search for: turmel

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Phil Turmel <philip at turmel.org> wrote: > On 02/01/2017 10:40 AM, Phil Turmel wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I've been running Gentoo on a ZBook with great success for a couple years, >> but I've been stymied in my attempts to implement SecureBoot by an >> apparent pro...

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108615 Bug ID: 108615 Summary: [NVE7] changing resolution causes blank screen Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Phil Turmel <philip at turmel.org> wrote: > On 02/02/2017 04:48 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Phil Turmel <philip at turmel.org> wrote: >>> On 02/01/2017 10:40 AM, Phil Turmel wrote: >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> I've be...

...bios36-undocked-mixed-native.diff diff -U3 uefi-mixed-docked-20170131-1211.boot uefi-native-docked-20170131-1209.boot >bios36-docked-mixed-native.diff # This script, the raw and filtered logs, the diffs, and kernel config and machine data have all been posted on my personal server: http://www.turmel.org/lists/nouveau/ The docked diff from mixed to native that shows the problem is attached. The kernel is self-compiled and assembled with its initramfs into a direct-bootable EFI file, following the general instructions on Greg Kroah-Hartman's blog: http://kroah.com/log/blog/2013/09/02/boot...

On 02/02/2017 04:48 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Phil Turmel <philip at turmel.org> wrote: >> On 02/01/2017 10:40 AM, Phil Turmel wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I've been running Gentoo on a ZBook with great success for a couple years, >>> but I've been stymied in my attempts to implement SecureBoot by an &...

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 5:09 PM, Phil Turmel <philip at turmel.org> wrote: > On 02/02/2017 05:01 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > >> Note that a lot of this stuff has been redone for kernel 4.10 to >> conform to atomic modesetting. I wouldn't be surprised if that >> jiggers things around enough to fix your issue. But...

On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 09:51:14 -0400 Phil Turmel via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > On 3/14/19 7:40 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski via dovecot wrote: > > > Sorry I have to write this, but this is again pointing people in a fake > > security direction. > > You should be sorry, because you are wrong. >...

Andy, This is just rude. You have been told multiple times that the less-than symbol is required to read the certificate from the file. Otherwise, the filename is parsed as if it is the certificate itself. Which yields garbage. If dovecot can't read that file, it is *not* dovecot's fault. You are simply not going to succeed until *you* figure out what security differences you have in

On 02/01/2017 10:40 AM, Phil Turmel wrote: > Hi All, > > I've been running Gentoo on a ZBook with great success for a couple years, > but I've been stymied in my attempts to implement SecureBoot by an > apparent problem with efifb to nouveaufb handoff, but only when external > monitors are attached. The ha...

On Thu, 2019-03-14 at 15:08 +0100, Stephan von Krawczynski via dovecot wrote: > On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 09:51:14 -0400 > Phil Turmel via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > > On 3/14/19 7:40 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski via dovecot wrote: > > > > > Sorry I have to write this, but this is again pointing people in a fake > > > security direction. > > > > You should be...

...ith them. So why might 2.3.1 not be able to read them? So we all need to leave this alone, for now. I'll work along, and when/if I figure it out shall return to report. I'm sure it's something simple: Easy when you know how. :-) Thanks again. Andy On Sun, 2018-12-16 at 07:41 -0500, Phil Turmel wrote: > Andy, > > This is just rude.??You have been told multiple times that the less- > than > symbol is required to read the certificate from the file.??Otherwise, > the filename is parsed as if it is the certificate itself.??Which > yields > garbage. > > If dovec...

On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 12:13:15 +0100 "Guido Goluke, MajorLabel via dovecot" <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > Op 14-03-19 om 11:46 schreef mick crane via dovecot: > > Excuse dopey question. > > I'm not exactly clear about certificates. > > Apache2 default install has this snake oil certificate > > Can make a new one for apache > > Can make one

On 02/02/2017 05:01 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > Note that a lot of this stuff has been redone for kernel 4.10 to > conform to atomic modesetting. I wouldn't be surprised if that > jiggers things around enough to fix your issue. But perhaps not. > Worth a shot. [As an aside, this would also enable more reliable > reclocking for your GPU, so not a bad upgrade to make in any case.]

On 09/28/2015 10:18 AM, Marco Fretz wrote: > On 28.09.2015 10:48, Andreas Meyer wrote: >> For my understanding it should not be possible to connect to server >> server.aaa.de with an address line user at bbb.de and dovecot serves >> the mailbox of that user. > the dovecot service does not care about the server dns name. the dns > name resolves to the IP address on the

On 3/14/19 7:40 AM, Stephan von Krawczynski via dovecot wrote: > Sorry I have to write this, but this is again pointing people in a fake > security direction. You should be sorry, because you are wrong. > The only valid authority for a certificate is the party using it. Any third > party with unknown participants cannot be a "Certificate Authority" in its > true sense.