search for: trivialrewriter

R.I.P. SimpleRewriter. If anyone needs it resurrected let me know. This leaves LocalRewriter (the default) and the new TrivialRewriter, which is for use only with the new in-place spilling framework. This framework appears (if you squint just right) to be basically functional now, but it produces awful code. If you want to play with it you can invoke it with the magical combination of "-join-liveintervals=false -new-spill-fra...

On Thursday 04 June 2009 13:57, Lang Hames wrote: > R.I.P. SimpleRewriter. If anyone needs it resurrected let me know. > > This leaves LocalRewriter (the default) and the new TrivialRewriter, > which is for use only with the new in-place spilling framework. This > framework appears (if you squint just right) to be basically > functional now, but it produces awful code. If you want to play with > it you can invoke it with the magical combination of > "-join-liveinter...

On Jun 3, 2009, at 5:51 PM, Evan Cheng wrote: > I vote for execution of SimpleRewriter. Yeah, go ahead and axe it: Off with its head! -Chris > > > Evan > > On Jun 3, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Lang Hames wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Is anyone still using SimpleRewriter (formerly known as >> SimpleSpiller)? A quick check with the test suite suggests that it's

...ages though. - Lang. On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 1:46 PM, David Greene <dag at cray.com> wrote: > On Thursday 04 June 2009 13:57, Lang Hames wrote: >> R.I.P. SimpleRewriter. If anyone needs it resurrected let me know. >> >> This leaves LocalRewriter (the default) and the new TrivialRewriter, >> which is for use only with the new in-place spilling framework. This >> framework appears (if you squint just right) to be basically >> functional now, but it produces awful code. If you want to play with >> it you can invoke it with the magical combination of >> &...