Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "try_calls_basic".
Did you mean:
try_calls_basic2
2009 May 19
1
[LLVMdev] how to get a deterministic execution
...e instructions were generated
seems it is not (although the result is guaranteed to be the same).
Now I think the order functions are processed might not be guaranteed.
I've attached a test case, and here is what I get:
...............................
(303)$ ~/bin/llvm/bin/gcc -O3 -emit-llvm try_calls_basic.2.c -c -o try_calls_basic2.bc
(304)$ $LLVM/opt -O3 -IR-DUMP :ALL -load ~/download/llvm-objects/Debug/lib/LLVMHello.so -hello -debug-pass Structure < try_calls_basic2.bc > try_calls_basic2.2.bc 2> x1
(305)$ $LLVM/opt -O3 -IR-DUMP :ALL -load ~/download/llvm-objects/Debug/lib/LLVMHello...
2009 May 19
0
[LLVMdev] how to get a deterministic execution
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 8:33 PM, dan mihai <dnmh68 at hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
Yo!
> For debugging purposes, I've added a unique id member to the Value class:
>
> global_next_vuid = 0;
> Value::Value(..){
> vuid = ++global_next_vuid;
> }
>
> My hope is that by looking at the vuid of a Value, I can see its vuid,
> set a conditional breakpoint and
2009 May 19
2
[LLVMdev] how to get a deterministic execution
Hello,
For debugging purposes, I've added a unique id member to the Value class:
global_next_vuid = 0;
Value::Value(..){
vuid = ++global_next_vuid;
}
My hope is that by looking at the vuid of a Value, I can see its vuid,
set a conditional breakpoint and re-run the compiler to
see who (what pass) constructed that value.
Maybe I am not doing it the right way, but the above 'vuid'