search for: tterrib

...he > > revised > > > patch: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:20 PM Timothy > > B. Terriberry > > > > > <tterribe at xiph.org > > <mailto:tterribe at xiph.org> <mailto:tterribe at xiph.org > > <mailto:tterribe at xiph.org>> > > > <mailto:tterribe at xiph.org <mailto:tterribe at xiph.org> > > <mailto:tterribe at xi...

... >         patch: > >         >         >     >     > > >         >         >     >     > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:20 > PM Timothy > >         B. Terriberry > >         >         >     >     <tterribe at xiph.org > <mailto:tterribe at xiph.org> > >         <mailto:tterribe at xiph.org <mailto:tterribe at xiph.org>> > <mailto:tterribe at xiph.org <mailto:tterribe at xiph.org> > >         <mailto:tterribe at xiph.org...

...ll your feedback. here's the > revised > >         patch: > >         >     >     > > >         >     >     > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:20 PM Timothy > B. Terriberry > >         >     >     <tterribe at xiph.org > <mailto:tterribe at xiph.org> <mailto:tterribe at xiph.org > <mailto:tterribe at xiph.org>> > >         <mailto:tterribe at xiph.org <mailto:tterribe at xiph.org> > <mailto:tterribe at xiph.org <mailto:tt...

...revised >> > > patch: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:20 PM Timothy >> > B. Terriberry >> > > > > <tterribe at xiph.org >> > <mailto:tterribe at xiph.org> <mailto:tterribe at xiph.org >> > <mailto:tterribe at xiph.org>> >> > > <mailto:tterribe at xiph.org <mailto:tterribe at xiph.org> >> > <mailt...

...missing a va_end() call. > Done. > > > Cheers, > > Jean-Marc > > > > On 10/12/2017 05:44 PM, Drew Allen wrote: > > thanks for all your feedback. here's the revised patch: > > > > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:20 PM Timothy B. Terriberry <tterribe at xiph.org > > <mailto:tterribe at xiph.org>> wrote: > > > > Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > > > I think you'll want something like: > > > (opus_int16)((unsigned)demixing_matrix[2*i+1] << 8) > > > (though you might want to c...

.../kiss_fft.c:507:51: warning: unused parameter 'arch' [-Wunused-parameter] void opus_fft_free(const kiss_fft_state *cfg, int arch) ^ CCLD celt/tests/test_unit_dft celt/tests/test_unit_dft.o: In function `_celt_autocorr': /home/tterribe/src/xiph/git/xiph/opus/build/../celt/celt_lpc.c:285: undefined reference to `CELT_PITCH_XCORR_IMPL' /home/tterribe/src/xiph/git/xiph/opus/build/../celt/celt_lpc.c:285: undefined reference to `CELT_PITCH_XCORR_IMPL' celt/tests/test_unit_dft.o: In function `pitch_search': /home/tterrib...

...7 05:44 PM, Drew Allen wrote: > >     >     > thanks for all your feedback. here's the revised > patch: > >     >     > > >     >     > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:20 PM Timothy B. Terriberry > >     >     <tterribe at xiph.org <mailto:tterribe at xiph.org> > <mailto:tterribe at xiph.org <mailto:tterribe at xiph.org>> > >     <mailto:tterribe at xiph.org <mailto:tterribe at xiph.org> > <mailto:tterribe at xiph.org <mailto:tterribe at xiph.or...

On 25 February 2015 at 19:54, Timothy B. Terriberry <tterribe at xiph.org> wrote: > Viswanath Puttagunta wrote: >> >> Can we please have review on RFCv2? We have quite a few optimizations >> (Eg: ifft/mdct_backwards, fixed point fft/ifft mdct_forward/backward >> etc) that are in my pipeline that depend on this patch series being...

...t; Jean-Marc > > > > > > > > On 10/12/2017 05:44 PM, Drew Allen wrote: > > > thanks for all your feedback. here's the revised patch: > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:20 PM Timothy B. Terriberry > > <tterribe at xiph.org <mailto:tterribe at xiph.org> > > > <mailto:tterribe at xiph.org <mailto:tterribe at xiph.org>>> wrote: > > > > > > Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > > > > I think you'll want something like: > > &...

...know how much we care about 16-bit platforms. And accuracy should not matter. On the other hand, a 64-bit implementation is much cleaner/shorter, which is always a good argument :-) All in all, no strong preference from my side. koen. On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Timothy B. Terriberry <tterribe at xiph.org> wrote: > KOEN VOS wrote: > >> current implementation is faster on a 32 or 16 bit processor. If you >> would find the opposite to be true (ie that a 64 bit implementation is >> faster on, say, a 32 bit ARM CPU) then perhaps we should reconsider. >> &g...

