Displaying 16 results from an estimated 16 matches for "twolf".
Did you mean:
wolf
2010 Nov 13
3
[LLVMdev] tot clang/llvm and tot gcc performance comparision
...253.perlbmk 2214 2444 10.37%
254.gap 1987 1978 -0.47%
255.vortex 2497 2422 -3.00%
256.bzip2 1585 1740 9.80%
300.twolf 2294 2281 -0.58%
As you can see, LLVM beats gcc in vpr, crafty and vortex by about 3%, but
falls behind gcc in gzip, gcc, mcf, eon, perfbmk, and bzip2 by a large
margin.
32bit:
llvm gcc
gcc vs llvm...
2010 Nov 14
0
[LLVMdev] tot clang/llvm and tot gcc performance comparision
...2214 2444 10.37%
> 254.gap 1987 1978 -0.47%
> 255.vortex 2497 2422 -3.00%
> 256.bzip2 1585 1740 9.80%
> 300.twolf 2294 2281 -0.58%
>
> As you can see, LLVM beats gcc in vpr, crafty and vortex by about 3%, but falls behind gcc in gzip, gcc, mcf, eon, perfbmk, and bzip2 by a large margin.
>
>
> 32bit:
> llvm...
2008 Mar 01
1
[LLVMdev] Instruction Scheduling
....00
CINT2000/197.parser/197.parser 1.01
CINT2000/252.eon/252.eon n/a // never runs
CINT2000/253.perlbmk/253.perlbmk 1.05
CINT2000/254.gap/254.gap 0.97
CINT2000/255.vortex/255.vortex 1.00
CINT2000/256.bzip2/256.bzip2 0.98
CINT2000/300.twolf/300.twolf 0.92
In three cases, I got a ratio above 1 [Must mean: scheduling had a
negative impact on performance.] I just run it once, but I was wondering
if this could make sense, or if I am setting the tests wrongly. I am
running the nightly test Makefile, in a x86 linux 32 bits ma...
2005 May 13
0
[LLVMdev] Sparc Regressions
Dear All,
The list of SparcV9 Regressions:
SPEC/CINT2000/300.twolf/300.twolf
-- John T.
--
John T. Criswell
Research Programmer
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
"It's today!" said Piglet. "My favorite day," said Pooh.
2010 Feb 15
0
[LLVMdev] Measurements of the new inlinehint attribute
...253.perlbmk 0.13% -0.41% 33.45% 1.67%
SPEC/CINT2000/254.gap/254.gap 0.24% -0.98% 13.90% 1.50%
SPEC/CINT2000/255.vortex/255.vortex 0.00% 0.00% 94.96% -6.59%
SPEC/CINT2000/256.bzip2/256.bzip2 0.00% -0.09% 37.42% 1.84%
SPEC/CINT2000/300.twolf/300.twolf 0.00% 0.00% 9.59% 0.96%
SPEC/CINT2006/400.perlbench/400.perlbench 0.33% 0.40% 35.88% -2.45%
SPEC/CINT2006/401.bzip2/401.bzip2 0.00% -0.94% 69.38% -0.94%
SPEC/CINT2006/403.gcc/403.gcc 0.76% 0.00% 48.35% 1.20%
SPEC/CINT2006/4...
2004 Jan 05
1
slow and max connection errors
...oung,gblack,gbonner,gfriedman,gmarciniak,imoore,jburns,jmayer,jm
ccormick,jmercer,jpallotto,jrodriguez,jsabel,jvirgil,jvoss,kjohnson,lbro
wn,lfields,lperkins,mfleming,mhaynes,mheimple,mkarge,mwager,nwallace,rbo
wen,robbowen,rrestivo,rstearns,rwinterboer,skirtland,swright,syoung,tbur
gess,tswapp,twolf,wgriffith
create mode = 750
directory mode = 2750
I think that's it. Thanks
On Jan 5, 2004, at 9:36 AM, Jason Balicki wrote:
>> I am new to Samba and think I have it set up correctly. I have two
>> issues that I need to resolve but don't quite know where to...
2002 Dec 12
0
[LLVMdev] New RAW bytecode files for a couple spec benchmarks
It came up in class today that people might have use for unoptimized
versions of the SPEC benchmark files. As such, I uploaded these new
bytecode files, which are the largest of the spec benchmarks:
http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/LLVMPrograms/SPEC/
254.gap.RAW.bc
255.vortex.RAW.bc
300.twolf.RAW.bc
In these bytecode files, LICM and GCSE eliminate tens of thousands of
instructions. They should be a good testcase for PRE or whatever.
