Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "tuncer".
2014 Apr 29
2
[LLVMdev] 3.4 branch gcc 4.9 build error
On 4/29/14, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On 2014.04.29 at 12:16 +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > On 4/29/14, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > > On 2014.04.29 at 11:04 +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > > > On 4/27/14, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > > > > On 2014.04.27 at 16:18 +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > > > > > Using gcc 4...
2014 May 15
2
[LLVMdev] 3.4 branch gcc 4.9 build error
On 15/05/2014 22:12, Tom Stellard wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 01:38:32PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 May 2014 02:25:30 +0200, Tom Stellard wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 11:48:23PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
>>>> Tom,
>>>>
>>>> now that 3.4.1 is out, any chance of a 3.4.2 with just the three
>>>> f...
2014 May 15
3
[LLVMdev] 3.4 branch gcc 4.9 build error
On Thu, 15 May 2014 02:25:30 +0200, Tom Stellard wrote:
> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 11:48:23PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > Tom,
> >
> > now that 3.4.1 is out, any chance of a 3.4.2 with just the three
> > fixes or at least merging them to the 3.4 branch?
>
> I've pushed the two approved patches to the 3.4 branch, can you
> verify that they work with gcc 4.9.
Thanks,...
2014 May 10
3
[LLVMdev] 3.4 branch gcc 4.9 build error
Tom,
now that 3.4.1 is out, any chance of a 3.4.2 with just the
three fixes or at least merging them to the 3.4 branch?
2014 May 15
2
[LLVMdev] 3.4 branch gcc 4.9 build error
On 15/05/2014 22:52, Tom Stellard wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:41:08PM +0300, Alp Toker wrote:
>> On 15/05/2014 22:12, Tom Stellard wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 01:38:32PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 15 May 2014 02:25:30 +0200, Tom Stellard wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 11:48:23PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
>>>>>> Tom,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> now that 3.4.1 is out, any chance o...
2014 May 02
2
[LLVMdev] 3.4 branch gcc 4.9 build error
On 02/05/2014 20:45, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> Bump.
>
> Is it really unsupported to build llvm from scratch with gcc 4.9 and
> libstdc++ 4.9? Should I file a bugzilla ticket instead?
Obviously LLVM/clang should compile out of the box using the current
stable GCC version, and failure to do so would be a potential rel...
2014 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] 3.4 branch gcc 4.9 build error
Using gcc 4.9 to build the llvm 3.4 branch fails with the following error:
llvm[1]: Compiling APFloat.cpp for Release build
[...]
/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.9.0/../../../../include/c++/4.9.0/cstddef:51:11:
error: no member named 'max_align_t' in the global namespace
using ::max_align_t;
~~^
gcc 4.8.2's caused no such issue, so it must be a change in
2014 May 05
3
[LLVMdev] 3.4 branch gcc 4.9 build error
On 04/05/2014 02:30, Tom Stellard wrote:
> On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 12:32:02AM +0100, Alp Toker wrote:
>> On 02/05/2014 20:45, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
>>> Bump.
>>>
>>> Is it really unsupported to build llvm from scratch with gcc 4.9 and
>>> libstdc++ 4.9? Should I file a bugzilla ticket instead?
>> Obviously LLVM/clang should compile out of the box using the current
>> stable GCC versio...