgraded to Rails 3, and this error has come up ubiquitously: DEPRECATION WARNING: Base.named_scope has been deprecated, please use Base.scope instead. Any ideas on how to get rid of it? Or should I just wait for something? There''s actually no place in my application where the code "Base.named_scope" exists, so I assume the problem is i...

>> On Jun 21, 2018, at 18:38, Chris Lattner <clattner at nondot.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Jun 21, 2018, at 9:52 AM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> I've been curious for a while whether SmallVectors have the right speed/memory tradeoff. It would be straightforward to shave off a couple of

>>> > Considering any editing/buffering benefits are only marginal (AFAIK) there are not benefits with the current approach.On the other hand the list of potential problems includes: > 1) We cannot use the ubiquitous EFI PXEbc protocol forcing us to rely on the (not always present) EFI Binding Services. > Best,Patrick Speaking utterly ignorantly here... could this switch help

Hi, I'm evaluating the libspeex library for usage in an embedded platform based on an ARM7 TDMI micro (the ubiquitous Atmel AT91SAM7S). In details, I'm trying to use libspeex to encode the audio stream coming into the micro from an I2S channel and saving the encoded audio to an SD card (currently in binary format just to test it decoded back to the I2S channel from the saved file), but

I'm looking for a routine in R to do Blinder-Oaxaca (and related) decompositions. A very nice one has been written (by Jann) for Stata (and I'm evaluating whether I can switch over to R). I'm having a hard time finding any reference in R documentation to this pretty ubiquitous tool (in labour economics) for decomposing differences between two groups into differences in means and

I've tried reporting this to Adobe, but they are remarkably deaf to such an enormous market of free software users. At least as of AR 9.3, including the latest 9.3.1, I have been unable to view or work with the savable fill-in PDFs that I've pulled off the web in the last couple of months. I have no trouble at all with them in my Windows virtual machine, but the Linux version starts up,

I have pushed a new klibc which uses a modern NetBSD-derived ash. The initial port was done by Olaf, and I've mostly applied the chainsaw to it until it was less than 50% larger than the old one. It's still substantially larger, but should also eliminate need for some external binaries like expr and test, which are otherwise ubiquitous for any sensible shell scripts, and perhaps most

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 9:40 AM Carlos Chavez <cursor at telecomab.mx> wrote: > > On 9/26/2018 4:46 AM, Olivier wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > This morning, I asked myself if WebRTC could be a viable alternative > > to softphone deployment. > > > > For me, main issue with Softphones is the amount of work needed for > > installation and

On 26 April 2010 10:49, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > Certainly for languages such as Java, they will make up a surprisingly large > chunk of the loads and stores, and instructions have much mor flexibility in > terms of syntax. On the flip side, it's a lot of plumbing IIRC, and we'd > really need to stick to the very minimal set of operations,

This replaces the build dependency on perl with one on awk which is already used in the build system and is much more ubiquitous than perl --- Makefile.in | 2 +- mkproto.awk | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ mkproto.pl | 48 ------------------------------------------------ 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-) create mode 100644 mkproto.awk delete mode 100644

The rationale given does not seem to square (IMHO) with the ubiquitous practice of having 0- or 1-length array at the end of a struct and then allocating additional elements for it using malloc, or the so-called "struct hack": http://c-faq.com/struct/structhack.html For example: typedef struct { enum inst_type type; unsigned num_ops; struct operand ops[1]; } inst;

On 04/06/2010 09:52 AM, David Greene wrote: > The second problem is the lack of x86-32 testing on Linux. This is only > going to get worse as x86-32 desktops and servers continue to disappear. > > Pretty much the only way you'll get an x86-32 these days is by purchasing an > Atom netbook or laptop. Unfortunately, these kinds of devices don't suit > themselves well to