search for: trusted

On 07/20/2017 02:20 PM, yayo (j) wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you for the answer and sorry for delay: > > 2017-07-19 16:55 GMT+02:00 Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com > <mailto:ravishankar at redhat.com>>: > > 1. What does the glustershd.log say on all 3 nodes when you run > the command? Does it complain anything about these files? > > >

...he getfattr outputs of the 12 files from > all 3 nodes using `getfattr -d -m . -e hex */gluster/engine/brick/* > path-to-file` ? > > *NODE01:* *getfattr: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names* *# file: gluster/engine/brick/.shard/8aa74564-6740-403e-ad51-f56d9ca5d7a7.68* *trusted.afr.dirty=0x000000000000000000000000* *trusted.afr.engine-client-1=0x000000000000000000000000* *trusted.afr.engine-client-2=0x000000120000000000000000* *trusted.bit-rot.version=0x090000000000000059647d5b000447e9* *trusted.gfid=0xe3565b5014954e5bae883bceca47b7d9* *getfattr: Removing leading '/&...

Hi, Thank you for the answer and sorry for delay: 2017-07-19 16:55 GMT+02:00 Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com>: 1. What does the glustershd.log say on all 3 nodes when you run the > command? Does it complain anything about these files? > No, glustershd.log is clean, no extra log after command on all 3 nodes > 2. Are these 12 files also present in the 3rd data brick?

...3 nodes using `getfattr -d -m . -e hex > //gluster/engine/brick//path-to-file` ? > > > */NODE01:/* > /getfattr: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names/ > /# file: > gluster/engine/brick/.shard/8aa74564-6740-403e-ad51-f56d9ca5d7a7.68/ > /trusted.afr.dirty=0x000000000000000000000000/ > /trusted.afr.engine-client-1=0x000000000000000000000000/ > /trusted.afr.engine-client-2=0x000000120000000000000000/ > /trusted.bit-rot.version=0x090000000000000059647d5b000447e9/ > /trusted.gfid=0xe3565b5014954e5bae883bceca47b7d9/...

...<= NO OK /test 100MB 4.0MB <= OK / 7GB 5.2GB <= NO OK Is seems this is 4 time the original size for / and /soft Getfattr for the four nodes : ylal3020:/etc/ucarp/interface # getfattr -n trusted.glusterfs.quota.size -e hex /soft/venus ; getfattr -n trusted.glusterfs.quota.size -e hex /soft/venus/test ; getfattr -n trusted.glusterfs.quota.size -e hex /soft/venus/psa;getfattr -n trusted.glusterfs.quota.size -e hex /soft/venus/soft getfattr: Removing leading '/' from absolute path nam...

Hello, I am using SAMBA 4.1.6 AD on Ubuntu 14.04.02, I am trying to use the Active Directory Domains and Trust tool but it keeps giving me this message. I am trying to fix this issue: The requested operation cannot be completed. The computer must be trusted for delegation and the current user account must be configured to allow delegation. (SQLEditors) Would you please help how I can solve this issue? Br. Umar

Currently I have the following empirical knowledge about outgoing trust: - In case of creating this type of trust using direction=both we get outgoing trust working partially - it is possible to login to Windows member of trusting domain with trusted credentials as well as access shares on trusted side further. It is impossible to make the same login on Linux members. - In case of making the same trust on both sides separately it is impossible to login to both Windows and Linux clients. So outgoing trust doesn't work in this case. Two-ways...

...drive. > > file-3 sha256 and bitrot signature matches and healthy. > > > file-1 output from > > "sha256sum" = "71eada9352b1352aaef0f806d3d561 > 768ce2df905ded1668f665e06eca2d0bd4" > > > "getfattr -m. -e hex -d " > # file: file-1 > trusted.bit-rot.bad-file=0x3100 > trusted.bit-rot.signature=0x01020000000000000071eada9352 > b1352aaef0f806d3d561768ce2df905ded1668f665e06eca2d0bd4 > trusted.bit-rot.version=0x020000000000000058e4f3b40006793d > trusted.ec.config=0x0000080a02000200 > trusted.ec.dirty=0x00000000000000000000000...

...still readable without any issue and no errors found in the drive. file-3 sha256 and bitrot signature matches and healthy. file-1 output from "sha256sum" = "71eada9352b1352aaef0f806d3d561768ce2df905ded1668f665e06eca2d0bd4" "getfattr -m. -e hex -d " # file: file-1 trusted.bit-rot.bad-file=0x3100 trusted.bit-rot.signature=0x01020000000000000071eada9352b1352aaef0f806d3d561768ce2df905ded1668f665e06eca2d0bd4 trusted.bit-rot.version=0x020000000000000058e4f3b40006793d trusted.ec.config=0x0000080a02000200 trusted.ec.dirty=0x00000000000000000000000000000000 trusted.ec.size=...

Hi, I have a file in my brick which was signed by bitrot and latter when running scrub it was marked as bad. Now, I want to verify file again manually. just to clarify my doubt how can I do this? regards Amudhan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20170921/f69ff7be/attachment.html>

Hi, Having read the release notes on the status of trusts within samba, we see for 4.9 > "improved support for trusted domains" but we also always see these messages: > "Both sides of the trust need to fully trust each other!" and > "DCs of domain A can grant domain admin rights in domain B" What we would like to achieve is a one-way incoming trust with a (large) external native...

