Displaying 20 results from an estimated 107 matches for "tvq".
Did you mean:
tv
2018 Aug 01
5
[PATCH net-next v7 0/4] net: vhost: improve performance when enable busyloop
From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com>
This patches improve the guest receive performance.
On the handle_tx side, we poll the sock receive queue
at the same time. handle_rx do that in the same way.
For more performance report, see patch 4.
v6->v7:
fix issue and rebase codes:
1. on tx, busypoll will vhost_net_disable/enable_vq rx vq.
[This is suggested by Toshiaki Makita
2018 Jul 21
0
[PATCH net-next v6 3/4] net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
...*sock = sk->sk_socket;
+
+ if (sock->ops->peek_len)
+ return sock->ops->peek_len(sock);
+
+ return skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
+}
+
+static void vhost_net_busy_poll_vq_check(struct vhost_net *net,
+ struct vhost_virtqueue *rvq,
+ struct vhost_virtqueue *tvq,
+ bool rx)
+{
+ struct socket *sock = rvq->private_data;
+
+ if (rx) {
+ if (!vhost_vq_avail_empty(&net->dev, tvq)) {
+ vhost_poll_queue(&tvq->poll);
+ } else if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&net->dev, tvq))) {
+ vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, tvq);
+...
2018 Aug 01
2
[PATCH net-next v7 3/4] net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
...y(&net->dev, vq))) {
> + vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, vq);
> + vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void vhost_net_busy_poll_check(struct vhost_net *net,
> + struct vhost_virtqueue *rvq,
> + struct vhost_virtqueue *tvq,
> + bool rx)
> +{
> + struct socket *sock = rvq->private_data;
> +
> + if (rx)
> + vhost_net_busy_poll_try_queue(net, tvq);
> + else if (sock && sk_has_rx_data(sock->sk))
> + vhost_net_busy_poll_try_queue(net, rvq);
> + else {
> + /* On tx he...
2018 Aug 01
2
[PATCH net-next v7 3/4] net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
...y(&net->dev, vq))) {
> + vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, vq);
> + vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void vhost_net_busy_poll_check(struct vhost_net *net,
> + struct vhost_virtqueue *rvq,
> + struct vhost_virtqueue *tvq,
> + bool rx)
> +{
> + struct socket *sock = rvq->private_data;
> +
> + if (rx)
> + vhost_net_busy_poll_try_queue(net, tvq);
> + else if (sock && sk_has_rx_data(sock->sk))
> + vhost_net_busy_poll_try_queue(net, rvq);
> + else {
> + /* On tx he...
2018 Jul 21
7
[PATCH net-next v6 0/4] net: vhost: improve performance when enable busyloop
From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com>
This patches improve the guest receive performance.
On the handle_tx side, we poll the sock receive queue
at the same time. handle_rx do that in the same way.
For more performance report, see patch 4.
v5->v6:
rebase the codes.
Tonghao Zhang (4):
net: vhost: lock the vqs one by one
net: vhost: replace magic number of lock annotation
2018 Aug 01
0
[PATCH net-next v7 3/4] net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
...+ } else if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&net->dev, vq))) {
+ vhost_disable_notify(&net->dev, vq);
+ vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
+ }
+}
+
+static void vhost_net_busy_poll_check(struct vhost_net *net,
+ struct vhost_virtqueue *rvq,
+ struct vhost_virtqueue *tvq,
+ bool rx)
+{
+ struct socket *sock = rvq->private_data;
+
+ if (rx)
+ vhost_net_busy_poll_try_queue(net, tvq);
+ else if (sock && sk_has_rx_data(sock->sk))
+ vhost_net_busy_poll_try_queue(net, rvq);
+ else {
+ /* On tx here, sock has no rx data, so we
+ * will wait for...
2018 Jul 04
2
[PATCH net-next v5 3/4] net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
On 2018/07/04 13:31, xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote:
...
> +static void vhost_net_busy_poll(struct vhost_net *net,
> + struct vhost_virtqueue *rvq,
> + struct vhost_virtqueue *tvq,
> + bool rx)
> +{
> + unsigned long uninitialized_var(endtime);
> + unsigned long busyloop_timeout;
> + struct socket *sock;
> + struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = rx ? tvq : rvq;
> +
> + mutex_lock_nested(&vq->mutex, rx ? VHOST_NET_VQ_TX: VHOST_NET_VQ_RX);
> +
>...
2018 Jul 04
2
[PATCH net-next v5 3/4] net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
On 2018/07/04 13:31, xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote:
...
> +static void vhost_net_busy_poll(struct vhost_net *net,
> + struct vhost_virtqueue *rvq,
> + struct vhost_virtqueue *tvq,
> + bool rx)
> +{
> + unsigned long uninitialized_var(endtime);
> + unsigned long busyloop_timeout;
> + struct socket *sock;
> + struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = rx ? tvq : rvq;
> +
> + mutex_lock_nested(&vq->mutex, rx ? VHOST_NET_VQ_TX: VHOST_NET_VQ_RX);
> +
>...
2018 Sep 09
0
[PATCH net-next v8 3/7] net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
...t; > + vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void vhost_net_busy_poll(struct vhost_net *net,
> > + struct vhost_virtqueue *rvq,
> > + struct vhost_virtqueue *tvq,
> > + bool *busyloop_intr,
> > + bool poll_rx)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long busyloop_timeout;
> > + unsigned long endtime;
> > + struct socket *sock;
> > + struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = p...
2018 Aug 01
0
[PATCH net-next v7 3/4] net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
...vhost_poll_queue(&vq->poll);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void vhost_net_busy_poll_check(struct vhost_net *net,
> > + struct vhost_virtqueue *rvq,
> > + struct vhost_virtqueue *tvq,
> > + bool rx)
> > +{
> > + struct socket *sock = rvq->private_data;
> > +
> > + if (rx)
> > + vhost_net_busy_poll_try_queue(net, tvq);
> > + else if (sock && sk_has_rx_data(sock->sk))...
