search for: turds

On 5/18/2011 1:47 AM, Eric Christopher wrote: > On May 17, 2011, at 2:50 AM, Eric Niebler wrote: >> On 5/17/2011 2:58 AM, Eric Christopher wrote: >>> On May 14, 2011, at 3:08 AM, Eric Niebler wrote: >>> >>>> Just a heads up that the llvm build appears to be broken on cygwin. I >>>> haven't investigated, but here's the failures:

On Wed, 2018-08-08 at 05:30 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 08:07:49PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > Qemu virtio bypasses that iommu when the VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM flag > > is not set (default) but there's nothing in the device-tree to tell the > > guest about this since it's a violation of our pseries architecture, so > >

On Wed, 2018-08-08 at 05:30 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 08:07:49PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > Qemu virtio bypasses that iommu when the VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM flag > > is not set (default) but there's nothing in the device-tree to tell the > > guest about this since it's a violation of our pseries architecture, so > >

On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 11:18:13PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > Sure, but all of this is just the configuration of the iommu. But I > think we agree here, and your point remains valid, indeed my proposed > hack: > > > if ((flags & VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM) || arch_virtio_wants_dma_ops()) > > Will only work if the IOMMU and non-IOMMU path are completely

On Wed, 2018-08-08 at 23:31 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 11:18:13PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > Sure, but all of this is just the configuration of the iommu. But I > > think we agree here, and your point remains valid, indeed my proposed > > hack: > > > > > if ((flags & VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM) ||

Hi, there: I wanna use plug-in "file_column" to upload image to the server. In my test app, the view is as follow & it works well: ==================== <h1>New entry</h1> <%= error_messages_for ''entry'' %> <% form_tag ''create'', :multipart => true do -%> <p><label

...n that I could use for storing password files? Ideally, we'd avoid one large file to prevent locking issues and would also keep the passwd-file setup since it's simple. It would be possible to have the password files in a separate dir, but over time I'm guessing that would lead to nfs turds? Easy to clean up I suppose, but maybe there's a simpler solution I'm missing? George

On May 17, 2011, at 2:50 AM, Eric Niebler wrote: > On 5/17/2011 2:58 AM, Eric Christopher wrote: >> On May 14, 2011, at 3:08 AM, Eric Niebler wrote: >> >>> Just a heads up that the llvm build appears to be broken on cygwin. I >>> haven't investigated, but here's the failures: >>> >>> llvm[3]: Compiling X86ISelDAGToDAG.cpp for

Our asterisk server has been up and running for over a year and it works great. I have emails going to my account as an attachment and I can listen to them on the desktop and it works fine. I just got a T-Mobile MDA that runs Windows Pocket (or whatever they call it) and it can check email. If I have it download the email, it gets the attachment, but it can't seem to play it (it CAN

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:21 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote: > >> On Jun 1, 2016, at 7:42 AM, C Bergström via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> I still don't see why >> they can't fork it on github or create a project to let it bake and >> get some users or traction. > > The intent may be that instead of

Hi All, I've done quite a bit of research on this one and if I'm honest about the cause of this "fault" it's probably because I'm trying to do too much "outside the box" :) Nevertheless I enjoy the challenge so here is the scenario: I have a Samba Service (v3.2.5) providing file shares running on Debian 2.6. The samba server uses a Windows Domain server for

On 5/17/2011 2:58 AM, Eric Christopher wrote: > On May 14, 2011, at 3:08 AM, Eric Niebler wrote: > >> Just a heads up that the llvm build appears to be broken on cygwin. I >> haven't investigated, but here's the failures: >> >> llvm[3]: Compiling X86ISelDAGToDAG.cpp for Release+Asserts build >>

So ... I've finally tried to sort that out for powerpc and I can't find a way to make that work that isn't a complete pile of stinking shit. I'm very tempted to go back to my original idea: virtio itself should indicate it's "bypassing ability" via the virtio config space or some other bit (like the ProgIf of the PCI header etc...). I don't see how I can make

On 07/29/2015 07:40 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > >> Security is *always* opposed to convenience. > False. OS X by default runs only signed binaries, and if they come > from the App Store they run in a sandbox. User gains significant > security with this, and are completely unaware of it. There is

So ... I've finally tried to sort that out for powerpc and I can't find a way to make that work that isn't a complete pile of stinking shit. I'm very tempted to go back to my original idea: virtio itself should indicate it's "bypassing ability" via the virtio config space or some other bit (like the ProgIf of the PCI header etc...). I don't see how I can make

On Tue, 2018-08-07 at 23:31 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > You don't need to set them the time you go secure. You just need to > set the flag from the beginning on any VM you might want to go secure. > Or for simplicity just any VM - if the DT/ACPI tables exposed by > qemu are good enough that will always exclude a iommu and not set a > DMA offset, so nothing will

On Tue, 2018-08-07 at 23:31 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > You don't need to set them the time you go secure. You just need to > set the flag from the beginning on any VM you might want to go secure. > Or for simplicity just any VM - if the DT/ACPI tables exposed by > qemu are good enough that will always exclude a iommu and not set a > DMA offset, so nothing will

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org> wrote: > So ... > > I've finally tried to sort that out for powerpc and I can't find a way > to make that work that isn't a complete pile of stinking shit. > > I'm very tempted to go back to my original idea: virtio itself should > indicate it's "bypassing

Hi, Just a question, For you, what is the more reliable kernel for an asterisk prod server... Thanks

Hi T. Turtle, Did you ever get a response from this? Old Geek Son OGS ----- Original Message ----- From: Turd Turtle To: fxruby-users at rubyforge.org Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2009 6:30 PM Subject: [fxruby-users] How to install the RI doc into FXRI ? Hi, Man, this is ironic. When I typed "gem update" or something like that, so that all my gems updated, my FXRI