search for: tun_notifier_block

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "tun_notifier_block".

2016 Jun 30
0
[PATCH net-next V3 6/6] tun: switch to use skb array for tx
...net_device *dev = netdev_notifier_info_to_dev(ptr); + struct tun_struct *tun = netdev_priv(dev); + + switch (event) { + case NETDEV_CHANGE_TX_QUEUE_LEN: + if (tun_queue_resize(tun)) + return NOTIFY_BAD; + break; + default: + break; + } + + return NOTIFY_DONE; +} + +static struct notifier_block tun_notifier_block __read_mostly = { + .notifier_call = tun_device_event, +}; static int __init tun_init(void) { @@ -2416,6 +2535,8 @@ static int __init tun_init(void) pr_err("Can't register misc device %d\n", TUN_MINOR); goto err_misc; } + + register_netdevice_notifier(&tun_notifier_blo...
2016 Jun 30
9
[PATCH net-next V3 0/6] switch to use tx skb array in tun
Hi all: This series tries to switch to use skb array in tun. This is used to eliminate the spinlock contention between producer and consumer. The conversion was straightforward: just introdce a tx skb array and use it instead of sk_receive_queue. A minor issue is to keep the tx_queue_len behaviour, since tun used to use it for the length of sk_receive_queue. This is done through: - add the
2016 Jun 30
9
[PATCH net-next V3 0/6] switch to use tx skb array in tun
Hi all: This series tries to switch to use skb array in tun. This is used to eliminate the spinlock contention between producer and consumer. The conversion was straightforward: just introdce a tx skb array and use it instead of sk_receive_queue. A minor issue is to keep the tx_queue_len behaviour, since tun used to use it for the length of sk_receive_queue. This is done through: - add the
2016 Jun 30
10
[PATCH net-next V4 0/6] switch to use tx skb array in tun
Hi all: This series tries to switch to use skb array in tun. This is used to eliminate the spinlock contention between producer and consumer. The conversion was straightforward: just introdce a tx skb array and use it instead of sk_receive_queue. A minor issue is to keep the tx_queue_len behaviour, since tun used to use it for the length of sk_receive_queue. This is done through: - add the
2016 Jun 30
10
[PATCH net-next V4 0/6] switch to use tx skb array in tun
Hi all: This series tries to switch to use skb array in tun. This is used to eliminate the spinlock contention between producer and consumer. The conversion was straightforward: just introdce a tx skb array and use it instead of sk_receive_queue. A minor issue is to keep the tx_queue_len behaviour, since tun used to use it for the length of sk_receive_queue. This is done through: - add the