search for: trusting

On 07/20/2017 02:20 PM, yayo (j) wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you for the answer and sorry for delay: > > 2017-07-19 16:55 GMT+02:00 Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com > <mailto:ravishankar at redhat.com>>: > > 1. What does the glustershd.log say on all 3 nodes when you run > the command? Does it complain anything about these files? > > >

2017-07-20 11:34 GMT+02:00 Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com>: > > Could you check if the self-heal daemon on all nodes is connected to the 3 > bricks? You will need to check the glustershd.log for that. > If it is not connected, try restarting the shd using `gluster volume start > engine force`, then launch the heal command like you did earlier and see if > heals

Hi, Thank you for the answer and sorry for delay: 2017-07-19 16:55 GMT+02:00 Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com>: 1. What does the glustershd.log say on all 3 nodes when you run the > command? Does it complain anything about these files? > No, glustershd.log is clean, no extra log after command on all 3 nodes > 2. Are these 12 files also present in the 3rd data brick?

On 07/20/2017 03:42 PM, yayo (j) wrote: > > 2017-07-20 11:34 GMT+02:00 Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com > <mailto:ravishankar at redhat.com>>: > > > Could you check if the self-heal daemon on all nodes is connected > to the 3 bricks? You will need to check the glustershd.log for that. > If it is not connected, try restarting the shd using

Hi Junaid, Sorry about the confusion, indeed I gave you the wrong output. So let's start to the beginning. I disabled quota and I reactivated it My configuration : Volume Name: venus Type: Distributed-Replicate Status: Started Number of Bricks: 2 x 2 = 4 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: ylal3020:/soft/venus Brick2: ylal3030:/soft/venus Brick3: yval1000:/soft/venus Brick4:

Hello, I am using SAMBA 4.1.6 AD on Ubuntu 14.04.02, I am trying to use the Active Directory Domains and Trust tool but it keeps giving me this message. I am trying to fix this issue: The requested operation cannot be completed. The computer must be trusted for delegation and the current user account must be configured to allow delegation. (SQLEditors) Would you please help how I can solve

Currently I have the following empirical knowledge about outgoing trust: - In case of creating this type of trust using direction=both we get outgoing trust working partially - it is possible to login to Windows member of trusting domain with trusted credentials as well as access shares on trusted side further. It is impossible to make the same login on Linux members. - In case of making the same trust on both sides separately it is impossible to login to both Windows and Linux clients. So outgoing trust doesn't work in...

resending mail. On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Amudhan P <amudhan83 at gmail.com> wrote: > ok, from bitrot code I figured out gluster using sha256 hashing algo. > > > Now coming to the problem, during scrub run in my cluster some of my files > were marked as bad in few set of nodes. > I just wanted to confirm bad file. so, I have used "sha256sum" tool in >

ok, from bitrot code I figured out gluster using sha256 hashing algo. Now coming to the problem, during scrub run in my cluster some of my files were marked as bad in few set of nodes. I just wanted to confirm bad file. so, I have used "sha256sum" tool in Linux to manually get file hash. here is the result. file-1, file-2 marked as bad by scrub and file-3 is healthy. file-1 sha256

Hi, I have a file in my brick which was signed by bitrot and latter when running scrub it was marked as bad. Now, I want to verify file again manually. just to clarify my doubt how can I do this? regards Amudhan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170921/f69ff7be/attachment.html>

...uot; and > "DCs of domain A can grant domain admin rights in domain B" What we would like to achieve is a one-way incoming trust with a (large) external native windows AD domain, to make their users able to access our (samba) domain member fileservers. So, samba would be the "trusting (resource) domain", and the large native windows AD domain would be the "trusted (account) domain". We don't need access to the trusted domain groups and other info, and we would not like remote "domain admins" to be become domain admins in our samba domain. Is the...

Hi all, I was hoping to setup a realm trust between a Samba AD domain and a kerberos realm running mit-krb5, however it looks like that isn't currently supported. Is that correct, or am I missing something (I'm running Samba 4.9.4)? Having noticed that "samba-tool domain trust" only seems to cater for trusts involving other AD domains, I tried to workaround that (in the

Just a thought if the client machines are still getting a listing in the DNS for the failed machines wouldn't this be a problem? How would the programs know not to use the failed server? Is there a way to temporarily move the failed machines out of dns listings? On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Vinicius Bones Silva via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > No, the question is

my volume is distributed disperse volume 8+2 EC. file1 and file2 are different files lying in same brick. I am able to read the file from mount point without any issue because of EC it reads rest of the available blocks in other nodes. my question is "file1" sha256 value matches bitrot signature value but still, it is also marked as bad by scrubber daemon. why is that? On Fri, Sep

hi all, thanks to Rowland advice, I checked the net trustdom way to establish trust between domains. In my setup I have a samba-4.7.4 NT4 domain named TRUSTING which needs to have a trusting (outgoing)[1] with samba-4.7.4 AD domain named ATENEOAD. As far as I know it is very similar to: https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/InterdomainTrusts.html#id2620849 I added the lmhosts entries on both servers for the peer. `net lookup` works...

...urity settings of the shares, and everyone sees everything they're supposed to on the Windows side. However, I can't get the Samba domain to trust the Windows domain the other way. I've attempted to add the Samba domain using the same W2K tools, but getting the trust to work (Samba trusting Windows) just gives me a bunch of mysterious errors. I have two questions: is winbindd/pam a requirement for proper trust establishment, and has anyone had success establishing W2K trusts? Thanks.

In article <201908300952.37126.gary.stainburn at ringways.co.uk>, Gary Stainburn <gary.stainburn at ringways.co.uk> wrote: > On Thursday 29 August 2019 18:10:19 Alexander Dalloz wrote: > > > 2019-08-29 17:23:18,117 exception: [Errno 14] curl#60 - "Peer's > > > Certificate issuer is not recognized." > > > 2019-08-29 17:23:18,117 retrycode (14)

Now I have a some time to answer, maybe a few of your questions. Am 26.02.19 um 20:59 schrieb lists via samba: > Hi, > > No replies unfortunately. Unsure why. There are still a lot of questions open and I think a lot of things have to be done. > > We searched the list, and we found little discussion on the subject of > trusts. We see occasional questions, but they are often

Hello, I am currently testing for Samba4. The creation of the domain and the secondary Dc implementation works well. But by performing tests for a fail over situation I realized that when the DC that created the domain is in fail over the linux client machine can no longer retrieve the list of users from the domain. I would like to know if a person has already faced this situation and if so how he

Thank you Ravi for your fast answer. As requested you will find below the "stat" and "getfattr" of one of the files and its parent directory from all three nodes of my cluster. NODE 1: File: ?/data/myvolume-private/brick/dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4/dir5/dir6/dir7/dir8/dir9/dir10/OC_DEFAULT_MODULE/filename.shareKey? Size: 0 Blocks: 38 IO Block: 131072 regular