Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "tubfs".
Did you mean:
tubes
2019 Nov 06
2
samba performance when writing lots of small files
...0-18-generic #19-Ubuntu SMP Tue Oct 8 20:14:06 UTC
2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
root at plattentest:~# dpkg -l samba
[?]
ii samba 2:4.10.7+dfsg-0ubuntu3 amd64 SMB/CIFS file,
print, and login server for Unix
root at plattentest:~# time for s in $(seq 0 9999); do echo $s >
/tubfs/test/10.000/test-$s; done # this directory is a cephfs mount
real 0m5.921s
user 0m0.515s
sys 0m0.861s
root at plattentest:~# time for s in $(seq 0 9999); do echo $s >
/mnt/10.000-cifs/test-$s; done # this is the former re-exported via samba
real 13m27.317s
user 0m0.881s
sys 0m6.326s...
2019 Nov 06
0
samba performance when writing lots of small files
...8 20:14:06 UTC
> 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> root at plattentest:~# dpkg -l samba
> [?]
> ii samba 2:4.10.7+dfsg-0ubuntu3 amd64 SMB/CIFS file,
> print, and login server for Unix
> root at plattentest:~# time for s in $(seq 0 9999); do echo $s >
> /tubfs/test/10.000/test-$s; done # this directory is a cephfs mount
>
> real 0m5.921s
> user 0m0.515s
> sys 0m0.861s
> root at plattentest:~# time for s in $(seq 0 9999); do echo $s >
> /mnt/10.000-cifs/test-$s; done # this is the former re-exported via samba
>
> real 13m27...
2019 Sep 25
2
samba performance when writing lots of small files
hi there,
running a simple test like
time for s in $(seq 0 9999); do echo hello > world-$s; done
takes a little more than a minute on a locally mounted test share on our
samba server. the same test finishes in about 5 seconds when it is run
on the server's file system, without samba.
i understand that dealing with many small files isn't exactly the sweet
spot of any (networked) file
2009 Jul 23
1
[PATCH server] changes required for fedora rawhide inclusion.
Signed-off-by: Scott Seago <sseago at redhat.com>
---
AUTHORS | 17 ++++++
README | 10 +++
conf/ovirt-agent | 12 ++++
conf/ovirt-db-omatic | 12 ++++
conf/ovirt-host-browser | 12 ++++