search for: uage

First a statistical issue: The survfit routine will produce predicted survival curves for any requested combination of the covariates in the original model. This is not the same thing as an "adjusted" survival curve. Confusion on this is prevalent, however. True adjustment requires a population average over the confounding factors and is closely related to the standardized

Hi, Try: vec1<- "mue#d/sjbijk at ruepvnvbnceiicrpgxkgcyl@keduhqvqi/ubudvxopddpfddgitrynzshzdcwgneyffrkpbxwilwqngrsals#geqmtkcpkp/qecgdfa#uag" library(seqinr) ?res<-lapply(0:4,function(i) lapply(2:5,function(j) splitseq(s2c(gsub("[#@/]","",vec1)),word=j,frame=i))) #or library(stringr) res1<-lapply(0:4,function(i) lapply(2:5,function(j)

Is it possible to specify that certain tables not be cleared on each example. I''ve inherited a project where a good amount of enumerated data is stored in the database (US States, statuses, about 15-20 tables worth. Over all, it''s a reasonable decision that leads to solid production code (acts_as_enumerated is good). This data is read-only and relatively static; any

...backends won't understand your address space mapping. The backends should expose their address spaces that they support, their sizes and their overall semantics. It should be documented just like the calling convention is documented. It is then the job of the frontend to map whatever source language address spaces are used onto the correct address spaces for the target. For example, the AMDIL backend supports multiple address spaces. If your new language has more than 1 address space, then your frontend has to map them to the backend's address spaces at compile time based on the target tri...

...ss space > > mapping. The backends should expose their address spaces that they > > support, their sizes and their overall semantics. It should be > > documented just like the calling convention is documented. It is then > > the job of the frontend to map whatever source language address spaces > > are used onto the correct address spaces for the target. For example, > > the AMDIL backend supports multiple address spaces. If your new > > language has more than 1 address space, then your frontend has to map > > them to the backend's address spaces...

...some target dependences that prevents its usage as is > with another target: this is a good point I haven't taken into account. > > I don't like the idea to "encode" this mapping within the triple known by LLVM: > this would be equivalent to make backends ware of language-specific features, > like the choices of logical address space mapping done by frontends. My > objection is: why if I want to use LLVM as a tool for a "new" language (a "new" > frontend) that uses address spaces I should modify also LLVM to add a new > triple variant...

Hi there, I'm rying to 'turn' an Schunk in an .Rnw file(Xemacs-21.4.13, ESS-5.2.8, R-2.1, miktex-2.4.1705). Has anyone got the isorot package to work with Sweave? JC example test.Rnw: \documentclass[a4paper]{article} \usepackage{Sweave} \usepackage{isorot} \rotdriver{dvips} \clockwise \title{Sweave Example 1} \author{apologies to Friedrich Leisch } \begin{document} \maketitle

...re the IR would have some target dependences that prevents its usage as is with another target: this is a good point I haven't taken into account. I don't like the idea to "encode" this mapping within the triple known by LLVM: this would be equivalent to make backends ware of language-specific features, like the choices of logical address space mapping done by frontends. My objection is: why if I want to use LLVM as a tool for a "new" language (a "new" frontend) that uses address spaces I should modify also LLVM to add a new triple variant to specify my mappi...

...ACCOUNT<o:p></o:p></span></font></span></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><span class=3DEmailStyle19><font size=3D1 = color=3Dblack face=3D"Trebuchet MS"><span lang=3DFR = style=3D'font-size:8.0pt;mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt;mso-ansi-language:FR'>[2002/06/07 12:46:17, 0] rpc_client/cli_login.c:(74)<o:p></o:p></span></font></span></p> <p class=3DMsoNormal><span class=3DEmailStyle19><font size=3D1 = color=3Dblack face=3D"Trebuchet MS"><span lang=3DFR = style=3D'...

...(0x0) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[10]=3072 (0xC00) smb_vwv[11]=59 (0x3B) smb_bcc=3072 [000] 1B 25 2D 31 32 33 34 35 58 40 50 4A 4C 20 45 4E .%-12345 X@PJL EN [010] 54 45 52 20 4C 41 4E 47 55 41 47 45 20 3D 20 50 TER LANG UAGE = P [020] 43 4C 58 4C 0A 29 20 48 50 2D 50 43 4C 20 58 4C CLXL.) H P-PCL XL [030] 3B 31 3B 31 3B 43 6F 6D 6D 65 6E 74 20 43 6F 70 ;1;1;Com ment Cop [040] 79 72 69 67 68 74 20 41 6C 61 64 64 69 6E 20 45 yright A laddin E [050] 6E 74 65 72 70 72 69 73 65 73 20 31 39 39 36 00 nterpris es 1996....

Dear all, we''re currently looking forward to restructure our hardware environment for our datawarehousing product/suite/solution/whatever. We''re currently running the database side on various SF V440''s attached via dual FC to our SAN backend (EMC DMX3) with UFS. The storage system is (obviously in a SAN) shared between many systems. Performance is mediocre in terms

> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --B_3294209241_521622 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I have been unable to find any discussion regarding this issue, but I have been able to reproduce it on two different machines. Both computer are Macs running

Signed-off-by: Scott Seago <sseago at redhat.com> --- AUTHORS | 17 ++++++ README | 10 +++ conf/ovirt-agent | 12 ++++ conf/ovirt-db-omatic | 12 ++++ conf/ovirt-host-browser | 12 ++++