Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "typevalues".
Did you mean:
typevalue
2010 Oct 06
1
[LLVMdev] Associating types directly with debug metadata?
Pekka Nikander wrote:
>>>> Here is another version of the patch. This one includes also a small patch to llvm-gcc so that it generates the type metadata for structures and classes. This one also generates and parses correctly the metadata for .ll files. No .bc support yet. The biggest problem with this version is that it breaks when the compiler/linker performs type reductions, and
2010 Sep 30
0
[LLVMdev] Associating types directly with debug metadata?
>>>> We want to avoid any Type class modification. Instead you can use pair in named metadata to match metadata with type.
>>>>
>>
>> I thought about that more, and I think the "right" way would be to have a syntax like
>>
>> !21 = metadata !{ type %struct.T, metadata !11 }
>>
>> or perhaps
>>
>> !21 = metadata
2010 Sep 30
3
[LLVMdev] Associating types directly with debug metadata?
On Sep 30, 2010, at 1:30 AM, Pekka Nikander wrote:
>>>> Would the right starting point be to simply add an MDNode pointer to the Type class? That should be then convertible to a DIType?
>>>
>>> We want to avoid any Type class modification. Instead you can use pair in named metadata to match metadata with type.
>>>
>>> !11 = metadata !{i32
2010 Oct 05
2
[LLVMdev] Associating types directly with debug metadata?
>>> I thought about that more, and I think the "right" way would be to have a syntax like
>>>
>>> !21 = metadata !{ typeval %struct.T, metadata !11 }
>>>
>>> to avoid the problem with the keyword 'type'.
>>>
>
> Anyway, I already implemented an early patch for making Types representable as Values. For that I created
2010 Oct 06
0
[LLVMdev] Associating types directly with debug metadata?
>>> Here is another version of the patch. This one includes also a small patch to llvm-gcc so that it generates the type metadata for structures and classes. This one also generates and parses correctly the metadata for .ll files. No .bc support yet. The biggest problem with this version is that it breaks when the compiler/linker performs type reductions, and I don't understand
2010 Oct 06
2
[LLVMdev] Associating types directly with debug metadata?
On Oct 5, 2010, at 11:23 PM, Nick Lewycky wrote:
>>
>> Here is another version of the patch. This one includes also a small patch to llvm-gcc so that it generates the type metadata for structures and classes. This one also generates and parses correctly the metadata for .ll files. No .bc support yet. The biggest problem with this version is that it breaks when the compiler/linker
2023 Apr 04
5
[RFC PATCH 0/5] fstests specific MAINTAINERS file
I think I might be mad to include that many mailing lists in this patchset...
As I explained in [PATCH 1/5], fstests covers more and more fs testing
thing, so we always get help from fs specific mailing list, due to they
learn about their features and bugs more. Besides that, some folks help
to review patches (relevant with them) more often. So I'd like to bring
in the similar way of
2010 Oct 06
0
[LLVMdev] Associating types directly with debug metadata?
Pekka Nikander wrote:
>>>> I thought about that more, and I think the "right" way would be to have a syntax like
>>>>
>>>> !21 = metadata !{ typeval %struct.T, metadata !11 }
>>>>
>>>> to avoid the problem with the keyword 'type'.
>>>>
>>
>> Anyway, I already implemented an early patch for making