...amba-tool domain trust list/show" do present sensible information: # samba-tool domain trust list Type[External] Transitive[No]  Direction[OUTGOING] Name[KRB.REALM] # samba-tool domain trust show KRB.REALM LocalDomain Netbios[AD] DNS[ad.domain] SID[S-1-5-21-611510720-3146064378-2947260547] TrustedDomain: NetbiosName:    KRB.REALM SID:            None Type:           0x3 (MIT) Direction:      0x2 (OUTBOUND) Attributes:     0x1 (NON_TRANSITIVE) PosixOffset:    0x00000000 (0) kerb_EncTypes:  0x18 (AES128_CTS_HMAC_SHA1_96,AES256_CTS_HMAC_SHA1_96) However I have already noticed one thing that i...

Just a thought if the client machines are still getting a listing in the DNS for the failed machines wouldn't this be a problem? How would the programs know not to use the failed server? Is there a way to temporarily move the failed machines out of dns listings? On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Vinicius Bones Silva via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > No, the question is

...t;>> >>> file-1 output from >>> >>> "sha256sum" = "71eada9352b1352aaef0f806d3d56 >>> 1768ce2df905ded1668f665e06eca2d0bd4" >>> >>> >>> "getfattr -m. -e hex -d " >>> # file: file-1 >>> trusted.bit-rot.bad-file=0x3100 >>> trusted.bit-rot.signature=0x01020000000000000071eada9352b135 >>> 2aaef0f806d3d561768ce2df905ded1668f665e06eca2d0bd4 >>> trusted.bit-rot.version=0x020000000000000058e4f3b40006793d >>> trusted.ec.config=0x0000080a02000200 >>> tr...

...d TRUSTING work. Error is: Failed to modify record CN=TRUSTING$,CN=Users,DC=ad,DC=EXAMPLE,DC=org: Failed to modify CN=TRUSTING$,CN=Users,DC=ad,DC=EXAMPLE,DC=org: Updating the UF_INTERDOMAIN_TRUST_ACCOUNT bit in userAccountControl is not permitted over LDAP. This bit is restricted to the LSA CreateTrustedDomain interface On the other hand, the following works: /opt/samba$ sudo ./bin/net rpc trust create otherdomainsid=S-1-5-21-3818863361-4285555769-2448187145 other_netbios_domain=TRUSTING otherdomain=TRUSTING trustpw=aPassword (as Rowland said). Was there a better way to do it? Now on TRUSTING PD...

Setup: Samba3beta3 domain (NEWDOM) with a single PDC. No winbind activated. Uses smbpasswd for user authentication. Windows 2K AD (OLDDOM) domain with two DCs. I've been struggling to get a trust established one way with these two domains. Since I have a native W2K AD domain, I have to use AD domain tools to establish the trusts. I followed the documentation regarding creating a

In article <201908300952.37126.gary.stainburn at ringways.co.uk>, Gary Stainburn <gary.stainburn at ringways.co.uk> wrote: > On Thursday 29 August 2019 18:10:19 Alexander Dalloz wrote: > > > 2019-08-29 17:23:18,117 exception: [Errno 14] curl#60 - "Peer's > > > Certificate issuer is not recognized." > > > 2019-08-29 17:23:18,117 retrycode (14)

...Type[External] Transitive[No]  Direction[BOTH]     >> Name[testad1.company.com] > >> root at testad2dc:/var/log/samba# samba-tool domain trust show testad1 >> LocalDomain Netbios[TESTAD2] DNS[testad2.company.com] >> SID[S-1-5-21-1012147493-3366197983-1829854343] >> TrustedDomain: > >> NetbiosName:    TESTAD1 >> DnsName:        testad1.company.com >> SID:            S-1-5-21-2509583006-2398556320-3264531554 >> Type:           0x2 (UPLEVEL) >> Direction:      0x3 (BOTH) >> Attributes:     0x4 (QUARANTINED_DOMAIN) >> PosixOf...

Hello, I am currently testing for Samba4. The creation of the domain and the secondary Dc implementation works well. But by performing tests for a fail over situation I realized that when the DC that created the domain is in fail over the linux client machine can no longer retrieve the list of users from the domain. I would like to know if a person has already faced this situation and if so how he

...UNKNOWN) Gid: (20936/ UNKNOWN) Access: 2018-04-25 09:41:24.276780766 +0200 Modify: 2018-05-15 08:54:20.392048056 +0200 Change: 2018-05-15 08:54:20.392048056 +0200 Birth: - # file: data/myvolume-private/brick/dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4/dir5/dir6/dir7/dir8/dir9/dir10/OC_DEFAULT_MODULE/filename.shareKey trusted.gfid=0x3b6c722cd6c64a4180fa028809671d63 trusted.gfid2path.9cb852a48fe5e361=0x38666131356462642d636435632d343930302d623838392d3066653766636534366131332f6e6361646d696e6973747261746f722e73686172654b6579 trusted.glusterfs.quota.8fa15dbd-cd5c-4900-b889-0fe7fce46a13.contri.1=0x000000000000000000000000000...