search for: typeids

.... we could do the following >>>>> for “main” from the above example when printing the IR definition (note the >>>>> “^3” at the end):define dso_local i32 @main() #0 !dbg !17 ^3 {For CFI data >>>>> structures, the format would be similar. It appears that TypeIds are >>>>> referred to by string name in the top level TypeIdMap (std::map indexed by >>>>> std::string type identifier), whereas they are referenced by GUID within >>>>> the FunctionSummary class (i.e. the TypeTests vector and the VFuncId >>>&gt...

...writer. I.e. we could do the following >>>> for “main” from the above example when printing the IR definition (note the >>>> “^3” at the end):define dso_local i32 @main() #0 !dbg !17 ^3 {For CFI data >>>> structures, the format would be similar. It appears that TypeIds are >>>> referred to by string name in the top level TypeIdMap (std::map indexed by >>>> std::string type identifier), whereas they are referenced by GUID within >>>> the FunctionSummary class (i.e. the TypeTests vector and the VFuncId >>>> structure)...

On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 04:28:13PM +0800, Wangnan (F) wrote: > > It doesn't work for me at first since in my llvm there's only > llvm.bpf.load.*. > > I think llvm.bpf.store.* belone to some patches you haven't posted yet? nope. only loads have special instructions ld_abs/ld_ind which are represented by these intrinsics. stores, so far, are done via single

This is for BPF output. BPF program output bytes to perf through a tracepoint. For decoding such data, we need a way to describe the format of the buffer. This patch is a try which gives each variable a unique number by introducing a new intrinsic 'llvm.typeid.for'. At the bottom is an example of using that intrinsic and the result of $ clang -target bpf -O2 -c -S ./test_typeid.c

On Sep 30, 2011, at 3:04 PM, Somorjai, Akos wrote: > Thanks! Yes, we are trying to avoid that situation as much as possible. > > Is there any compiler/linker/static analyzer option that would point out those problems (in 13 million lines, large part of that being legacy code)? There's a -Wweak-vtables which will point out a lot of these cases. I have to warn you that in previous

On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 22:00 -0800, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Dec 6, 2006, at 10:44 AM, Andrew Lenharth wrote: > > > Currently, Structure layout is left to targets, which implement them > > according to the ABI of that platform. While this is fine for most > > structures, it makes packed structures very ugly. All fields in a > > packed type must be converted to byte

...o the following >>>>>> for “main” from the above example when printing the IR definition (note the >>>>>> “^3” at the end):define dso_local i32 @main() #0 !dbg !17 ^3 {For CFI data >>>>>> structures, the format would be similar. It appears that TypeIds are >>>>>> referred to by string name in the top level TypeIdMap (std::map indexed by >>>>>> std::string type identifier), whereas they are referenced by GUID within >>>>>> the FunctionSummary class (i.e. the TypeTests vector and the VFuncId &gt...

Hi, I have some problem to install RMySQL package. Could you help me? I set up the path. [root at ep2 library]# export PKG_CPPFLAGS="-I/var/lib/mysql" [root at ep2 library]# export PKG_LIBS="-L/var/lib/mysql - lmysqlclient" [root at ep2 library]# R CMD INSTALL /home/younko/RMySQL_0.5- 5.tar.gz I got this bunch of error message. Please help me. * Installing *source*

Hi John, >> Inlining >> -------- >> >> Many a plausible seeming exception handling scheme has fallen by the way-side >> because it interacts poorly with inlining. >> >> Here is how inlining would work with this scheme. It's pretty close to how >> it works right now. Suppose you have >> >> invoke void @foo() >>

On Dec 1, 2010, at 1:37 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Inlining > -------- > > Many a plausible seeming exception handling scheme has fallen by the way-side > because it interacts poorly with inlining. > > Here is how inlining would work with this scheme. It's pretty close to how > it works right now. Suppose you have > > invoke void @foo() > to

