Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "typechek".
Did you mean:
typecheck
2015 Oct 22
2
The future of LLVM's C APIs: Notes and BoF.
...s cases that ca be added. I can prepare a patch if people want
these).
- Read IR, so I can do transformations.
- Codegen to object files
- JIT (using MCJIT is fine, Orca would be better but making a good C api
for it may prove challenging).
I preferably would like that the ABI is not broken, as typecheking won't
work cross language boundary. That being said, I'm ok with this being a
"best practice" or whatever people want to call it rather than a strong,
enforced, requirement. However, if it is not a strong, enforced
requirement, we need a way to test what versions of LLVM is cur...
2015 Oct 17
3
The future of LLVM's C APIs: Notes and BoF.
(Moving this to llvm-dev)
On Friday, October 16, 2015, Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com> wrote:
> Some users of llvm-c want stable API interfaces into various parts of
> the LLVM infrasture, others want further ABI guarantees about this
> usage, and still others simply want a way to bind to LLVM through their
> language frontend’s existing FFI support for C.
>
> If