search for: tun_queue_purg

...gt; }; > struct list_head next; > struct tun_struct *detached; > + struct skb_array tx_array; > }; > > struct tun_flow_entry { > @@ -513,8 +516,15 @@ static struct tun_struct *tun_enable_queue(struct tun_file *tfile) > return tun; > } > > -static void tun_queue_purge(struct tun_file *tfile) > +static void tun_queue_purge(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile) > { > + struct sk_buff *skb; > + > + if (tun->flags & IFF_TX_ARRAY) { > + while ((skb = skb_array_consume(&tfile->tx_array)) != NULL) > + kfree_skb(skb); &g...

...{ u64 rx_packets; @@ -167,6 +169,7 @@ struct tun_file { }; struct list_head next; struct tun_struct *detached; + struct skb_array tx_array; }; struct tun_flow_entry { @@ -513,8 +516,15 @@ static struct tun_struct *tun_enable_queue(struct tun_file *tfile) return tun; } -static void tun_queue_purge(struct tun_file *tfile) +static void tun_queue_purge(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile) { + struct sk_buff *skb; + + if (tun->flags & IFF_TX_ARRAY) { + while ((skb = skb_array_consume(&tfile->tx_array)) != NULL) + kfree_skb(skb); + } + skb_queue_purge(&tfile-&g...

...{ u64 rx_packets; @@ -167,6 +169,7 @@ struct tun_file { }; struct list_head next; struct tun_struct *detached; + struct skb_array tx_array; }; struct tun_flow_entry { @@ -513,8 +516,15 @@ static struct tun_struct *tun_enable_queue(struct tun_file *tfile) return tun; } -static void tun_queue_purge(struct tun_file *tfile) +static void tun_queue_purge(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile) { + struct sk_buff *skb; + + if (tun->flags & IFF_TX_ARRAY) { + while ((skb = skb_array_consume(&tfile->tx_array)) != NULL) + kfree_skb(skb); + } + skb_queue_purge(&tfile-&g...

...*tun_enable_queue(struct tun_file *tfile) return tun; } -static void tun_ptr_free(void *ptr) +void tun_ptr_free(void *ptr) { if (!ptr) return; @@ -667,6 +667,7 @@ static void tun_ptr_free(void *ptr) __skb_array_destroy_skb(ptr); } } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tun_ptr_free); static void tun_queue_purge(struct tun_file *tfile) { diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c index 610cba2..54a138f 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ static void vhost_net_buf_unproduce(struct vhost_net_virtqueue *nvq) if (nvq->rx_ring && !vhost_net_b...

...un.c @@ -75,6 +75,10 @@ #include <linux/uaccess.h> +static int rx_batched; +module_param(rx_batched, int, 0444); +MODULE_PARM_DESC(rx_batched, "Number of packets batched in rx"); + /* Uncomment to enable debugging */ /* #define TUN_DEBUG 1 */ @@ -522,6 +526,7 @@ static void tun_queue_purge(struct tun_file *tfile) while ((skb = skb_array_consume(&tfile->tx_array)) != NULL) kfree_skb(skb); + skb_queue_purge(&tfile->sk.sk_write_queue); skb_queue_purge(&tfile->sk.sk_error_queue); } @@ -1140,10 +1145,36 @@ static struct sk_buff *tun_alloc_skb(struct tun_f...

...un.c @@ -75,6 +75,10 @@ #include <linux/uaccess.h> +static int rx_batched; +module_param(rx_batched, int, 0444); +MODULE_PARM_DESC(rx_batched, "Number of packets batched in rx"); + /* Uncomment to enable debugging */ /* #define TUN_DEBUG 1 */ @@ -522,6 +526,7 @@ static void tun_queue_purge(struct tun_file *tfile) while ((skb = skb_array_consume(&tfile->tx_array)) != NULL) kfree_skb(skb); + skb_queue_purge(&tfile->sk.sk_write_queue); skb_queue_purge(&tfile->sk.sk_error_queue); } @@ -1140,10 +1145,44 @@ static struct sk_buff *tun_alloc_skb(struct tun_f...

...vers/net/tun.c index 8c1d3bd..13890ac 100644 --- a/drivers/net/tun.c +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c @@ -218,6 +218,7 @@ struct tun_struct { struct list_head disabled; void *security; u32 flow_count; + u32 rx_batched; struct tun_pcpu_stats __percpu *pcpu_stats; }; @@ -522,6 +523,7 @@ static void tun_queue_purge(struct tun_file *tfile) while ((skb = skb_array_consume(&tfile->tx_array)) != NULL) kfree_skb(skb); + skb_queue_purge(&tfile->sk.sk_write_queue); skb_queue_purge(&tfile->sk.sk_error_queue); } @@ -1139,10 +1141,46 @@ static struct sk_buff *tun_alloc_skb(struct tun_f...

...vers/net/tun.c index cd8e02c..6c93926 100644 --- a/drivers/net/tun.c +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c @@ -218,6 +218,7 @@ struct tun_struct { struct list_head disabled; void *security; u32 flow_count; + u32 rx_batched; struct tun_pcpu_stats __percpu *pcpu_stats; }; @@ -522,6 +523,7 @@ static void tun_queue_purge(struct tun_file *tfile) while ((skb = skb_array_consume(&tfile->tx_array)) != NULL) kfree_skb(skb); + skb_queue_purge(&tfile->sk.sk_write_queue); skb_queue_purge(&tfile->sk.sk_error_queue); } @@ -1140,10 +1142,45 @@ static struct sk_buff *tun_alloc_skb(struct tun_f...

