Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "tyranical".
Did you mean:
tyrannical
2008 Jul 07
0
[LLVMdev] DEBUG
...mangling it with a prefix is the right way to go. This would
>> significantly increase verbosity in the code and would be generally
>> detrimental.
>
> Verbose, yes, but "generally detrimental?" That's a pretty strong statement.
More specifically, this impacts the tyranical :) 80 column limit we have:
DEBUG(cout << "whatever stuff here" << yeah << "ok");
is much more clear to me than:
LLVM_DEBUG(cout << "whatever stuff here"
<< yeah << "ok");
To be specific, excess wrapp...
2008 Jul 07
2
[LLVMdev] DEBUG
On Monday 07 July 2008 15:36, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, David Greene wrote:
> >>> from our IR to LLVM IR. Those files need to include headers from both
> >>> LLVM and our compiler components. That is where the DEBUG conflict
> >>> happens.
> >>
> >> Do you need to use both of the debug mechanisms in the same CPP files?
2008 Jul 08
3
[LLVMdev] DEBUG
...ht way to go. This would
>>> significantly increase verbosity in the code and would be generally
>>> detrimental.
>>
>> Verbose, yes, but "generally detrimental?" That's a pretty strong
>> statement.
>
> More specifically, this impacts the tyranical :) 80 column limit we
> have:
>
>
> DEBUG(cout << "whatever stuff here" << yeah << "ok");
>
> is much more clear to me than:
>
> LLVM_DEBUG(cout << "whatever stuff here"
> << yeah << &quo...