Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "tvcell".
2004 Sep 10
2
building package troubles
when i try to build rpm package of 1.0.1
i get some error messages (in attach)...
version 1.0 with the same spec builds fine...
any ideas?
--
andrei at tvcell d0t ru
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: flac_install_error.txt.bz2
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1184 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/attachments/20011123/143a977b/flac_install_error.txt.obj
2004 Sep 10
2
flac-1.0.3_beta released
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002 11:51:33 +0400
Andrey Astafiev <andrei@tvcell.ru> wrote:
> flac-1.0.3_beta compilation breaks for me with message:
I had the same experience, too. I think that a cause is in configure and
configure.in files. Therefore, let's rebuild these files.
I took the following, and solved the problem.
$ cd flac-1.0.3_beta
$ automake
$ autoco...
2004 Sep 10
1
building package troubles
...The problem is likely with your spec file;
> send a copy to the list and I'll look at it.
thanks, i've found the error by myself.
there was export LDFLAGS="-L$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib"
missing. anyway, it's strange, because 1.0 with the same
spec builds fine.
--
andrei at tvcell d0t ru
2004 Sep 10
0
flac-1.0.3_beta released
...-O2 -O3 -DNDEBUG
-fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -finline-functions -Wall -W
-Winline -DFLaC__INLINE=__inline__ -c -o bitbuffer.lo `test -f
bitbuffer.c || echo './'`bitbuffer.c
../../depcomp: ../../depcomp: No such file or directory
make[3]: *** [bitbuffer.lo] Error 127
--
andrei at tvcell d0t ru
2004 Sep 10
3
possible format change
After doing a lot of automated seek testing on files, it looks like
the length of the sync code (currently 9 bits) is not long enough to
enable a really robust AND efficient seek algorithm. Lengthening the
sync code will require a format change (i.e. FLAC <0.8 streams won't
play back on FLAC >0.9 decoders), so I'm sending this message out to
see if there is any "NO DON'T DO
2004 Sep 10
11
flac-1.0.3_beta released
I have just released a source distribution which is the
candidate for the 1.0.3 release. At this time I would
ask anyone who is willing to help test it to do the
following:
1. download the tarball and unzip it:
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/flac/flac-1.0.3_beta-src.tar.gz?download
2. do
./configure && make && make check
This will build all code and run all the tests.
2004 Sep 10
1
bug in winamp plugin 0.8
winamp plugin 0.8 produces kinda "metallic" sound
though files were encoded with flac 0.8 with -V.
files decoded back in .wav sound fine.
p.s. josh, i'd like to make russian version of your site.
could you tell me the better way how could i keep track of
changes in your site?
reading you materials i found a mistake.
it's in features page.
"FLAC streams can be played back
2004 Sep 10
0
possible format change
JC> After doing a lot of automated seek testing on files, it looks like
JC> the length of the sync code (currently 9 bits) is not long enough to
JC> enable a really robust AND efficient seek algorithm. Lengthening the
JC> sync code will require a format change (i.e. FLAC <0.8 streams won't
JC> play back on FLAC >>0.9 decoders), so I'm sending this message out to
2004 Sep 10
2
error building 1.0
> > The build bombs out on the xmms plugin on redhat 7.1 box:
> > Any suggestions?
>
> i'm using rpm-based distrib with patched rpm 3.0.6.
> i've got the same trouble with rpm packaging.
> in macros %configure of %build section executes command
> libtoolize --copy --force
> which overwrites 4 files from standart flac package.
> with these files building
2004 Sep 10
3
rpm building
i've tried to make rpm package of flac 0.10, but compilation
fails near start, 'cause compilator couldn't find .h files
in libFLAC directory, when it tries to build this library.
generated makefile in this directory contains "-I.$(srcdir)"
in compilator options, though it should be "-I.$(includedir)"
strange, but ./configure; make; make install
running from