search for: typei

Hi, list, suppose i have such a data frame: trash <- data.frame(cbind(seq(1:5),c('a','a','b','a','b'),c('b','a','b','b','a'))) names(trash) <- c('age','typeI','typeII') and I want to change all 'a's to be 0 and 'b's to be 1. temp <- as.matrix(trash) temp[temp=='a'] <- 0 temp[temp=='b'] <- 1 temp <- data.frame(temp) the problem was that temp$typeI and temp$typeII were still factors, whereas I w...

Hi all, I have been struggling with ANOVAs on R. I am new to R, so I created a simple data frame, and I do some analyses on R just to learn R and then check them on SPSS to make sure that I am doing fine. Here is the problem that I've run into: when we use the aov function, it uses SS Type I as default (on SPSS it is Type III). Then I used the Anova function under cars package using the

...#include "nouveau_drv.h" #include "nouveau_gem.h" @@ -265,7 +265,6 @@ nouveau_ttm_init(struct nouveau_drm *drm) struct nvkm_pci *pci = device->pci; struct nvif_mmu *mmu = &drm->client.mmu; struct drm_device *dev = drm->dev; - bool need_swiotlb = false; int typei, ret; ret = nouveau_ttm_init_host(drm, 0); @@ -300,13 +299,10 @@ nouveau_ttm_init(struct nouveau_drm *drm) drm->agp.cma = pci->agp.cma; } -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SWIOTLB) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86) - need_swiotlb = is_swiotlb_active(dev->dev); -#endif - ret = ttm_device_...

...um - probably incomplete) one needs to take: 1. Create a new class in the hierarchy 2. Implement two forms of MD_NODE_GET 3. Specialize MDNodeKeyImpl 4. Modify LLParser.cpp and add serialization code for your special type 5. Modify AsmWriter.cpp and add serialization code for your special typeI believe we can accomplish everything needed for debug info with just step 1 using a pattern found in Boost Serialization. Imagine a new API based on this concept: class DIMyFancyType : public MDNode { StringRef FileName; template<typename Visitor> void visit(Visitor & v) { DINode::visit...

Hi all, I have been trying to calculate Type III SS in R for an unbalanced two-way anova. However, the Type III SS are lower for the first factor compared to type I but higher for the second factor (see below). I have the impression that Type III are always lower than Type I - is that right? And a clarification about how to fit Type III SS. Fitting model<-aov(y~a*b) in the base package and

Hi all, this little series removes the last swiotlb API exposed to modules. Diffstat: arch/x86/include/asm/xen/swiotlb-xen.h | 6 ------ arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c | 28 ++++------------------------ drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c | 10 +++------- drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c | 6 ------ kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 1 - 5 files changed, 7

Hi folks, Currently, when the device is removed (or the driver is unbound) the nouveau_drm structure de-allocated. However, it's still accessible from and used by some DRM layer callbacks. For example, file handles can be closed after the device has been removed (physically or otherwise). This series converts the Nouveau device structure to be allocated and de-allocated with the

Hi guys, Well let's face it AGP is a total headache to maintain and dead for at least 10+ years. We have a lot of x86 specific stuff in the architecture independent graphics memory management to get the caching right, abusing the DMA API on multiple occasions, need to distinct between AGP and driver specific page tables etc etc... So the idea here is to just go ahead and remove the support