Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "u8d".
Did you mean:
u8
2010 Sep 27
2
[LLVMdev] Vectors in structures
...generates.
Putting them into structures doesn't help because of the type names
being irrelevant, both names become %struct.__simd64_int8_t
%struct.__simd64_int8_t = type { <8 x i8> }
%struct.__simd64_poly8_t = type { <8 x i8> }
%struct.__simd64_uint8_t = type { <8 x i8> }
@u8d = common global %struct.__simd64_int8_t zeroinitializer, align 8
@i8d = common global %struct.__simd64_int8_t zeroinitializer, align 8
@p8d = common global %struct.__simd64_int8_t zeroinitializer, align 8
The difference between uint8x8 and int8x8 is done via 'nsw' (which,
unless it's r...
2010 Sep 27
0
[LLVMdev] Vectors in structures
On Sep 27, 2010, at 2:58 AM, Renato Golin wrote:
> On 22 September 2010 03:43, Bob Wilson <bob.wilson at apple.com> wrote:
>> But regardless they are still structures, right? What does it mean for them to map onto other types? Is the parser supposed to treat them as if they _were_ those other types? If so, I think you need to define a type system for those fundamental vector
2010 Sep 27
0
[LLVMdev] Vectors in structures
...ctures doesn't help because of the type names
> being irrelevant, both names become %struct.__simd64_int8_t
>
> %struct.__simd64_int8_t = type { <8 x i8> }
> %struct.__simd64_poly8_t = type { <8 x i8> }
> %struct.__simd64_uint8_t = type { <8 x i8> }
>
> @u8d = common global %struct.__simd64_int8_t zeroinitializer, align 8
> @i8d = common global %struct.__simd64_int8_t zeroinitializer, align 8
> @p8d = common global %struct.__simd64_int8_t zeroinitializer, align 8
>
> The difference between uint8x8 and int8x8 is done via 'nsw' (whic...
2010 Sep 27
2
[LLVMdev] Vectors in structures
On 22 September 2010 03:43, Bob Wilson <bob.wilson at apple.com> wrote:
> But regardless they are still structures, right? What does it mean for them to map onto other types? Is the parser supposed to treat them as if they _were_ those other types? If so, I think you need to define a type system for those fundamental vector types. I had read those statements to say something about the
2008 Jun 30
4
Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
Hello list.
I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without
modifications.
How did I try it?
Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock )
Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a
rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee
prep-out.log
The build failed at the end:
Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL
Checking