Thanks! Yes, we are trying to avoid that situation as much as possible. Is there any compiler/linker/static analyzer option that would point out those problems (in 13 million lines, large part of that being legacy code)? Currently I don't know any better way than runtime logging and asserting. Also, what shall we do we external source libraries (like Teigha from Open Design Alliance), where

...ing >>>>>>> for “main” from the above example when printing the IR definition (note the >>>>>>> “^3” at the end):define dso_local i32 @main() #0 !dbg !17 ^3 {For CFI data >>>>>>> structures, the format would be similar. It appears that TypeIds are >>>>>>> referred to by string name in the top level TypeIdMap (std::map indexed by >>>>>>> std::string type identifier), whereas they are referenced by GUID within >>>>>>> the FunctionSummary class (i.e. the TypeTests vector and the...

Thanks, John. I'll experiment with both the warning and the nm-weak external tool, and let you know the results. Best, Akos From: John McCall <rjmccall at apple.com<mailto:rjmccall at apple.com>> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 15:24:33 -0700 To: Ákos Somorjai <asomorjai at graphisoft.com<mailto:asomorjai at graphisoft.com>> Cc: "llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu<mailto:llvmdev

...>>>> for “main” from the above example when printing the IR definition (note the >>>>>>>>> “^3” at the end):define dso_local i32 @main() #0 !dbg !17 ^3 {For CFI data >>>>>>>>> structures, the format would be similar. It appears that TypeIds are >>>>>>>>> referred to by string name in the top level TypeIdMap (std::map indexed by >>>>>>>>> std::string type identifier), whereas they are referenced by GUID within >>>>>>>>> the FunctionSummary class (i.e. the...

...>>>>>> for “main” from the above example when printing the IR definition (note the >>>>>>>> “^3” at the end):define dso_local i32 @main() #0 !dbg !17 ^3 {For CFI data >>>>>>>> structures, the format would be similar. It appears that TypeIds are >>>>>>>> referred to by string name in the top level TypeIdMap (std::map indexed by >>>>>>>> std::string type identifier), whereas they are referenced by GUID within >>>>>>>> the FunctionSummary class (i.e. the TypeTests ve...

...>> for “main” from the above example when printing the IR definition (note the >>>>>>>>>> “^3” at the end):define dso_local i32 @main() #0 !dbg !17 ^3 {For CFI data >>>>>>>>>> structures, the format would be similar. It appears that TypeIds are >>>>>>>>>> referred to by string name in the top level TypeIdMap (std::map indexed by >>>>>>>>>> std::string type identifier), whereas they are referenced by GUID within >>>>>>>>>> the FunctionSummary clas...

...he assembly writer. I.e. we could do the following for “main” from the above example when printing the IR definition (note the “^3” at the end): >> >> define dso_local i32 @main() #0 !dbg !17 ^3 { >> >> For CFI data structures, the format would be similar. It appears that TypeIds are referred to by string name in the top level TypeIdMap (std::map indexed by std::string type identifier), whereas they are referenced by GUID within the FunctionSummary class (i.e. the TypeTests vector and the VFuncId structure). For the LLVM assembly I think there should be a top level entry fo...

...the Module in the assembly writer. I.e. we could do the following for “main” from the above example when printing the IR definition (note the “^3” at the end): > > define dso_local i32 @main() #0 !dbg !17 ^3 { > > For CFI data structures, the format would be similar. It appears that TypeIds are referred to by string name in the top level TypeIdMap (std::map indexed by std::string type identifier), whereas they are referenced by GUID within the FunctionSummary class (i.e. the TypeTests vector and the VFuncId structure). For the LLVM assembly I think there should be a top level entry fo...

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106391 Bug ID: 106391 Summary: Noveau fails to compile when using meson and LLVM without RTTI Product: Mesa Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component:

I have a compiler transform that I have been working on that produces bytecode that passes the verifier. However, when I try to read that bytecode back in, I get the assertion failure below. llvm::BytecodeReader::ParseConstantPoolValue(unsigned int): Assertion `(!isa<Constant>(Result) || !cast<Constant>(Result)->isNullValue()) || !hasImplicitNull(TypeID) &&