search for: tvm

...ation targets in the upstream. The reason why I would like to again raise the matter is that we, the TON Labs team, would like to upstream our backend solution. The backend generates code for TON virtual machine designed to run smart contracts in TON blockchain (see the original specifications for TVM and TON respectively at <https://test.ton.org/tvm.pdf> https://test.ton.org/tvm.pdf and at <https://test.ton.org/tblkch.pdf> https://test.ton.org/tblkch.pdf). The target has the following key particularities: - stack-based virtual machine - 257-bit wide integers, signed magnitud...

...-leading blazing fast inference speed on mobile and it is tiny in size. In the internal experiments we ran, MNN outperforms other inference engines under almost all settings by about 20% - 40%. And we are trying to make it even faster and support more computational backends by exploring MLIR, XLA, TVM and the like. We’d love to hear from anyone interested in the following position: Company: Alibaba. Location: Hangzhou or Beijing in China. Language: Chinese is preferred. Job Description: You will be working on MNN with a team of enthusiastic, energetic, talented and hard-working engineers...

...SERID disable = no } I can't access is from either the browser on my PC or from KDE's Konqueror Have I missed some vital step ? It all worked last week when I first/second/third installed everything but I've been busy installing M$ Windoze 2000 for a few days and my brain is addled. TVM Mike

Hello, I have problems running Xen (from Debian 7, i386 userspace) on Asus P3-AE5 system (M2V-TVM board) with Athlon 64 3000+ CPU (AM2, 1.8GHz). In short, Xen is not accessible from amd64 Linux kernels but works fine with 686 kernels. Long version: xen-system-i386 (4.1.4-3+deb7u1) works fine with linux-image-3.2.0-4-686-pae xen-system-amd64 (4.1.4-3+deb7u1) works fine with linux-image-3.2.0-...

...ia could be removed. > > 2. Use an iconic target. PDP10 was suggested as a candidate. This opinion found support from Tim Northover, Joerg Sonenberger, Mehdi AMINI, Philip Reames. It's not clear though does this opinion oppose upstreaming non-8-bits byte without tests or just a dummy and TVM targets options. > > So if there is no strong opposition to the solution 1 from the people supporting an iconic target option, we could probably move to the patches. I'm in camp (2). Any changes that are not tested are an invitation to upstream developers to "simplify" the cod...

On Wed, 2019-10-30 at 15:30 -0700, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev wrote: > > On Oct 30, 2019, at 3:07 AM, Jeroen Dobbelaere via llvm-dev < > > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > > From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> On Behalf Of JF > > > Bastien via > > > > [..] > > > Is it relevant to any modern compiler

On 24/10/2019 14:21, JF Bastien via llvm-dev wrote: > I’d like to understand what programming model you see programmers using. > You don’t need 257 bits per byte if you only offer 257 bit integers. > Rather, bytes aren’t really a thing at that point. LLVM kinda handles iN > already, and your backend would legalize everything to exactly this type > and nothing else, right? Would

I'd like to download a complete mail archive so that I can browse for problems concerning Mulberry. Is this possible, or can I only get them in monthly gulps? Cheers, Terry. --

Dear Sir, I faced problem during the installation of wordcloud package in R -2.15 . I have mentioned the error below. After selecting the cran mirror it shows the error. I will be thankful for your response to this solution. Error Selection: 34 Warning: unable to access index for repository http://ftp.iitm.ac.in/cran/src/contrib Error in apply(available[p1, dependencies, drop = FALSE], 1L,

...bly backend. To avoid that workaround, I would prefer to add a bit named something like "implicitDefsAreVirtual" that I could just set for all WebAssembly instructions. WebAssembly is the only upstream stack machine target, but other downstream stack machine targets such as TON Labs' TVM have adopted our approach of using virtual registers and would also benefit from having such a bit. On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 9:04 AM Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > If you know a specific instruction pushes a value on the stack and want to > repr...

...no gnome desktops for any of the users on this host. When root logs in all that is shown is a deep blue background and a wirefram outline of the Firefox web browser, a wire frame outline of an xterm window and an analogue clock. Left clicking on teh background displays a popup menu labeled "Tvm". The mouse and keyboard work and when one clicks on the wireframs then immediately fill with the application background, the CentOS welcome back for FireFox and a black on white scheme for xterm. All the windows have teal menu bars. Further, it seems that I cannot switch between windows....

Hi, I''m a newby and I fight with the Rails convention - i think so. I''ve done little tools and scripts in Ruby before. I''ve successfully uploaded a textfile. And now i want to extract some filecontent to pass it into a database. My Problem: I can not start a given method of a given Model (=> Metadata.extract_content(fileuri)). The error message ''undefined

...> 2. Use an iconic target. PDP10 was suggested as a candidate. This >> opinion found support from Tim Northover, Joerg Sonenberger, Mehdi AMINI, >> Philip Reames. It's not clear though does this opinion oppose upstreaming >> non-8-bits byte without tests or just a dummy and TVM targets options. >> > >> > So if there is no strong opposition to the solution 1 from the people >> supporting an iconic target option, we could probably move to the patches. >> >> I'm in camp (2). Any changes that are not tested are an invitation to >>...