...ll in all, I am not sure it is worth the hassle though considering this is only about 1/order of the cost of the autocorrelation? Marcello From: KOEN VOS <koenvos74 at gmail.com<mailto:koenvos74 at gmail.com>> Date: Friday, 20 June 2014 22:04 To: "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterribe at xiph.org<mailto:tterribe at xiph.org>> Cc: "opus at xiph.org<mailto:opus at xiph.org>" <opus at xiph.org<mailto:opus at xiph.org>>, Marcello Caramma <mcaramma at cisco.com<mailto:mcaramma at cisco.com>> Subject: Re: [opus] Alleged bug in Silk cod...

...> > > Cheers, > >         Jean-Marc > > > > On 10/12/2017 05:44 PM, Drew Allen wrote: > > thanks for all your feedback. here's the revised patch: > > > > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:20 PM Timothy B. Terriberry > <tterribe at xiph.org <mailto:tterribe at xiph.org> > > <mailto:tterribe at xiph.org <mailto:tterribe at xiph.org>>> wrote: > > > >     Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > >     > I think you'll want something like: > >     > (opus_int16)...

On 21 November 2014 at 18:06, Timothy B. Terriberry <tterribe at xiph.org> wrote: > > Viswanath Puttagunta wrote: >> >> a. Simplest use case to validate this optimization for correctness. >> b. Simplest use case to validate this optimization for performance. >> >> Would prefer something like opusdec that can be executed...

thanks for all your feedback. here's the revised patch: On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:20 PM Timothy B. Terriberry <tterribe at xiph.org> wrote: > Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > > I think you'll want something like: > > (opus_int16)((unsigned)demixing_matrix[2*i+1] << 8) > > (though you might want to check it too) > > FWIW, we use the construct > int s = buf[2*i + 1] << 8 |...

...at riscogroup.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: opus <opus-bounces at xiph.org> On Behalf Of Timothy B. Terriberry > Sent: Tuesday, 4 June 2024 13:17 > To: opus at xiph.org > Subject: Re: [opus] opus library issues > > [You don't often get email from tterribe at xiph.org. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] > > Leonid Shigris wrote: > > Is there a situation thatsilk frame corruption causes to system crash? > > The library is able to decode corrupt frames without crashing. > _______________...

Hello, I had talked earlier with 'Timothy B. Terriberry' <tterribe at xiph.org>, about adding support for AVX instructions in Opus, but since he appears to be busy I would like to resend this on the mailing list. I've created a pull request https://github.com/xiph/opus/pull/5 to add the testing infrastructure for the changes before adding the actual code....

...st Regards, Phil Wang > Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 17:41:22 -0600 > From: Viswanath Puttagunta <viswanath.puttagunta at linaro.org> > Subject: Re: [opus] [RFC PATCH v1 2/2] armv7(float): Optimize encode > usecase using NE10 library > To: "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterribe at xiph.org> > Cc: "opus at xiph.org" <opus at xiph.org> > Message-ID: > <CAE+8thixRitZx8XBpQJZSHTOHDA-F4tQ7kR- > uANHghGdRHhUCQ at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > On 30 January 2015 at 02:38, Timothy B. Terriberry &...

...e4 > (Timothy B. Terriberry) > 6. Re: Bug fix and compatibility patches for 1.3.0pre4 > (Janne Hyv?rinen) > 7. Re: (no subject) (Ralph Giles) > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterribe at xiph.org > <mailto:tterribe at xiph.org>> > To: flac-dev at xiph.org <mailto:flac-dev at xiph.org> > Cc: > Date: Sun, 05 May 2013 14:43:46 -0700 > Subject: Re: [flac-dev] Bug fix and compatibility patches for > 1.3.0pre4 > Janne Hy...

...lity patches for 1.3.0pre4 > (Timothy B. Terriberry) > 6. Re: Bug fix and compatibility patches for 1.3.0pre4 > (Janne Hyv?rinen) > 7. Re: (no subject) (Ralph Giles) > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterribe at xiph.org> > To: flac-dev at xiph.org > Cc: > Date: Sun, 05 May 2013 14:43:46 -0700 > Subject: Re: [flac-dev] Bug fix and compatibility patches for 1.3.0pre4 > Janne Hyv?rinen wrote: > >> You people do realize these hacks would only be required for 10+ year >> ol...

On 29 April 2015 at 17:22, Timothy B. Terriberry <tterribe at xiph.org> wrote: > > Viswanath Puttagunta wrote: >> >> This patch series is follow up on work I posted on [1]. >> In addition to what was posted on [1], this patch series mainly >> integrates Fixed point FFT implementations in NE10 library into opus. >> Yo...