2018 Sep 09
7
[PATCH net-next v9 0/6] net: vhost: improve performance when enable busyloop
From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com>
This patches improve the guest receive performance.
On the handle_tx side, we poll the sock receive queue
at the same time. handle_rx do that in the same way.
For more performance report, see patch 4, 5, 6
Tonghao Zhang (6):
net: vhost: lock the vqs one by one
net: vhost: replace magic number of lock annotation
net: vhost: factor out
2018 Sep 09
7
[PATCH net-next v9 0/6] net: vhost: improve performance when enable busyloop
From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com>
This patches improve the guest receive performance.
On the handle_tx side, we poll the sock receive queue
at the same time. handle_rx do that in the same way.
For more performance report, see patch 4, 5, 6
Tonghao Zhang (6):
net: vhost: lock the vqs one by one
net: vhost: replace magic number of lock annotation
net: vhost: factor out
2018 Jul 24
3
[PATCH net-next v6 3/4] net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
...gt;>>> ---
>>>> ...
>>>>> +static void vhost_net_busy_poll_vq_check(struct vhost_net *net,
>>>>> + struct vhost_virtqueue *rvq,
>>>>> + struct vhost_virtqueue *tvq,
>>>>> + bool rx)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + struct socket *sock = rvq->private_data;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (rx) {
>>>>> + if (!vhost_vq_avail_empty(&net->...
2018 Jul 24
3
[PATCH net-next v6 3/4] net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
...gt;>>> ---
>>>> ...
>>>>> +static void vhost_net_busy_poll_vq_check(struct vhost_net *net,
>>>>> + struct vhost_virtqueue *rvq,
>>>>> + struct vhost_virtqueue *tvq,
>>>>> + bool rx)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + struct socket *sock = rvq->private_data;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (rx) {
>>>>> + if (!vhost_vq_avail_empty(&net->...
2018 Jul 23
3
[PATCH net-next v6 3/4] net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
...gt; qemu can set differently the busyloop_timeout for rx queue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com>
> ---
...
> +static void vhost_net_busy_poll_vq_check(struct vhost_net *net,
> + struct vhost_virtqueue *rvq,
> + struct vhost_virtqueue *tvq,
> + bool rx)
> +{
> + struct socket *sock = rvq->private_data;
> +
> + if (rx) {
> + if (!vhost_vq_avail_empty(&net->dev, tvq)) {
> + vhost_poll_queue(&tvq->poll);
> + } else if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&net->dev, tvq))) {
> + vhos...
2018 Jul 23
3
[PATCH net-next v6 3/4] net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
...gt; qemu can set differently the busyloop_timeout for rx queue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com>
> ---
...
> +static void vhost_net_busy_poll_vq_check(struct vhost_net *net,
> + struct vhost_virtqueue *rvq,
> + struct vhost_virtqueue *tvq,
> + bool rx)
> +{
> + struct socket *sock = rvq->private_data;
> +
> + if (rx) {
> + if (!vhost_vq_avail_empty(&net->dev, tvq)) {
> + vhost_poll_queue(&tvq->poll);
> + } else if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&net->dev, tvq))) {
> + vhos...
2018 Sep 25
6
[REBASE PATCH net-next v9 0/4] net: vhost: improve performance when enable busyloop
From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com>
This patches improve the guest receive performance.
On the handle_tx side, we poll the sock receive queue
at the same time. handle_rx do that in the same way.
For more performance report, see patch 4
Tonghao Zhang (4):
net: vhost: lock the vqs one by one
net: vhost: replace magic number of lock annotation
net: vhost: factor out busy
2018 Jul 04
1
[PATCH net-next v5 3/4] net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
...ita wrote:
> > On 2018/07/04 13:31, xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote:
> > ...
> >> +static void vhost_net_busy_poll(struct vhost_net *net,
> >> + struct vhost_virtqueue *rvq,
> >> + struct vhost_virtqueue *tvq,
> >> + bool rx)
> >> +{
> >> + unsigned long uninitialized_var(endtime);
> >> + unsigned long busyloop_timeout;
> >> + struct socket *sock;
> >> + struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = rx ? tvq : rvq;
> >>...
2018 Jul 03
0
[PATCH v2 net-next 1/4] vhost_net: Rename local variables in vhost_net_rx_peek_head_len
...ET_VQ_RX];
- struct vhost_net_virtqueue *nvq = &net->vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_TX];
- struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &nvq->vq;
+ struct vhost_net_virtqueue *rnvq = &net->vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_RX];
+ struct vhost_net_virtqueue *tnvq = &net->vqs[VHOST_NET_VQ_TX];
+ struct vhost_virtqueue *tvq = &tnvq->vq;
unsigned long uninitialized_var(endtime);
- int len = peek_head_len(rvq, sk);
+ int len = peek_head_len(rnvq, sk);
- if (!len && vq->busyloop_timeout) {
+ if (!len && tvq->busyloop_timeout) {
/* Flush batched heads first */
- vhost_rx_signal_used(rv...
2018 Jul 03
11
[PATCH v2 net-next 0/4] vhost_net: Avoid vq kicks during busyloop
Under heavy load vhost tx busypoll tend not to suppress vq kicks, which
causes poor guest tx performance. The detailed scenario is described in
commitlog of patch 2.
Rx seems not to have that serious problem, but for consistency I made a
similar change on rx to avoid rx wakeups (patch 3).
Additionary patch 4 is to avoid rx kicks under heavy load during
busypoll.
Tx performance is greatly improved