search for: tuul

...group > list, while with ldapsam I had no success in it. Quite strange in my > opinion:-( Same problem here too. In 9x the userlist is unavailable. "cannot view list of users at this time". Only share level access can be used. Seems that there's a tiny bug... Regards, Rauno Tuul

...the smb.conf # parameter username map = /etc/samba/smbusers." Doesn't that make exatly the same as listing users as admin users? Basically will samba recognize that "anything" as "admin user (root privileges)" or not? Any recommendations? solutions? Regards, Rauno Tuul

Hi ! I was just wondering if that piece of code was important (for security and such), because I had to comment it in smbldap.c before compiling samba-3.0; otherwise, I would have errors like: "(Insufficient access)smbldap_open: cannot access LDAP when not root" #ifndef NO_LDAP_SECURITY if (geteuid() != 0) { DEBUG(0, ("smbldap_open: cannot access LDAP

...administrator" account is a very bad option. Basically "administrator" account is meant to be a account of power. Restricting this isnt polite... but sharing the power to each membes is also bad and could have very bad consequences. What would be the solution? Best regards, Rauno Tuul

...new user. It has happened, that a machine account has a profile in windows server. Is there a way to modify smbldap-useradd.pl, that it would find keep in mind, which UID is the greatest and just do uid++? Or find the greatest UID and do ++. Anyone has a good idea, how to fix this? rgds, Rauno Tuul

...ldap suffix = dc=ehk,dc=lan ldap machine suffix = ou=Computers,dc=ehk,dc=lan,dc=ehk,dc=lan ldap user suffix = ou=Users,dc=ehk,dc=lan,dc=ehk,dc=lan ldap admin dn = cn=Manager,dc=ehk,dc=lan force user = %U force group = users # Unix username: khk_rauno.tuul User SID: S-1-5-21-1347305728-752463190-2852647101-3000 Primary Group SID: S-1-5-21-1347305728-752463190-2852647101-1443 # net groupmap list Domain Users (S-1-5-21-1347305728-752463190-2852647101-513) -> domain_users Users (S-1-5-21-1347305728-752463190-2852647101-1443) -> use...

...ke_server_info_sam() failed with 'NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER' Basically it finds the user in LDAP, but somehow it fails. I don't get. I also have log level 10 log files, but I can't figure much more out of them. Andrew if you want them, I can send them (gzipped logs). regards, Rauno Tuul.

...quot; will be set, with timestamp 90 days forward. $ pdbedit -P "password history" -C 3 Doesn't work. Andrew said, it isn't implemented yet. Samba doesn't store password history... I don't know how it should be done, but it would be very nice to have it. regards, Rauno Tuul > On Dec 10, 2003, at 8:28 AM, Ross McInnes (Systems) wrote: > > > Recently we were audited and as part of that they looked at > our systems > > and policies etc and produced a report. > > > > As part of that report they mentioned about forcing users to change >...

Hi, I've a samba-3.0.2a running perfectly on redhat-8. Filesystem is EXT3 with ACL support. I can't upgrade the PDC to 3.0.3 or 3.0.4, because shares are only read-only. In 3.0.3 only home share and temp share are writable. All other shares are in read-only mode. Users can see the files/directories, but can't save anything or create new items. When trying to create a new item -

...list. What is wrong? What I must change add to get it work? Is it possible? Why samba keeps looking for "Domain password server"? >From samba PDC: $ net rpc trustdom establish w2kdomain [2003/10/26 02:10:36, 0] utils/net_rpc.c:rpc_trustdom_establish(1919) Success! Regards, Rauno Tuul

...e$ dn: uid=changed-name$,ou=Computers,dc=my,dc=domain cn: changed-name$ sn: changed-name$ uid: changed-name$ uidNumber: 1285 ... sambaAcctFlags: [W ] Any suggestions? ideas? Fixes? I'm in somekind of a trouble... btw: not changing the name isn't an option :( Best regards, Rauno Tuul

...r=/etc/samba --with-logfilebase=/var/log/samba --with-quotas --with-sys-quotas --with-acl-support). I haven't tried any other rc's between 3.0.0 and 3.0.1... My smb.conf has been the same for several weeks... http://rullnokk.pri.ee/temp/smb.conf.txt Looking for some help... rgds, Rauno Tuul

...ba/2003-December/077722.html My networks WINS server is WINDOWS 2000, not samba. I had both my PDC and BDC upgraded to 3.0.1 once. The errors accessing W2K workstation went away after downgrading both samba servers to 3.0.0. Even BDC can cause these errors. hopefully this helps someone... Rauno Tuul > -----Original Message----- > From: John H. [mailto:mrmailer@myway.com] > > > I am having nearly the EXACT same problem as > http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2003-December/0 33315.html > > I have samba 3.0.1-1 rpms and fedora core 1. > > Samba is s...

Well... It worked for me. Only thing I had to do was to add writeable = yes for each share. IMHO there is a slight difference since 3.0.3, not 1.9 ;) It would be nice to mention it in changelog too. Rauno -----Original Message----- From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [mailto:jerry@samba.org] Jeff Umbach wrote: | They changed the read only default to "yes" in | versions 3.0.3 and 3.0.4.

Hello, I am also triing to set up a interdomain relationship with a NT domain and I can't create the user, I execute the following command and I get this. smbpasswd -a -i xxx New SMB password: Retype new SMB password: Failed initialise SAM_ACCOUNT for user xxx$. Failed to modify password entry for user xxx$ I have samba set up so that I can set up users and machine automatically, so I am

hi, I ran also into the home share problem, as discussed earlier in this list (http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2004-February/080593.html). But so far I haven't seen any solution. In samba 3.0.2 changelog is a line: "BUG 977: Don't create a homes share for a user if a static share already exists by the same name." I don't know what was changed, but it affected the

add to each share writeable = yes or read-only = no This Helps! Rauno -----Original Message----- From: werner maes [mailto:werner.maes@cc.kuleuven.ac.be] Sent: 11. mai 2004. a. 16:19 To: samba@samba.org Subject: [Samba] BUG: Vfs audit module & samba 3.0.4 ==> share unaccessible Hello Maybe there's a bug in samba-3.0.4. The following configuration does NO longer work. It did

...earch_suffix: Problem during the LDAP search: (unknown) (Can't contact LDAP server) Basically if 1 LDAP goes down, both SAMBA's are down. Anyone got a hint, why it doesn't work? Both SAMBA's can use any LDAP server (master or slave), if only 1 LDAP defined. Best regards, - Rauno Tuul -

...en@stuttgart.de) 10. Report to Recipient(s) (PUNEMAIL/TCSPUNE/TCS) 11. Unencrypted/encrypted passwords when connecting from Linux to Win98 (mgreis@comcast.net) 12. Your details (InfoService@microsoft.at) 13. RE: samba3 - On-the-Fly Machine Accounts - domain admin g roup? (Rauno Tuul) 14. Re: Wicked screensaver (8bengunn@aol.com) 15. Report to Recipient(s) (PUNEMAIL/TCSPUNE/TCS) 16. Response To Your Mail To FlyFree@MileSpree (autoreply@milespree.com) 17. Report to Sender (csd@volac.com) 18. Re: That movie (Becraft82@aol.com) 19. Re: Wicked screensaver (kathylf...

I've got a Samba 2.2.7a domain with an LDAP backend. It's been working for nearly 3 months now without much bother. By the way: Great work and thanks for all of the effort! I have been missing one minor thing from the setup since I moved away from NT 4: Password Expiration. In the past I have posted questions about this on the list and I've gotten two answers: "Wait for