Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4051 matches for "typedeffing".
Did you mean:
typedef'ing
2015 Jun 03
5
[PATCH 1/1] Updated opus_types.h to correctly support 8 and 64 bit types.
- Replaced blanket #define of 8 & 64 bit types with typedefs for each
platform to match 16 & 32 bit types.
- Updated existing typedefs for each platform to fix odd values and
improve consistency.
---
include/opus_types.h | 125 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 100 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/opus_types.h
2009 Jan 08
1
[LLVMdev] Integer typedefs for MSVC
LLVM's typedefs for int32_t etc. under MSVC (in Support/DataTypes.h)
conflict with those used by other third-party libraries. Instead of these:
#ifdef _MSC_VER
typedef __int64 int64_t;
typedef unsigned __int64 uint64_t;
typedef signed int int32_t;
typedef unsigned int uint32_t;
typedef short int16_t;
typedef unsigned short uint16_t;
typedef signed char int8_t;
typedef unsigned char uint8_t;
2017 Jan 16
4
[RFC 0/2] Propose a new pointer trait.
Hi,
I'm part of an engineering team doing research on persistent memory support and
we have stumbled upon an interesting problem. The issue is, we would like to be
able to use the standard library containers in a persistent memory context
(think NVDIMM-N). What I mean is that you allocate a container from said
memory, use it like you normally would. After the application terminates,
expectedly
2016 Dec 15
6
[PATCH 0/8] enable endian checks for all sparse builds
This is just a reposting of the patch that enables endian checks, with addition
of trivial patches that drop __bitwise__ and __CHECK_ENDIAN__ everywhere.
I plan to include this in my pull request unless I hear otherwise.
Michael S. Tsirkin (8):
linux/types.h: enable endian checks for all sparse builds
tools: enable endian checks for all sparse builds
Documentation/sparse: drop __bitwise__
2016 Dec 15
6
[PATCH 0/8] enable endian checks for all sparse builds
This is just a reposting of the patch that enables endian checks, with addition
of trivial patches that drop __bitwise__ and __CHECK_ENDIAN__ everywhere.
I plan to include this in my pull request unless I hear otherwise.
Michael S. Tsirkin (8):
linux/types.h: enable endian checks for all sparse builds
tools: enable endian checks for all sparse builds
Documentation/sparse: drop __bitwise__
2016 Dec 15
0
[PATCH 5/8] linux: drop __bitwise__ everywhere
__bitwise__ used to mean "yes, please enable sparse checks
unconditionally", but now that we dropped __CHECK_ENDIAN__
__bitwise is exactly the same.
There aren't many users, replace it by __bitwise everywhere.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
---
arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/gpio-cfg.h | 2 +-
drivers/md/dm-cache-block-types.h | 6
2013 Jun 14
1
[Trivial PATCH 00/33] Remove uses of typedef ctl_table
It''s clearer to use struct ctl_table instead
Joe Perches (33):
arm: kernel: isa: Convert use of typedef ctl_table to struct ctl_table
frv: Convert use of typedef ctl_table to struct ctl_table
ia64: crash: Convert use of typedef ctl_table to struct ctl_table
mips: lasat: sysctl: Convert use of typedef ctl_table to struct ctl_table
powerpc: idle: Convert use of typedef ctl_table
2017 May 05
1
[PATCH v10 4/6] mm: function to offer a page block on the free list
Hi Wei,
[auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
[also build test WARNING on v4.11 next-20170504]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Wei-Wang/Extend-virtio-balloon-for-fast-de-inflating-fast-live-migration/20170505-052958
reproduce: make htmldocs
All warnings (new ones prefixed by
2017 May 05
1
[PATCH v10 4/6] mm: function to offer a page block on the free list
Hi Wei,
[auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
[also build test WARNING on v4.11 next-20170504]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Wei-Wang/Extend-virtio-balloon-for-fast-de-inflating-fast-live-migration/20170505-052958
reproduce: make htmldocs
All warnings (new ones prefixed by
2012 Feb 09
2
[PATCH] Remove even more CPP hackery
> Dave Yeo wrote:
>> Yes that makes sense. Requiring a C99 compliant compiler seems quite
reasonable.
