Displaying 20 results from an estimated 24 matches for "tx_waitq".
2019 Sep 25
2
[PATCH v2 03/27] drm/dp_mst: Destroy MSTBs asynchronously
...stb->tx_slots[1]->state = DRM_DP_SIDEBAND_TX_TIMEOUT;
> - mstb->tx_slots[1] = NULL;
> - wake_tx = true;
> - }
> - mutex_unlock(&mstb->mgr->qlock);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mstb->destroy_next);
>
> - if (wake_tx)
> - wake_up_all(&mstb->mgr->tx_waitq);
> -
> - drm_dp_mst_put_mstb_malloc(mstb);
> + /*
> + * This can get called under mgr->mutex, so we need to perform the
> + * actual destruction of the mstb in another worker
> + */
> + mutex_lock(&mgr->delayed_destroy_lock);
> + list_add(&mstb->destroy_...
2019 Sep 27
1
[PATCH v2 03/27] drm/dp_mst: Destroy MSTBs asynchronously
...tb->tx_slots[1] = NULL;
> > > - wake_tx = true;
> > > - }
> > > - mutex_unlock(&mstb->mgr->qlock);
> > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mstb->destroy_next);
> > >
> > > - if (wake_tx)
> > > - wake_up_all(&mstb->mgr->tx_waitq);
> > > -
> > > - drm_dp_mst_put_mstb_malloc(mstb);
> > > + /*
> > > + * This can get called under mgr->mutex, so we need to perform the
> > > + * actual destruction of the mstb in another worker
> > > + */
> > > + mutex_lock(&...
2019 Sep 03
0
[PATCH v2 03/27] drm/dp_mst: Destroy MSTBs asynchronously
...;
- }
- if (mstb->tx_slots[1]) {
- mstb->tx_slots[1]->state = DRM_DP_SIDEBAND_TX_TIMEOUT;
- mstb->tx_slots[1] = NULL;
- wake_tx = true;
- }
- mutex_unlock(&mstb->mgr->qlock);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mstb->destroy_next);
- if (wake_tx)
- wake_up_all(&mstb->mgr->tx_waitq);
-
- drm_dp_mst_put_mstb_malloc(mstb);
+ /*
+ * This can get called under mgr->mutex, so we need to perform the
+ * actual destruction of the mstb in another worker
+ */
+ mutex_lock(&mgr->delayed_destroy_lock);
+ list_add(&mstb->destroy_next, &mgr->destroy_branch_device...
2019 Oct 22
0
[PATCH v5 01/14] drm/dp_mst: Destroy MSTBs asynchronously
...;
- }
- if (mstb->tx_slots[1]) {
- mstb->tx_slots[1]->state = DRM_DP_SIDEBAND_TX_TIMEOUT;
- mstb->tx_slots[1] = NULL;
- wake_tx = true;
- }
- mutex_unlock(&mstb->mgr->qlock);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mstb->destroy_next);
- if (wake_tx)
- wake_up_all(&mstb->mgr->tx_waitq);
-
- drm_dp_mst_put_mstb_malloc(mstb);
+ /*
+ * This can get called under mgr->mutex, so we need to perform the
+ * actual destruction of the mstb in another worker
+ */
+ mutex_lock(&mgr->delayed_destroy_lock);
+ list_add(&mstb->destroy_next, &mgr->destroy_branch_device...
2019 Sep 25
0
[PATCH v2 03/27] drm/dp_mst: Destroy MSTBs asynchronously
...IDEBAND_TX_TIMEOUT;
> > - mstb->tx_slots[1] = NULL;
> > - wake_tx = true;
> > - }
> > - mutex_unlock(&mstb->mgr->qlock);
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mstb->destroy_next);
> >
> > - if (wake_tx)
> > - wake_up_all(&mstb->mgr->tx_waitq);
> > -
> > - drm_dp_mst_put_mstb_malloc(mstb);
> > + /*
> > + * This can get called under mgr->mutex, so we need to perform the
> > + * actual destruction of the mstb in another worker
> > + */
> > + mutex_lock(&mgr->delayed_destroy_lock);
>...
