search for: tyranical

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "tyranical".

Did you mean: tyrannical
2008 Jul 07
0
[LLVMdev] DEBUG
...mangling it with a prefix is the right way to go. This would >> significantly increase verbosity in the code and would be generally >> detrimental. > > Verbose, yes, but "generally detrimental?" That's a pretty strong statement. More specifically, this impacts the tyranical :) 80 column limit we have: DEBUG(cout << "whatever stuff here" << yeah << "ok"); is much more clear to me than: LLVM_DEBUG(cout << "whatever stuff here" << yeah << "ok"); To be specific, excess wrapp...
2008 Jul 07
2
[LLVMdev] DEBUG
On Monday 07 July 2008 15:36, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, David Greene wrote: > >>> from our IR to LLVM IR. Those files need to include headers from both > >>> LLVM and our compiler components. That is where the DEBUG conflict > >>> happens. > >> > >> Do you need to use both of the debug mechanisms in the same CPP files?
2008 Jul 08
3
[LLVMdev] DEBUG
...ht way to go. This would >>> significantly increase verbosity in the code and would be generally >>> detrimental. >> >> Verbose, yes, but "generally detrimental?" That's a pretty strong >> statement. > > More specifically, this impacts the tyranical :) 80 column limit we > have: > > > DEBUG(cout << "whatever stuff here" << yeah << "ok"); > > is much more clear to me than: > > LLVM_DEBUG(cout << "whatever stuff here" > << yeah << &quo...