Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "tvrtek".
Did you mean:
trek
2023 Jan 06
1
Directly setting unicodePwd - better type of hash?
...probably) not, but I consider samba better product and with it's open nature more versatile.
Anyway, thank you for clarification.
________________________________
Od: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> za u?ivatele Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>
Odesl?no: ?tvrtek 5. ledna 2023 14:12
Komu: samba at lists.samba.org <samba at lists.samba.org>
Kopie: Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org>
P?edm?t: Re: [Samba] Directly setting unicodePwd - better type of hash?
On 05/01/2023 12:18, Edward Graham via samba wrote:
> It works for us without problems....
2023 Jan 05
1
Directly setting unicodePwd - better type of hash?
...We would like to improve security though, so I'm looking for information whether it's possible to use different hash in samba.
________________________________
Od: samba <samba-bounces at lists.samba.org> za u?ivatele Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>
Odesl?no: ?tvrtek 5. ledna 2023 12:15
Komu: samba at lists.samba.org <samba at lists.samba.org>
Kopie: Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org>
P?edm?t: Re: [Samba] Directly setting unicodePwd - better type of hash?
On 05/01/2023 10:13, Edward Graham via samba wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we sync our password...
2023 Jan 05
1
Directly setting unicodePwd - better type of hash?
On 05/01/2023 12:18, Edward Graham via samba wrote:
> It works for us without problems. We would like to improve security though, so I'm looking for information whether it's possible to use different hash in samba.
No, would you ask this question about Microsoft AD ?
Rowland
2023 Jan 05
1
Directly setting unicodePwd - better type of hash?
On 05/01/2023 10:13, Edward Graham via samba wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we sync our password from other system by directly setting unicodePwd in samba database file. We would like to drop the insecure hash stored in other system and replace it with something newer and more robust.
>
> Documentation on page
2010 Jul 29
3
problem with mail_full_filesystem_access = yes
Hello,
I have configured Dovecot 1.2.12 with Postfix 2.6.5 and everything is working fine. But tomorrow I wanted to run IMAP
ALCs and from log I found that this plugin is conflicting with parameter mail_full_filesystem_access = yes in my config.
But when I set mail_full_filesystem_access = no it stops authorization for postfix with this message:
<pasek at valbek.cz>: Command died with