2019 Sep 03
0
[PATCH v2 13/27] drm/dp_mst: Refactor drm_dp_mst_handle_down_rep()
...lock);
- txmsg->state = DRM_DP_SIDEBAND_TX_RX;
- mstb->tx_slots[slot] = NULL;
- mutex_unlock(&mgr->qlock);
+ mutex_lock(&mgr->qlock);
+ txmsg->state = DRM_DP_SIDEBAND_TX_RX;
+ mstb->tx_slots[slot] = NULL;
+ mutex_unlock(&mgr->qlock);
- wake_up_all(&mgr->tx_waitq);
- }
- return ret;
+ wake_up_all(&mgr->tx_waitq);
+
+ return 0;
+
+no_msg:
+ drm_dp_mst_topology_put_mstb(mstb);
+clear_down_rep_recv:
+ memset(&mgr->down_rep_recv, 0, sizeof(struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_rx));
+
+ return 0;
}
static int drm_dp_mst_handle_up_req(struct drm_dp_mst_to...
2019 Sep 03
0
[PATCH v2 19/27] drm/dp_mst: Handle UP requests asynchronously
...up_req_list);
INIT_WORK(&mgr->work, drm_dp_mst_link_probe_work);
INIT_WORK(&mgr->tx_work, drm_dp_tx_work);
INIT_WORK(&mgr->delayed_destroy_work, drm_dp_delayed_destroy_work);
+ INIT_WORK(&mgr->up_req_work, drm_dp_mst_up_req_work);
init_waitqueue_head(&mgr->tx_waitq);
mgr->dev = dev;
mgr->aux = aux;
@@ -4382,6 +4447,7 @@ void drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_destroy(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
mutex_destroy(&mgr->payload_lock);
mutex_destroy(&mgr->qlock);
mutex_destroy(&mgr->lock);
+ mutex_destroy(&mgr->up_req_lock);...
2019 Oct 22
0
[PATCH v5 04/14] drm/dp_mst: Handle UP requests asynchronously
...up_req_list);
INIT_WORK(&mgr->work, drm_dp_mst_link_probe_work);
INIT_WORK(&mgr->tx_work, drm_dp_tx_work);
INIT_WORK(&mgr->delayed_destroy_work, drm_dp_delayed_destroy_work);
+ INIT_WORK(&mgr->up_req_work, drm_dp_mst_up_req_work);
init_waitqueue_head(&mgr->tx_waitq);
mgr->dev = dev;
mgr->aux = aux;
@@ -4348,6 +4413,7 @@ void drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_destroy(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
mutex_destroy(&mgr->payload_lock);
mutex_destroy(&mgr->qlock);
mutex_destroy(&mgr->lock);
+ mutex_destroy(&mgr->up_req_lock);...
2019 Sep 03
50
[PATCH v2 00/27] DP MST Refactors + debugging tools + suspend/resume reprobing
This is the large series for adding MST suspend/resume reprobing that
I've been working on for quite a while now. In addition, I:
- Refactored and cleaned up any code I ended up digging through in the
process of understanding how some parts of these helpers worked.
- Added some debugging tools along the way that I ended up needing to
figure out some issues in my own code
Note that
2018 Aug 28
2
[PATCH 0/4] drm/dp_mst: Add DP MST debugfs nodes for all drivers
This is the next version of my patch series for teaching DRM how to
automatically create debugfs nodes for drivers with MST topologies. This
was originally intended just for nouveau, but has since been expanded to
all DRM drivers.
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Stone <daniel at fooishbar.org>
Lyude Paul (4):
drm/debugfs: Add support for
2019 Oct 22
17
[PATCH v5 00/14] DP MST Refactors + debugging tools + suspend/resume reprobing
This is the final portion of the large series for adding MST
suspend/resume reprobing that I've been working on for quite a while
now. In addition, I:
* Refactored and cleaned up any code I ended up digging through in the
process of understanding how some parts of these helpers worked.
* Added some debugging tools along the way that I ended up needing to
figure out some issues in my own
2019 Jan 09
0
[PATCH v5 06/20] drm/dp_mst: Introduce new refcounting scheme for mstbs and ports
...;next);
drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port);
}
+ mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
/* drop any tx slots msg */
mutex_lock(&mstb->mgr->qlock);
@@ -908,14 +1073,83 @@ static void drm_dp_destroy_mst_branch_device(struct kref *kref)
if (wake_tx)
wake_up_all(&mstb->mgr->tx_waitq);
- kref_put(kref, drm_dp_free_mst_branch_device);
+ drm_dp_mst_put_mstb_malloc(mstb);
}
-static void drm_dp_mst_topology_put_mstb(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb)
+/**
+ * drm_dp_mst_topology_try_get_mstb() - Increment the topology refcount of a
+ * branch device unless its zero
+ * @mstb: &am...
