Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "tual".
Did you mean:
dual
2004 May 29
0
[Bug 104] Bytes/packets counters sometimes give incorrect values
...size of the table.
Then iptables allocates memory and calls getsockopt() again but with
SO_GET_ENTRIES to get the table, and it passes in the size it got from the first
getsockopt() call. SO_GET_ENTRIES also locks the table, then it calls
get_entries() which compares the passed in size with the ac tual current size of
the table and returns -EINVAL if they don't match.
I checked and that's what happens. A simple loop that adds/removes rules at the
same time as one try to list the rules reproduces it easily.
SO_GET_INFO unlocks the table after it's done and then a rule is either added...
2012 Sep 20
1
[LLVMdev] Handling of unsafe functions
...community? Can you also
> comment if the approach specified is good to address this issue?
>
>
>
> References:
>
> [1] http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms235384(v=vs.80).aspx
>
> [2]
> https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#documentation/Security/Concep
> tual/SecureCodingGuide/Articles/BufferOverflows.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
2010 Nov 08
8
Any limit on pool hierarchy?
Folks,
>From zfs documentation, it appears that a "vdev" can be built from more vdevs. That is, a raidz vdev can be built across a bunch of mirrored vdevs, and a mirror can be built across a few raidz vdevs.
Is my understanding correct? Also, is there a limit on the depth of a vdev?
Thank you in advance for your help.
Regards,
Peter
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
2002 Mar 25
3
Offtopic: 3ware Raid Controllers
Hi!
I know this is a little bit offtopic, but i couldn't think of any other
place where i can get uninfluenced first hand information on these
controllers :)
I've read about and experienced data loss/system lockup with older 3ware
controllers, but the 3ware Escalade 7xxx (i'm especially interested in the
7850) sounds too good to ignore it (8 channels, 8 drives, raid 0/1/5/10,
2011 Apr 06
7
[LLVMdev] GSoC 2011: Superoptimization for LLVM IR
...nd LLVM code.
References
[1] Sorav Bansal and Alex Aiken. Automatic generation of peephole superopti-
mizers. SIGPLAN Not., 41:394–403, October 2006.
[2] Henry Massalin. Superoptimizer: a look at the smallest program. In
ASPLOS-II: Proceedings of the second international conference on Architec-
tual support for programming languages and operating systems, pages 122–
126, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 1987. IEEE Computer Society Press.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110406/2161e6bb/attachment.ht...
2012 Sep 19
0
[LLVMdev] Handling of unsafe functions
...he LLVM community? Can you also comment if
> the approach specified is good to address this issue?
>
>
>
> References:
>
> [1] http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms235384(v=vs.80).aspx
>
> [2]
> https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#documentation/Security/Conceptual/SecureCodingGuide/Articles/BufferOverflows.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
2012 Sep 19
7
[LLVMdev] Handling of unsafe functions
...odified.
Is this proposal of interest to the LLVM community? Can you also comment if the approach specified is good to address this issue?
References:
[1] http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms235384(v=vs.80).aspx
[2] https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#documentation/Security/Conceptual/SecureCodingGuide/Articles/BufferOverflows.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120919/7de4688a/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed.....
2012 Sep 19
0
[LLVMdev] Handling of unsafe functions
...interest to the LLVM community? Can you also comment
> if the approach specified is good to address this issue?
Personally, I'm not particularly interested in blanket replacement of
memcpy with memcpy_s in the hopes that it might close a security hole. I
am very interested in fixing any actual bugs. If it's easier to fix real
bugs by aggressively using this additional layer, then that may well be
the way to go, but before I agree to that, I've got a ton of questions
to answer first.
What's the current error rate? How often are we seeing bugs in llvm that
would be fixed i...