Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "truec".
Did you mean:
true
2012 Oct 10
2
[LLVMdev] Solicit code review (change to CodeGen)
...xin
-------------- next part --------------
Index: lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp
===================================================================
--- lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp (revision 165638)
+++ lib/Target/X86/X86ISelLowering.cpp (working copy)
@@ -14418,6 +14418,7 @@
if (TrueC->getAPIntValue().ult(FalseC->getAPIntValue())) {
CC = X86::GetOppositeBranchCondition(CC);
std::swap(TrueC, FalseC);
+ std::swap(TrueOp, FalseOp);
}
// Optimize C ? 8 : 0 -> zext(setcc(C)) << 3. Likewise for any pow2/0.
@@ -14500,6 +14501,45...
2024 Sep 23
0
bit, bit64, ff and greeNsort
Dear package maintainers,
Dear users of packages `bit`, `bit64`, `ff`,
Everyone interested in sustainable sorting algorithms,
I submitted updated versions for the upcoming R 4.5.0. The are only
minor changes (see the NEWS files) but there is one important change in
bit64:
??? o setting options(integer64_semantics="new")
????? gives the better semantics suggested by Ofek Shilon.
2024 Sep 23
0
bit, bit64, ff and greeNsort
Dear package maintainers,
Dear users of packages `bit`, `bit64`, `ff`,
Everyone interested in sustainable sorting algorithms,
I submitted updated versions for the upcoming R 4.5.0. The are only
minor changes (see the NEWS files) but there is one important change in
bit64:
??? o setting options(integer64_semantics="new")
????? gives the better semantics suggested by Ofek Shilon.