> Well I'm actually going to be even more reasonable than that. The only
bits of C99 that flac will really require is header file
> with C99 standard width integers (int8_t, uint8_t, int16_t etc). Erik
I would recommend including with the distribution a file for windows
2008 Jun 04
1
Splus/R typedef for C equivalent of S "integer"
We've been working on making it easier to write
packages that work in both R and Splus. One issue
is that R and Splus use different internal representations
of integers and this makes a difference on their 64-bit
versions: R uses ints (32 bits on 32-bit and 64-bit versions
of R) and Splus uses longs (32 bits on 32-bit Splus and
64 bits on 64-bit Splus). The obvious ways to deal with
the
2009 Jun 10
3
package installation fails (RandomFields)
I have been unable to install the package RandomFields. I am using R
2.9.0-4 on Ubuntu 9.04.
To install, I use the command:
sudo R CMD INSTALL RandomFields_1.3.37.tar.gz
The output follows below. Any help Would be appreciated.
D. Hoysak
Brandon University
* Installing to library ?/usr/local/lib/R/site-library?
* Installing *source* package ?RandomFields? ...
** libs
g++
2009 Jun 10
3
package installation fails (RandomFields)
I have been unable to install the package RandomFields. I am using R
2.9.0-4 on Ubuntu 9.04.
To install, I use the command:
sudo R CMD INSTALL RandomFields_1.3.37.tar.gz
The output follows below. Any help Would be appreciated.
D. Hoysak
Brandon University
* Installing to library ?/usr/local/lib/R/site-library?
* Installing *source* package ?RandomFields? ...
** libs
g++
2017 Jan 10
2
[cfe-dev] Modernizing LLVM Coding Style Guide and enforcing Clang-tidy
2017-01-10 0:06 GMT+01:00 David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>:
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:59 PM Sanjoy Das via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sorry I fat fingered an earlier send in the previous email. I was
>> trying to say:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Sanjoy Das
>> <sanjoy at
2002 Dec 10
2
mingw compiling problem for libogg
(i hope this is correct m.list)
Hi,
there is a small compiling problem for mingw
when compiling on libogg..
in include/ogg/os_types.h :
ogg_int64_t, ogg_int32_t, etc are defined
correctly on cygwin and MSVC/Borland
but not on mingw...
i have attached a patch that will fix
this problem (i hope it attaches
correctly)
thx, Nehal
--- os_types.h.old Fri Jul 19 02:25:52 2002
+++ os_types.h Tue
2012 Feb 09
1
[PATCH] Remove even more CPP hackery
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 09.02.2012 21:41, Ben Allison wrote:
>>> Dave Yeo wrote:
>>>> Yes that makes sense. Requiring a C99 compliant compiler
>>>> seems quite
>> reasonable.
>>> Well I'm actually going to be even more reasonable than that.
>>> The only
>> bits of C99 that flac will really require is
2017 Jan 09
3
[cfe-dev] Modernizing LLVM Coding Style Guide and enforcing Clang-tidy
Hi,
Sorry I fat fingered an earlier send in the previous email. I was
trying to say:
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Sanjoy Das
<sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote:
>> +1 Exactly this.
>> I don't think C programmer will not understand using. The "=" makes it much
>> simpler to read, even if it is the first time you see it, which is not the
>>
2016 Dec 27
3
Definition of uintptr_t in Rinterface.h
Hi,
I was recently pointed out that a definition in Rinterface.h can be conflicting
with a definition in stdint.h:
/usr/include/R/Rinterface.h has:
typedef unsigned long uintptr_t;
/usr/include/stdint.h has:
typedef unsigned int uintptr_t;
(when 32bit platform complete definition is:
#if __WORDSIZE == 64
# ifndef __intptr_t_defined
typedef long int intptr_t;
# define
2016 Sep 08
4
typedef or using in C++ code
> On Sep 7, 2016, at 4:50 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 04:30:01PM -0700, Eugene Zelenko via llvm-dev wrote:
>> What should be used for type declarations: typedef or using? typedef
>> is there because of historical reasons, but LLVM code based is C++11
>> now.
>>
>> LLVM Coding
2006 Nov 23
0
[751] trunk/wxruby2/swig/typedefs.i: Added wxUint32 typedef
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /><style type="text/css"><!--
#msg dl { border: 1px #006 solid; background: #369; padding: