search for: ual

Hi all, I'm working with Dovecot-1.0.rc19 + dovecot-lda + postfix + quota-maildir plugin When a new email arrives and it's over quota, the client receives this: -------------------------------- The mail system <vvv at ual.es>: Command died with status 89: "/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/deliver" -------------------------------- Reporting-MTA: dns; vvv.ual.es X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 3AA3F280AB X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; zzz at ual.es Arrival-Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 15:00:17 +0100 (CET) Final-Recipient: rfc822;...

...ed as: __has_feature(integrated_assembler) But I agree with others that "integrated assembler" isn't a feature which should be observable in source code. On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>wrote: > On a higher level, there's the quality issue. People should test for > *behaviour* and *standards* not *tools* or *versions*. So, if my code > only works on ARM UAL syntax, I should ifdef UAL, not ifdef > MY_OWN_ASM_VERSION_7.34+. ARM is historically polluted with such > flags, and they've now created the ACLE (ARM C...

...t; But I agree with others that "integrated assembler" isn't a feature which >> should be observable in source code. >> >> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>wrote: >> >>> On a higher level, there's the quality issue. People should test for >>> *behaviour* and *standards* not *tools* or *versions*. So, if my code >>> only works on ARM UAL syntax, I should ifdef UAL, not ifdef >>> MY_OWN_ASM_VERSION_7.34+. ARM is historically polluted with such >>> flags, and they'...

> But I wanted to say is using these binutils I have built a llvm compiler for > our ARM target. That's correct. Mostly because gcc is using pre-UAL ARM assembler syntax and LLVM switched fully to UAL one. Also, UAL is needed for correct Thumb-2 support, etc. So, in short: gcc is generating some subset of ARM assembler and thus gas is bug-free. LLVM generates somehow different subset and this uncovered many bugs inside gas :) > Now our libr...

...d compiler sanity. Adding support for this GNU extension (that ARMCC also seem to support) can: 1. Add multiple representations to the same operation, which is fine when you're converting ASM into binary, but not so much when you're doing the reverse. We have been trying to deprecate pre-UAL and GNU-extensions as much as possible, and this is a move that is supported from most of the ARM LLVM community. The main reason is, as I said, to be able to come to and from ASM, having the same canonical representation. This will make it a lot easier to test the compiler and to avoid silent asm/...

This is required in order to build using the built-in assembler in clang. --- celt/arm/celt_pitch_xcorr_arm.s | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/celt/arm/celt_pitch_xcorr_arm.s b/celt/arm/celt_pitch_xcorr_arm.s index 09917b1..3c4b950 100644 --- a/celt/arm/celt_pitch_xcorr_arm.s +++ b/celt/arm/celt_pitch_xcorr_arm.s @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@

Martin Storsjo wrote: > This is required in order to build using the built-in assembler > in clang. These patches break the gcc build (with "Error: bad instruction"). Documentation I've seen is contradictory on which order ({cond}{size} or {size}{cond}) is correct. If clang really does require the latter, then the arm2gnu.pl translation script will need to be updated

On Sat, 8 Feb 2014, Martin Storsjo wrote: > This is required in order to build using the built-in assembler > in clang. > --- > I squashed the two changes since it would break the normal gcc > build otherwise. > --- > celt/arm/arm2gnu.pl | 2 ++ > celt/arm/celt_pitch_xcorr_arm.s | 18 +++++++++--------- > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

This is required in order to build using the built-in assembler in clang. --- I squashed the two changes since it would break the normal gcc build otherwise. --- celt/arm/arm2gnu.pl | 2 ++ celt/arm/celt_pitch_xcorr_arm.s | 18 +++++++++--------- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/celt/arm/arm2gnu.pl b/celt/arm/arm2gnu.pl index eab42ef..5c24758 100755 ---

Hi all. I search info in the web about how to install skype on centos 6.5, but just exists info about skype with architecture to 32 bit. someone can me explicain, how to install skype for 64 bit architecture , it's possible? thank -- *Atte. Rodrigo Pichi?ual N.* *Ingeniero Administrador de Sistemas Linux* *rodrigo.pichinual at gmail.com <rodrigo.pichinual at gmail.com>* *+56 9 87272971* *@Roodrigo0461* *http://cl.linkedin.com/in/rodrigopichinual <http://cl.linkedin.com/in/rodrigopichinual>*