...o avoid that workaround, I would prefer to add a bit named something like > "implicitDefsAreVirtual" that I could just set for all WebAssembly > instructions. WebAssembly is the only upstream stack machine target, but > other downstream stack machine targets such as TON Labs' TVM have adopted > our approach of using virtual registers and would also benefit from having > such a bit. > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 9:04 AM Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at apple.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Thomas, >> >> If you know a specific instruction pushes a...

...rget. PDP10 was suggested as a candidate. This >>>> opinion found support from Tim Northover, Joerg Sonenberger, Mehdi AMINI, >>>> Philip Reames. It's not clear though does this opinion oppose upstreaming >>>> non-8-bits byte without tests or just a dummy and TVM targets options. >>>> > >>>> > So if there is no strong opposition to the solution 1 from the people >>>> supporting an iconic target option, we could probably move to the patches. >>>> >>>> I'm in camp (2). Any changes that are...

Hi Quentin, Thanks, that explanation makes sense. I can see that in a normal register machine, implicitly defs must be physical registers. In a stack machine like WebAssembly, though, implicit defs are known to be pushed onto the value stack just like any other defs. Slots on the value stack are represented by virtual registers until stackification, so for WebAssembly we do need the implicit defs

...L2O3;B<XHT43D*1:5J&IBBPJ&JDHBK^JR^ M3 at M0%1N/3*)1$=DS2P=*W:D7]8VB52(Z*)L3Q$23:W1KZE0U9E KX6)]9'&4 MMS76.BHG^JAM4 %ZU-J< 3ZZ9OPH(&41 at _1V%E)6>H3&:<!<I+2AD=*'ZE"\ MK -UH:3 at ZRA5I).22;_*7>6DF]56)@%0.E(J"BG=*Y%K0RP,:K0=O.'".*3= MCS+$TVM!375.<-4L&B-*WM+$D$M3#"_UI4WB)P73$#A,3Y$Q1:9'09F> 9>2 M2$>8\!%3RA5DF)1,=DVU2S9M ]N4<4H45_5-$</$:*\1YYQ*AG1:B=8IN6BG MT&%23-?+P$R;*3V%J'<3GSJURGI6[X-:#9#C-%%TU)]I3[LFWHR$B3417M:3 M.EG=YS at U-0_VHWK80"A2*^J$-:LCMHAR2%2883<LA'V((?4*_2R2&F(MJX5%...

...t 8fXDTKyCCt%nJ z>@(2j9#CSZQR;a9z0u`=Lgx(mHH`po at A#dyh)$Q2`^{9e4LKEAtQs|#R>1Dl``qRo zTtbe|*Kfy!3#&MA=-^==HQ%QXnbp+&+BS&Zu8jSP?Dt=0O=lA7t%9&>XmL!*SL9Fr zlHE0_`tYc=-*hh*K7pU4!1$9CMmC5yx|81%Z4Dk@#wt`f9ad!Dcz#zvHOnjeRpt*h z<_uYv>WyJo^+|EFH at J6qHaX~EUYYwEpV;n*;il^ULJWf=TVm)6{rzGPF5MDC$!>$N z(fLxbAi?<@u`PRUwcIkk-AR^S-i!wa(fJTxc-UU}rH0^p!>G~b8%xda=qfqBKnOR6 z{gcViK8KKudD1!ksUP&Ygl-ytR`B%s7k at H-7xjw=K7T{O$^St8&F5cHU{B|?GYDC# zZ-d7(vwSi8AE>d&$r062i{-%B4D^|B$@Bnf0Szi0y32hI^h8V2JJBFB2QVFK3W_Sz zknEs~khpipLA)eJ#d>RK{{zP-+nUmMg&(9W$d^b-^*KCW7...

Thanks for the reply Guss, So in my case the Amazon VPS server is behind a FULL CONE NAT(static NAT), so is that enough to hole punch other nodes. what all ports will should be opened up on the NAT device? Most of the other nodes are behind cg-nat, so I wont have any control over its nat. Thank you, Regards, Bobby Thomas. On Oct 19, 2015 1:45 AM, "Guus Sliepen" <guus at

Hi all, I am new to Tinc VPN and really would like to make full benefit of this implementation if possible. I would like to know whether I will be able to use Tinc to its full potential. My current setup is as follows, IPfire router/firewall(openvpn client) --->ISP(Internet)--->Amazon VPS(openvpn server). The ipfire router is behind a CARRIER-GRADE NAT, I am able to reach the network