Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "type_size_in_bit".
Did you mean:
type_size_in_bits
2011 Feb 24
4
[LLVMdev] DIFactory interface is going away
...Here is one example that demonstrates differences between two interfaces. To create debug information entries to encode volatile type one would use following call in a language front end,
CreateDerivedType(DW_TAG_volatile_type, Context, StringRef(), File,
0 /*line no*/, type_size_in_bits, type_align_in_bits,
0 /* offset */, 0 /* flags */, OriginalType);
using DIFactory interface. Now, DIBuilder allows you to do the same using following call.
createQualifiedType(DW_TAG_volatile_type, OriginalType);
DIBuilder interface was introduced in Nov/Dec last ye...
2011 Feb 24
0
[LLVMdev] DIFactory interface is going away
...le that demonstrates differences between two interfaces. To
> create debug information entries to encode volatile type one would use
> following call in a language front end,
> CreateDerivedType(DW_TAG_volatile_type, Context, StringRef(), File,
> 0 /*line no*/, type_size_in_bits,
> type_align_in_bits,
> 0 /* offset */, 0 /* flags */, OriginalType);
> using DIFactory interface. Now, DIBuilder allows you to do the same using
> following call.
> createQualifiedType(DW_TAG_volatile_type, OriginalType);
> DIBuilder interface was intr...
2011 Feb 25
2
[LLVMdev] DIFactory interface is going away
...tes differences between two interfaces. To
>> create debug information entries to encode volatile type one would use
>> following call in a language front end,
>> CreateDerivedType(DW_TAG_volatile_type, Context, StringRef(), File,
>> 0 /*line no*/, type_size_in_bits,
>> type_align_in_bits,
>> 0 /* offset */, 0 /* flags */, OriginalType);
>> using DIFactory interface. Now, DIBuilder allows you to do the same using
>> following call.
>> createQualifiedType(DW_TAG_volatile_type, OriginalType);
>> DIB...