search for: tuxspace

Dear Sir, Please help me in building the right solution. My requirement is: 1st I want to club both ISP bandwidth to get 512kbps. 2nd, In normal condition, it should be in Load balancing. 3rd , In ISP Failover condition, traffic will automatically route to working ISP. What I have: I have installed the RHEL 3.0 with 3 Network Card. Kernel is 2.4.21-9EL I have the link from two ISP both

...hes at >> >http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#routes depending on your kernel. You dont need >> >the Jumbo patch for load balancing and failover. The "routes" patch >> >should suffice. >> > >> >-- >> >Manish Kathuria >> >http://www.tuxspace.com/ >> Thanks Manish. >> I have download routes-2.4.20-9.diff as I have RHEL3.0 (Kernel >> 2.4.21-9EL) & apply the same. >> But the output as follows. Is this normal or any problem? >> >> # patch -p1 < routes-2.4.20-9.diff > >> Hunk #1 FAILED at...

I configured multiple isp (actually only multiple gw) according http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html. Now NAT (Internet) seems to work, both external interfaces work ( I didnt configure load balancing because I dont need it). However I have problem that I can not ping from NAT to public ip of my Linux box. Problem is that I can not connect from 192.168.1.0/24 network to services

Hi There, I am also trying to do the same for my network. I have two links from different ISPs and I want to configure a failover and load balancing Linux router. I am facing same problem here, that how to detect link failure and let Linux box switch the gateway. I know it works when the first gateway is physically down and not reachable. But what to do if my link is up but there is problem

Hi, A friend of mine has 2 lines of 512kbps terminated in two Linux boxes. He now want to remove those 2 boxes and have some device which will loadbalance the two ISPs and also have a failover arrangement. But he has agreed to give me a chance to do it on Linux for my own satisfication. Is this easy to do with lartc? How do I go about it exactly? I have very less time to do it since his

hi all. here in Lebanon,Beriut we are allowed only to use satellite for downlink only. uplink is made through a router connected to public land lines. The satellite card is a penta card. i want to distribute Internet connection to customers. such a connection i want to do on linux. but what hinders me is the configuration which i dont know how to do. so please , some one tell me how to

Hello, I have configured a load balancing router using Julian''s patches and as described in "nano.txt" for two ISP links as shown below. ISP 1 ISP 2 . . | | | | | | | WAN

What are the pros and cons of using CONNMARK along with the Multiple ISP Links and Load Balancing method as suggested in the HOWTO and with Julian''s patches for Dead Gateway Detection ? I have been observing excellent results without the CONNMARK rules. How is the performance affected if CONNMARK is used ? Thanks, Manish

Hi All, In a scenario, where a LAN is being provided internet connectivity through multiple ISPs terminated at a Load Balanced Multihomed Linux Router as described in LARTC HowTo, how would the traffic distribution affected if there is a squid based transparent proxy for the LAN''s web traffic on the same system (i.e. the load balanced router itself). The recent squid versions have

I have been successfully implementing load balancing gateways for multiple ISP links at various locations using Julian''s patches and as suggested in LARTC HowTo. At one location, one of the ISPs is providing connectivity through a PPOE DSL link which has to be dialled in everytime to connect. The gateway has been configured on a Fedora Core 3 based system and I have recompiled the