Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "u1eihmx".
2016 Apr 08
2
Kernel 2.6.32-573.22.1.el6.x86_64, higher than usual load
...load.
The servers are being monitored with Zabbix, and there is a clear difference between the older kernel 2.6.32-573.12.1 and the newer 2.6.32-573.12.1.
I can see the problem on both physical and virtual servers.
You can see the Load Average chart here from one of our servers:
http://imgur.com/U1eihMX
The server is pretty much idle all the time, but the load average increased from 0.001 to 0.300 when updated to the new kernel.
Is anyone else seeing the same behavior?
Best Regards,
Johnny Carlsen
________________________________
CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVILEGED: This e-mail and associated content i...
2016 Apr 08
0
Kernel 2.6.32-573.22.1.el6.x86_64, higher than usual load
...ing monitored with Zabbix, and there is a clear difference between the older kernel 2.6.32-573.12.1 and the newer 2.6.32-573.12.1.
>
> I can see the problem on both physical and virtual servers.
>
> You can see the Load Average chart here from one of our servers:
> http://imgur.com/U1eihMX
>
> The server is pretty much idle all the time, but the load average increased from 0.001 to 0.300 when updated to the new kernel.
>
> Is anyone else seeing the same behavior?
This is one of the fixes listed on the errata page:
"Due to prematurely decremented calc_load_task, t...
2016 Apr 08
1
Kernel 2.6.32-573.22.1.el6.x86_64, higher than usual load
...ere is a clear
> difference between the older kernel 2.6.32-573.12.1 and the newer
> 2.6.32-573.12.1.
> >
> > I can see the problem on both physical and virtual servers.
> >
> > You can see the Load Average chart here from one of our servers:
> > http://imgur.com/U1eihMX
> >
> > The server is pretty much idle all the time, but the load average
> increased from 0.001 to 0.300 when updated to the new kernel.
> >
> > Is anyone else seeing the same behavior?
>
> This is one of the fixes listed on the errata page:
>
> "Due to...