...ctly where to start so I thought I would bring it up here in case anybody has some suggestions (or wants to implement it themselves :) CC'ing some recent contributors to the llvm arm assembler. gnu as reference: https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs/as/ARM-Opcodes.html#ARM-Opcodes -David -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

...user -ppassword name_db > backups.sql also I make backups just its schema for example mysqldump -u user -ppassword name_db --no-data > backups.sql but now I need a backups incrementals, because the size of DB is very big (500 mb) How to make this? regards -- *Atte. Rodrigo Pichi?ual N.* *Ingeniero Administrador de Sistemas Linux* *rodrigo.pichinual at gmail.com <rodrigo.pichinual at gmail.com>* *+56 9 87272971* *@Roodrigo0461* *http://cl.linkedin.com/in/rodrigopichinual <http://cl.linkedin.com/in/rodrigopichinual>*

...39;ve seen is contradictory on which order ({cond}{size} or > {size}{cond}) is correct. The reason you're finding contradictory information is that there's two syntaxes, the legacy syntax (where arm and thumb instructions have quite different syntaxes) and the new unified syntax (aka UAL, unified assembler language). Most modern tools default to interpreting the source as UAL (see e.g. http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.dui0473j/dom1359731145130.html - the armasm tool defaults to this syntax as well), but gnu binutils defaults to the old syntax unless...

...Renato, Revisiting this one from about a month back, is anyone tracking what GAS assembly compatibility issues remain? If we only need to compile C and C++, things are looking very good, but when you throw handwritten assembly into the mix, not so much. The goal is GAS compatibility, right? Not UAL? Or is there a hope to make both work? Thanks, Greg On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com>wrote: > Hi Greg, > > > At this point, my biggest concern is the quality of the > > ElfStreamer, and I haven't done anything to verify th...

I don't think there is such a document... There isn't a 1:1 compatibility assurance with any syntax, including the UAL and GAS, but there is good compatibility with most of them, focusing more on GAS than any other, though recent changes are making it more in sync with the UAL (as is happening on GAS, too). I think the recommendation is to try it on, throw code that works on other (OSS) ARM assemblers and report a...

...rinters.conf the param "State stopped" by "State Idle" and then it's worked. My question it's, exist any command for enable printer in status disabled without modify the file printers.conf???? pd: excuse me my inglish (I speak spanish) Thanks -- *Atte. Rodrigo Pichi?ual N.* *Ingeniero Inform?tico* *rodrigo.pichinual at gmail.com <rodrigo.pichinual at gmail.com>* *+56 9 87272971*

Hi,all. Since the recent clang(3.2) has an integrated assembler for ARM, but I can't find document about this assembler's syntax, such assembler's directive, pseudo-instruction, (I assumed it follows the ARM Unified Assembly Language in instructions), where can I get such information? Thanks! ashi

Hi Renato, Thanks for the thoughtful reply. Please find my thoughts below. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation From: Renato Golin [mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org] Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 1:11 PM To: David Peixotto Cc: LLVM Dev; Logan Chien; Gabor Ballabas; Rafael Espíndola; Richard Barton; Amara Em...

...ppen in it? # 1.2.11: /etc/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.9-89.0.25.ELsmp i686 Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 8) ext3 log_path: /var/log/dovecot/dovecot.log info_log_path: /var/log/dovecot/dovecot.info protocols: imaps managesieve ssl_cert_file: /etc/httpd/conf/ssl.crt/alboran.ual.es.dovecot_mas_ca.crt ssl_key_file: /etc/httpd/conf/ssl.key/server.key login_dir: /var/run/dovecot/login login_executable(default): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap-login login_executable(imap): /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap-login login_executable(managesieve): /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/managesieve-login ver...

On Oct 25, 2013, at 3:53 PM, David Peixotto <dpeixott at codeaurora.org> wrote: > Hi Renato, Thanks for the thoughtful reply. Please find my thoughts below. > > -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation > > > From: Renato Golin [mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org] > Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 1:11 PM > To: David Peixotto > Cc: LLVM Dev; Logan Chien; Gabor Ballabas; Rafael Espíndol...