search for: tun_sock

...+ + if (!tun) + return -EBADFD; + len = iov_length(iv, count); + if (len < 0) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto out; + } + + ret = tun_do_read(tun, iocb, iv, len, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK); + ret = min_t(ssize_t, ret, len); out: tun_put(tun); return ret; @@ -847,7 +860,8 @@ static void tun_sock_write_space(struct sock *sk) return; if (sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep)) - wake_up_interruptible_sync(sk->sk_sleep); + wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(sk->sk_sleep, POLLOUT | + POLLWRNORM | POLLWRBAND); tun = container_of(sk, struct tun_sock, sk...

...+ + if (!tun) + return -EBADFD; + len = iov_length(iv, count); + if (len < 0) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto out; + } + + ret = tun_do_read(tun, iocb, iv, len, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK); + ret = min_t(ssize_t, ret, len); out: tun_put(tun); return ret; @@ -847,7 +860,8 @@ static void tun_sock_write_space(struct sock *sk) return; if (sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep)) - wake_up_interruptible_sync(sk->sk_sleep); + wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(sk->sk_sleep, POLLOUT | + POLLWRNORM | POLLWRBAND); tun = container_of(sk, struct tun_sock, sk...

...+ + if (!tun) + return -EBADFD; + len = iov_length(iv, count); + if (len < 0) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto out; + } + + ret = tun_do_read(tun, iocb, iv, len, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK); + ret = min_t(ssize_t, ret, len); out: tun_put(tun); return ret; @@ -847,7 +860,8 @@ static void tun_sock_write_space(struct sock *sk) return; if (sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep)) - wake_up_interruptible_sync(sk->sk_sleep); + wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(sk->sk_sleep, POLLOUT | + POLLWRNORM | POLLWRBAND); tun = container_of(sk, struct tun_sock, sk...

...+ + if (!tun) + return -EBADFD; + len = iov_length(iv, count); + if (len < 0) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto out; + } + + ret = tun_do_read(tun, iocb, iv, len, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK); + ret = min_t(ssize_t, ret, len); out: tun_put(tun); return ret; @@ -847,7 +860,8 @@ static void tun_sock_write_space(struct sock *sk) return; if (sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep)) - wake_up_interruptible_sync(sk->sk_sleep); + wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(sk->sk_sleep, POLLOUT | + POLLWRNORM | POLLWRBAND); tun = container_of(sk, struct tun_sock, sk...

...+ + if (!tun) + return -EBADFD; + len = iov_length(iv, count); + if (len < 0) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto out; + } + + ret = tun_do_read(tun, iocb, iv, len, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK); + ret = min_t(ssize_t, ret, len); out: tun_put(tun); return ret; @@ -847,7 +860,8 @@ static void tun_sock_write_space(struct sock *sk) return; if (sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep)) - wake_up_interruptible_sync(sk->sk_sleep); + wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(sk->sk_sleep, POLLOUT | + POLLWRNORM | POLLWRBAND); tun = container_of(sk, struct tun_sock, sk...

...+ + if (!tun) + return -EBADFD; + len = iov_length(iv, count); + if (len < 0) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto out; + } + + ret = tun_do_read(tun, iocb, iv, len, file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK); + ret = min_t(ssize_t, ret, len); out: tun_put(tun); return ret; @@ -847,7 +860,8 @@ static void tun_sock_write_space(struct sock *sk) return; if (sk->sk_sleep && waitqueue_active(sk->sk_sleep)) - wake_up_interruptible_sync(sk->sk_sleep); + wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(sk->sk_sleep, POLLOUT | + POLLWRNORM | POLLWRBAND); tun = container_of(sk, struct tun_sock, sk...

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 01:08:18AM -0000, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:38:34PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > > > > So how about this? We replace the dev destructor with our own that > > doesn't immediately call free_netdev. We only call free_netdev once > > all tun fd's attached to the device have been closed. > > Here's the patch.

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 01:08:18AM -0000, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:38:34PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > > > > So how about this? We replace the dev destructor with our own that > > doesn't immediately call free_netdev. We only call free_netdev once > > all tun fd's attached to the device have been closed. > > Here's the patch.

fre, 27 03 2009 kl. 10:22 +1030, skrev Rusty Russell: > From: Matias Zabaljauregui <zabaljauregui at gmail.com> > > Impact: cleanup > > This patch allow us to use KVM hypercalls Something has broken in relation to this change. I'm not sure it is this change itself or one following, but I get the following error when using lguest: lguest: unhandled trap 6 at 0x418726

fre, 27 03 2009 kl. 10:22 +1030, skrev Rusty Russell: > From: Matias Zabaljauregui <zabaljauregui at gmail.com> > > Impact: cleanup > > This patch allow us to use KVM hypercalls Something has broken in relation to this change. I'm not sure it is this change itself or one following, but I get the following error when using lguest: lguest: unhandled trap 6 at 0x418726

As multi-queue nics were commonly used for high-end servers, current single queue based tap can not satisfy the requirement of scaling guest network performance as the numbers of vcpus increase. So the following series implements multiple queue support in tun/tap. In order to take advantages of this, a multi-queue capable driver and qemu were also needed. I just rebase the latest version of

As multi-queue nics were commonly used for high-end servers, current single queue based tap can not satisfy the requirement of scaling guest network performance as the numbers of vcpus increase. So the following series implements multiple queue support in tun/tap. In order to take advantages of this, a multi-queue capable driver and qemu were also needed. I just rebase the latest version of

multiple queue virtio-net: flow steering through host/guest cooperation Hello all: This is a rough series adds the guest/host cooperation of flow steering support based on Krish Kumar's multiple queue virtio-net driver patch 3/3 (http://lwn.net/Articles/467283/). This idea is simple, the backend pass the rxhash to the guest and guest would tell the backend the hash to queue mapping when

multiple queue virtio-net: flow steering through host/guest cooperation Hello all: This is a rough series adds the guest/host cooperation of flow steering support based on Krish Kumar's multiple queue virtio-net driver patch 3/3 (http://lwn.net/Articles/467283/). This idea is simple, the backend pass the rxhash to the guest and guest would tell the backend the hash to queue mapping when