search for: ttm_resv

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "ttm_resv".

2019 Jun 17
2
[PATCH 1/4] drm/virtio: pass gem reservation object to ttm init
With this gem and ttm will use the same reservation object, so mixing and matching ttm / gem reservation helpers should work fine. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_object.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_object.c index
2019 Jun 17
2
[PATCH 1/4] drm/virtio: pass gem reservation object to ttm init
With this gem and ttm will use the same reservation object, so mixing and matching ttm / gem reservation helpers should work fine. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_object.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_object.c index
2019 Jul 25
1
[PATCH 2/4] drm/nouveau: Fill out gem_object->resv
...solutely needs the right reservation object all the boilerplate is already there and we just have to wire it up correctly. Note that gem/prime doesn't care when we do this, as long as we do it before the bo is registered and someone can call the handle2fd ioctl on it. Aside: ttm_buffer_object.ttm_resv could probably be ditched in favour of always passing a non-NULL resv to ttm_bo_init(). At least for gem drivers that would avoid having two of these, on in ttm_buffer_object and the other in drm_gem_object, one just there for confusion. Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> Cc: Ger...
2019 Jun 17
0
[PATCH 1/4] drm/virtio: pass gem reservation object to ttm init
...e same reservation object, > so mixing and matching ttm / gem reservation helpers should > work fine. > > Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> While doing my prime doc+cleanup series I wondered whether we should do this for everyone, and perhaps even remove ttm_bo.ttm_resv. Only driver which doesn't yet have a gem_bo embedded in the same allocation is vmwgfx, and that would be easy to fix by adding a vmwgfx_resv somehwere. Anyway, looks like a solid start into the convergence story. Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> > --- > dr...
2019 Jun 14
0
[PATCH 52/59] drm/nouveau: Fill out gem_object->resv
...solutely needs the right reservation object all the boilerplate is already there and we just have to wire it up correctly. Note that gem/prime doesn't care when we do this, as long as we do it before the bo is registered and someone can call the handle2fd ioctl on it. Aside: ttm_buffer_object.ttm_resv could probably be ditched in favour of always passing a non-NULL resv to ttm_bo_init(). At least for gem drivers that would avoid having two of these, on in ttm_buffer_object and the other in drm_gem_object, one just there for confusion. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com&...
2019 Jun 25
0
[PATCH 5/7] drm/nouveau: Fill out gem_object->resv
...solutely needs the right reservation object all the boilerplate is already there and we just have to wire it up correctly. Note that gem/prime doesn't care when we do this, as long as we do it before the bo is registered and someone can call the handle2fd ioctl on it. Aside: ttm_buffer_object.ttm_resv could probably be ditched in favour of always passing a non-NULL resv to ttm_bo_init(). At least for gem drivers that would avoid having two of these, on in ttm_buffer_object and the other in drm_gem_object, one just there for confusion. Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov at collabora.com&...