Hi: This series tries to implement tx batching support for vhost. This was done by using MSG_MORE as a hint for under layer socket. The backend (e.g tap) can then batch the packets temporarily in a list and submit it all once the number of bacthed exceeds a limitation. Tests shows obvious improvement on guest pktgen over over mlx4(noqueue) on host: Mpps -+%

Hi: This series tries to implement tx batching support for vhost. This was done by using MSG_MORE as a hint for under layer socket. The backend (e.g tap) can then batch the packets temporarily in a list and submit it all once the number of bacthed exceeds a limitation. Tests shows obvious improvement on guest pktgen over over mlx4(noqueue) on host: Mpps -+%

Hi: This series tries to implement tx batching support for vhost. This was done by using MSG_MORE as a hint for under layer socket. The backend (e.g tap) can then batch the packets temporarily in a list and submit it all once the number of bacthed exceeds a limitation. Tests shows obvious improvement on guest pktgen over over mlx4(noqueue) on host: Mpps -+%

Hi: This series tries to implement tx batching support for vhost. This was done by using MSG_MORE as a hint for under layer socket. The backend (e.g tap) can then batch the packets temporarily in a list and submit it all once the number of bacthed exceeds a limitation. Tests shows obvious improvement on guest pktgen over over mlx4(noqueue) on host: Mpps -+%

.../drivers/net/tun.c > +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c > @@ -218,6 +218,7 @@ struct tun_struct { > struct list_head disabled; > void *security; > u32 flow_count; > + u32 rx_batched; > struct tun_pcpu_stats __percpu *pcpu_stats; > }; > > @@ -522,6 +523,7 @@ static void tun_queue_purge(struct tun_file *tfile) > while ((skb = skb_array_consume(&tfile->tx_array)) != NULL) > kfree_skb(skb); > > + skb_queue_purge(&tfile->sk.sk_write_queue); > skb_queue_purge(&tfile->sk.sk_error_queue); > } > > @@ -1140,10 +1142,45 @@ static st...

.../drivers/net/tun.c > +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c > @@ -218,6 +218,7 @@ struct tun_struct { > struct list_head disabled; > void *security; > u32 flow_count; > + u32 rx_batched; > struct tun_pcpu_stats __percpu *pcpu_stats; > }; > > @@ -522,6 +523,7 @@ static void tun_queue_purge(struct tun_file *tfile) > while ((skb = skb_array_consume(&tfile->tx_array)) != NULL) > kfree_skb(skb); > > + skb_queue_purge(&tfile->sk.sk_write_queue); > skb_queue_purge(&tfile->sk.sk_error_queue); > } > > @@ -1140,10 +1142,45 @@ static st...

...; #include <asm/uaccess.h> @@ -167,6 +168,7 @@ struct tun_file { }; struct list_head next; struct tun_struct *detached; + struct skb_array tx_array; }; struct tun_flow_entry { @@ -515,7 +517,11 @@ static struct tun_struct *tun_enable_queue(struct tun_file *tfile) static void tun_queue_purge(struct tun_file *tfile) { - skb_queue_purge(&tfile->sk.sk_receive_queue); + struct sk_buff *skb; + + while ((skb = skb_array_consume(&tfile->tx_array)) != NULL) + kfree_skb(skb); + skb_queue_purge(&tfile->sk.sk_error_queue); } @@ -560,6 +566,8 @@ static void __tun_detac...

Hi: This series tries to implement tx batching support for vhost. This was done by using MSG_MORE as a hint for under layer socket. The backend (e.g tap) can then batch the packets temporarily in a list and submit it all once the number of bacthed exceeds a limitation. Tests shows obvious improvement on guest pktgen over over mlx4(noqueue) on host: Mpps -+%

Hi: This series tries to implement tx batching support for vhost. This was done by using MSG_MORE as a hint for under layer socket. The backend (e.g tap) can then batch the packets temporarily in a list and submit it all once the number of bacthed exceeds a limitation. Tests shows obvious improvement on guest pktgen over over mlx4(noqueue) on host: Mpps -+%

Hi: This series tries to implement tx batching support for vhost. This was done by using MSG_MORE as a hint for under layer socket. The backend (e.g tap) can then batch the packets temporarily in a list and submit it all once the number of bacthed exceeds a limitation. Tests shows obvious improvement on guest pktgen over over mlx4(noqueue) on host: Mpps -+%

Hi: This series tries to implement tx batching support for vhost. This was done by using MSG_MORE as a hint for under layer socket. The backend (e.g tap) can then batch the packets temporarily in a list and submit it all once the number of bacthed exceeds a limitation. Tests shows obvious improvement on guest pktgen over over mlx4(noqueue) on host: Mpps -+%

Hi: This small series try to fix several bugs of ptr_ring usage in vhost_net. Please review. Thanks Alexander Potapenko (1): vhost_net: initialize rx_ring in vhost_net_open() Jason Wang (2): vhost_net: keep private_data and rx_ring synced vhost_net: examine pointer types during un-producing drivers/net/tun.c | 3 ++- drivers/vhost/net.c | 8 +++++--- include/linux/if_tun.h | 4