Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "try_hard".
Did you mean:
tryhard
2013 Jul 15
1
Packet loss with LocalDiscovery
Hi,
I believe I have found a bug with regard to the LocalDiscovery feature.
This is on tinc-1.1pre7 between two Windows nodes.
Steps to reproduce:
- Get two nodes talking using LocalDiscovery (e.g. put them on the same
LAN behind a NAT with no metaconnection to each other)
- Make one ping the other.
Expected result:
- The two nodes should ping each other without any packet loss,
hopefully at
2015 Dec 02
5
[PATCH] Receive multiple packets at a time
...mcmp(DSTID(&pkt[i]), &nullid, sizeof nullid) && from->status.sptps) {
+ if(sptps_verify_datagram(&from->sptps, DATA(&pkt[i]), pkt[i].len - 2 * sizeof(node_id_t)))
+ n = from;
+ else
+ goto skip_harder;
+ }
}
- }
- if(!n) {
- pkt.offset = 0;
- n = try_harder(&addr, &pkt);
- }
+ if(!n) {
+ pkt[i].offset = 0;
+ n = try_harder(&addr[i], &pkt[i]);
+ }
-skip_harder:
- if(!n) {
- if(debug_level >= DEBUG_PROTOCOL) {
- hostname = sockaddr2hostname(&addr);
- logger(DEBUG_PROTOCOL, LOG_WARNING, "Received UDP packet from...
2015 Dec 10
2
[PATCH] Receive multiple packets at a time
...ecvmmsg select strdup strerror strsignal strtol system unsetenv usleep vsyslog writev],
[], [], [#include "src/have.h"]
)
diff --git a/src/net_packet.c b/src/net_packet.c
index e67857c..174db34 100644
--- a/src/net_packet.c
+++ b/src/net_packet.c
@@ -695,31 +695,26 @@ static node_t *try_harder(const sockaddr_t *from, const vpn_packet_t *pkt) {
return n;
}
-void handle_incoming_vpn_data(int sock) {
- vpn_packet_t pkt;
+#ifdef HAVE_RECVMMSG
+#define MAX_MSG 256
+#else
+#define MAX_MSG 1
+#endif
+
+static void handle_incoming_vpn_packet(int sock, vpn_packet_t *pkt, sockaddr_t *from...
2015 Dec 02
0
[PATCH] Receive multiple packets at a time
...n = from;
> + else
> + goto skip_harder;
> + }
> }
> - }
>
> - if(!n) {
> - pkt.offset = 0;
> - n = try_harder(&addr, &pkt);
> - }
> + if(!n) {
> + pkt[i].offset = 0;
> + n = try_harder(&addr[i], &pkt[i]);
> + }
>
> -skip_harder:
> - if(!n) {
> - if(debug_level >=...
2011 Jan 03
1
Tinc improvements
...PTION_TCPONLY)
@@ -475,6 +481,10 @@
inpkt->len += n->outmaclength;
}
+ /* Add flags (not encrypted) */
+
+ inpkt->len += sizeof(inpkt->flags);
+
/* Determine which socket we have to use */
for(sock = 0; sock < listen_sockets; sock++)
@@ -574,29 +584,28 @@
static node_t *try_harder(const sockaddr_t *from, const vpn_packet_t *pkt) {
avl_node_t *node;
edge_t *e;
- node_t *n = NULL;
static time_t last_hard_try = 0;
- for(node = edge_weight_tree->head; node; node = node->next) {
+ for (node = edge_weight_tree->head; node; node = node->next) {
e = node->...
2014 Jul 16
2
Some questions about SPTPS
I've been using SPTPS (a.k.a ExperimentalProtocol) for a while now, but
I've only recently started looking into the details of the protocol
itself. I have some questions about the design:
- I am not sure what the thread model for SPTPS is when compared with
the legacy protocol. SPTPS is vastly more complex than the legacy
protocol (it adds a whole new handshake mechanism), and
2010 Nov 22
7
local address announcements
Hi everyone,
you can find the current version of my enhanced tinc using subversion:
svn://tardyon.mon-clan.de/tinc
I allowed anonymous read access, so feel free to download the sources.
Unfortunately, my enhancements are based on a rather old git-checkout from
Guus.
The version should run under windows and Debian/Ubuntu.
Best,
Daniel
-----Original Message-----
From: folkert [mailto:folkert