2019 Jan 05
0
[PATCH v4 02/16] drm/dp_mst: Introduce new refcounting scheme for mstbs and ports
...;next);
drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port);
}
+ mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
/* drop any tx slots msg */
mutex_lock(&mstb->mgr->qlock);
@@ -908,14 +1073,83 @@ static void drm_dp_destroy_mst_branch_device(struct kref *kref)
if (wake_tx)
wake_up_all(&mstb->mgr->tx_waitq);
- kref_put(kref, drm_dp_free_mst_branch_device);
+ drm_dp_mst_put_mstb_malloc(mstb);
+}
+
+/**
+ * drm_dp_mst_topology_try_get_mstb() - Increment the topology refcount of a
+ * branch device unless its zero
+ * @mstb: &struct drm_dp_mst_branch to increment the topology refcount of
+ *
+ * A...
2018 Dec 14
0
[WIP PATCH 03/15] drm/dp_mst: Introduce new refcounting scheme for mstbs and ports
...t(port);
+ drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port);
}
+ mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
/* drop any tx slots msg */
mutex_lock(&mstb->mgr->qlock);
@@ -908,14 +982,82 @@ static void drm_dp_destroy_mst_branch_device(struct kref *kref)
if (wake_tx)
wake_up_all(&mstb->mgr->tx_waitq);
- kref_put(kref, drm_dp_free_mst_branch_device);
+ drm_dp_mst_put_mstb_malloc(mstb);
}
-static void drm_dp_put_mst_branch_device(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb)
+/**
+ * drm_dp_mst_topology_get_mstb() - Increment the topology refcount of a
+ * branch device unless its zero
+ * @mstb: &st...
2018 Dec 14
2
[WIP PATCH 03/15] drm/dp_mst: Introduce new refcounting scheme for mstbs and ports
...of the kref_init() hack not really feasible I think :-/
>
> /* drop any tx slots msg */
> mutex_lock(&mstb->mgr->qlock);
> @@ -908,14 +982,82 @@ static void drm_dp_destroy_mst_branch_device(struct kref *kref)
> if (wake_tx)
> wake_up_all(&mstb->mgr->tx_waitq);
>
> - kref_put(kref, drm_dp_free_mst_branch_device);
> + drm_dp_mst_put_mstb_malloc(mstb);
> }
>
> -static void drm_dp_put_mst_branch_device(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb)
> +/**
> + * drm_dp_mst_topology_get_mstb() - Increment the topology refcount of a
> + * bra...
2018 Dec 19
1
[WIP PATCH 03/15] drm/dp_mst: Introduce new refcounting scheme for mstbs and ports
...gt; > > /* drop any tx slots msg */
> > > mutex_lock(&mstb->mgr->qlock);
> > > @@ -908,14 +982,82 @@ static void drm_dp_destroy_mst_branch_device(struct
> > > kref *kref)
> > > if (wake_tx)
> > > wake_up_all(&mstb->mgr->tx_waitq);
> > >
> > > - kref_put(kref, drm_dp_free_mst_branch_device);
> > > + drm_dp_mst_put_mstb_malloc(mstb);
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static void drm_dp_put_mst_branch_device(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb)
> > > +/**
> > > + * dr...
2018 Dec 18
0
[WIP PATCH 03/15] drm/dp_mst: Introduce new refcounting scheme for mstbs and ports
...ible I think :-/
> >
> > /* drop any tx slots msg */
> > mutex_lock(&mstb->mgr->qlock);
> > @@ -908,14 +982,82 @@ static void drm_dp_destroy_mst_branch_device(struct
> > kref *kref)
> > if (wake_tx)
> > wake_up_all(&mstb->mgr->tx_waitq);
> >
> > - kref_put(kref, drm_dp_free_mst_branch_device);
> > + drm_dp_mst_put_mstb_malloc(mstb);
> > }
> >
> > -static void drm_dp_put_mst_branch_device(struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb)
> > +/**
> > + * drm_dp_mst_topology_get_mstb() - Increment...
2019 Jan 05
19
[PATCH v4 00/16] MST refcounting/atomic helpers cleanup
This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of
the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to
make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot
more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device
refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current
upstream implementation requires a
2018 Dec 14
22
[WIP PATCH 00/15] MST refcounting/atomic helpers cleanup
This is a WIP version of the series I've been working on for a while now
to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST
helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns
out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port
and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense,
since the current upstream
2019 Jan 09
27
[PATCH v5 00/20] MST refcounting/atomic helpers cleanup
This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of
the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to
make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot
more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device
refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current
upstream implementation requires a