search for: trus

OK - my last main bug was fixed a few releases ago. I know that there's no end to getting things right but there comes a point when you need to call it done. No one trusts a 1.0 to be perfect but Dovecot is already better that most 2.0 versions of other software. I vote (as if my vote counted) to call it done, declare victory, and move on to 1.01, 1.02 etc. No one is going to trus it till it gets to 1.02 so I say lets bless it and move on.

Hi All, I am trying to install extlinux on a fresh system. Here are my steps : ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ A) Create an ext2 partition. I did the following steps : 1) boot from CD 2) Activate GParted 3) Create Partition table on the "fresh disk" (/dev/sda). 4) Create 1 ext2 partition (and mark its flag as "boot"). B)mkdir /mnt/Ext2_partition C) mount /dev/sda1

...ar All i have Knoppix Os on my laptop , i want to use Softwere Babylone dictionary, Ms vision and MSOutlook, but when i want to install it for exemple Babylone he dependency Internet explorer and when i try to install ie6 he show me the erro connection. its immasing because i have internet, its trus i connect to Internet Trough proxy , but when i chnage my setting network for direct connect, i have the same error please can you help me step by step how i can to install many softwere for exemple Babylone or MSVisio. Best Regard sorry For my bad English

....org/ It is philosophically aligned with the open source software world, rather than act as bait for a company that would prefer to sell you a cert instead. I?m only aware of one case where you absolutely cannot use Let?s Encrypt, but it also affects the other public CAs: you can?t get a publicly-trusted cert for a machine without a publicly-recognized and -visible domain name. For that, you still need to use self-signed certs or certs signed by a private CA.

...2:40241 for DNS/a.root-servers.net at HH3.SITE [canonicalize, renewable] Kerberos: Searching referral for a.root-servers.net Kerberos: Returning a referral to realm ROOT-SERVERS.NET for server DNS/a.root-servers.net at HH3.SITE that was not found Failed find a single entry for (&(objectClass=trustedDomain)(|(flatname=ROOT-SERVERS.NET)(trustPartner=ROOT-SERVERS.NET))): got 0 Kerberos: samba_kdc_fetch: could not find principal in DB Kerberos: Server not found in database: krbtgt/ROOT-SERVERS.NET at HH3.SITE: no such entry found in hdb Kerberos: Failed building TGS-REP to ipv4:192.168.1.22:4...

Hi, hm i don?t think that it has something to do with the trus-relationship if it where so than every user on that pc would get a permision denied. what does the error message exactly says? example: Access denied, the network path was not found... -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- Von: Bert_De_Ridder@peopleware.be [mailto:Bert_De_Ridder@peopleware.be]...

...N PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Gavin Henry wrote: > <quote who="Marc Perkel"> >> OK - my last main bug was fixed a few releases ago. I know that there's >> no end to getting things right but there comes a point when you need to >> call it done. No one trusts a 1.0 to be perfect but Dovecot is already >> better that most 2.0 versions of other software. >> >> I vote (as if my vote counted) to call it done, declare victory, and >> move on to 1.01, 1.02 etc. No one is going to trus it till it gets to >> 1.02 so I say lets bl...

...and mark its flag as "boot"). Did you use mkfs.ext2 to create the filesystem or let GParted create it? Which version of GParted? Which version of libparted? There were some bugs regarding quite recent versions of GParted resulting in filesystems larger than the partition. And I do not trus "mkfs ext2" within parted as well. > B)mkdir /mnt/Ext2_partition > C) mount /dev/sda1 /mnt/Ext2_partition I experienced some bad behaviour up to unclean filesystems using the ext2 and ext3 drivers in kernels from 3.2 upwards. You might want to mount explicitly using the ext4 dr...

...otherwise server certificate signed by one of these authorities is on the same page with my private Certification Authority (which I used to run for over 10 years, then in my kickstart I had my CA certificate imported into CA of clients - but other clients, like laptops had to download, install and trus my CA certificate). Of course, this is a notch better than "self-signed" server certificates, as you only need to import CA certificate once, whereas you will need to import self-signed server certificates for each of the servers... Am I missing something? Also: with CA signing server c...

...2:40241 for DNS/a.root-servers.net at HH3.SITE [canonicalize, renewable] Kerberos: Searching referral for a.root-servers.net Kerberos: Returning a referral to realm ROOT-SERVERS.NET for server DNS/a.root-servers.net at HH3.SITE that was not found Failed find a single entry for (&(objectClass=trustedDomain)(|(flatname=ROOT-SERVERS.NET)(trustPartner=ROOT-SERVERS.NET))): got 0 Kerberos: samba_kdc_fetch: could not find principal in DB Kerberos: Server not found in database: krbtgt/ROOT-SERVERS.NET at HH3.SITE: no such entry found in hdb Kerberos: Failed building TGS-REP to ipv4:192.168.1.22:4...

...t"). >> > > Did you use mkfs.ext2 to create the filesystem or let GParted create it? > Which version of GParted? Which version of libparted? There were some bugs > regarding quite recent versions of GParted resulting in filesystems larger > than the partition. And I do not trus "mkfs ext2" within parted as well. > > > B)mkdir /mnt/Ext2_partition >> C) mount /dev/sda1 /mnt/Ext2_partition >> > > I experienced some bad behaviour up to unclean filesystems using the ext2 > and ext3 drivers in kernels from 3.2 upwards. You might want to...

...e WoSign there (though I'd prefer to avoid my US located servers > have certificates signed by authority located in China, hence located sort > of behind "the great firewall of China" - call me superstitious). That?s a perfectly valid concern. The last I heard, modern browsers trust 1,100 CAs! Surely some of those CAs have interests that do not align with my interests. > I do not see neither starttls.com nor letsencrypt.org between Authorities > certificates. That?s because they are not top-tier CAs. > This means (correct me if I'm wrong) that client has to &...

...gt; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > hm i don?t think that it has something to do with the > > > > trus-relationship if > > > > > it where so than every user on that pc would get a permision > > denied. > > > > > what does the error message exactly says? > > > > > example: > > > > > Access denied, the network path was not found...