Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "typetyid".
Did you mean:
typeid
2004 Aug 16
2
[LLVMdev] Bytecode file bugs / doc bugs
Dear Reid and Chris,
I thought I should send this to the list in case anyone else is struggling
to interpret bytecode files with the new docs.
(1) First a bug I already mentioned to Reid. Unlike the other new
module headers module 0x01 still uses the old 32-bit and 32-bit format
instead of the new 5-bit and 27-bit format. Thus the first module in the
file will be 0x00000001 followed by
2004 Aug 17
2
[LLVMdev] Re: Bytecodes & docs
...>
>This is probably a result of the "Type != Value" change that happened in
>1.3. In 1.2, we had (in Type.h):
Yes. This was one of those items that was buried back in the upgrade
section. Lazy skimmers like myself will get confused and ask about this.
>DoubleTyID = 11
>TypeTyID = 12
>LabelTyID = 13
>FunctionTyID = 14
>
>We now have:
>DoubleTyID = 11
>LabelTyID = 12
>FunctionTyID = 13
>
>So, we eliminated TypeTyID (one of the main points of the change was to
>get rid of this) and shifted down the values higher than it was before.
>So, the n...