-Chris
--
http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/
http://www.nondot.org/~sabre/Projects/
2011 Apr 30
2
[LLVMdev] Greedy register allocation
...rce/Applications/d/Output/make_dparser
-2.5% External/SPEC/CINT95/124.m88ksim/Output/124.m88ksim
-2.5% External/SPEC/CINT2006/458.sjeng/Output/458.sjeng
-2.4% MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/bh/Output/bh
-2.4% MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/espresso/Output/espresso
-2.4% External/SPEC/CINT2000/300.twolf/Output/300.twolf
-2.4% MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/unix-smail/Output/unix-smail
-2.3% MultiSource/Applications/kimwitu++/Output/kc
-2.3% MultiSource/Applications/hbd/Output/hbd
-2.3% MultiSource/Applications/spiff/Output/spiff
-2.3% MultiSource/Applications/hexxagon/Output/hexxagon
-2.3% Exte...
2012 Jun 05
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] add x32 psABI support
...2% -6.64%
254.gap 3527 3201 3286 10.18% 7.33% 662043 654386 723806 1.17% -8.53%
255.vortex 3921 3183 3828 23.19% 2.43% 644793 710252 669460 -9.22% -3.68%
256.bzip2 2263 2054 2241 10.18% 0.98% 54008 53922 58123 0.16% -7.08%
300.twolf 3706 3578 3388 3.58% 9.39% 223957 219748 234142 1.92% -4.35%
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
geomean 3183 2794 2788 13.91% 14.15% 219228 225405 236945 -2.74% -7.48%...
2009 Dec 23
0
[LLVMdev] Problem while compling SPEC2000 with llvm-gcc
On 2009-12-23 08:22, Li Shengmei wrote:
>
> Hi, all
>
> I use llvm-gcc –O4 to compile SPEC 2000, some benchmarks
> can’t be built successfully, such as 164.gzip, 175.vpr etc.
>
> The error messages are as follows.
>
>
>
> ……
>
> zh.o unlzw.o unpack.o unzip.o util.o zip.o -o gzip
>
> bits.o: file not recognized: File format not recognized
2003 Jun 26
1
[LLVMdev] Core LLVM status update
I recently realized that I haven't sent out a status update for the LLVM
core components quite a while, so here is a new one:
We've been really busy working on LLVM adding all kinds of new features,
fixing lots of bugs, and are rapidly converging on our 1.0 release for
this August. Here are some of the new features added recently:
1. Support for static constructors/destructors in
2011 Jan 19
0
[LLVMdev] Building 176.gcc
On 01/18/2011 06:38 PM, Bin Zeng wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have been stumped on a compilation problem when I tried to build
> 176.gcc of SPEC CPU2000 with clang v 2.8 (trunk 427) on Linux and intel.
> First, I tried to compile with 'clang -std=c89 *.c -o gcc.clang' since
> the default C standard of Clang is c99 while that of gcc is c89. It
> reported this error:
>
2009 Dec 23
2
[LLVMdev] Problem while compling SPEC2000 with llvm-gcc
Hi, all
I use llvm-gcc -O4 to compile SPEC 2000, some benchmarks can't be
built successfully, such as 164.gzip, 175.vpr etc.
The error messages are as follows.
..
zh.o unlzw.o unpack.o unzip.o util.o zip.o -o gzip
bits.o: file not recognized: File format not recognized
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
specmake: *** [gzip] Error 1
specmake options 2> options.err |
2012 Jun 07
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] add x32 psABI support
...2% -6.64%
254.gap 3527 3201 3286 10.18% 7.33% 662043 654386 723806 1.17% -8.53%
255.vortex 3921 3183 3828 23.19% 2.43% 644793 710252 669460 -9.22% -3.68%
256.bzip2 2263 2054 2241 10.18% 0.98% 54008 53922 58123 0.16% -7.08%
300.twolf 3706 3578 3388 3.58% 9.39% 223957 219748 234142 1.92% -4.35%
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
geomean 3183 2794 2788 13.91% 14.15% 219228 225405 236945 -2.74% -7.48%...
2011 Jan 19
2
[LLVMdev] Building 176.gcc
Hi folks,
I have been stumped on a compilation problem when I tried to build
176.gcc of SPEC CPU2000 with clang v 2.8 (trunk 427) on Linux and intel.
First, I tried to compile with 'clang -std=c89 *.c -o gcc.clang' since
the default C standard of Clang is c99 while that of gcc is c89. It
reported this error:
./c-gperf.h:14:1: error: unknown type name 'inline'
inline
^
2005 May 14
1
permissions not transferred using robocopy, xxcopy, net share migrate shares
Hello:
I've been working for a few days on getting a FreeBSD 5.3 server up and
running as a samba data backup server.
My goal is to schedule periodic backups of our file server. After reading
recommendations (e.g. by Mr. Terpstra) I've focused my attempts aroung
robocopy, xxcopy, net rpc share migrate shares.
However, I'm running into stumbling blocks that seem to involve a problem