Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "tripletest".
2016 Jan 08
2
Diff to add ARMv6L to Target parser
...quot;v6j", "v6")
+ .Case("v6l", "v6")
.Case("v6hl", "v6k")
.Cases("v6m", "v6sm", "v6s-m", "v6-m")
.Cases("v6z", "v6zk", "v6kz")
Index: unittests/ADT/TripleTest.cpp
===================================================================
--- unittests/ADT/TripleTest.cpp (revision 257090)
+++ unittests/ADT/TripleTest.cpp (working copy)
@@ -851,6 +851,10 @@
EXPECT_EQ("arm1136jf-s", Triple.getARMCPUForArch());
}
{
+ llvm::Triple Triple(&quo...
2014 Jun 19
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] triples for baremetal
...S() && isMClass()) ||
(TargetTriple.isOSBinFormatMachO() &&
- TargetTriple.getOS() == Triple::UnknownOS))
+ TargetTriple.getOS() == Triple::NoneOS))
TargetABI = ARM_ABI_AAPCS;
else
TargetABI = ARM_ABI_APCS;
Index: unittests/ADT/TripleTest.cpp
===================================================================
--- unittests/ADT/TripleTest.cpp (revision 211122)
+++ unittests/ADT/TripleTest.cpp (working copy)
@@ -123,12 +123,6 @@
EXPECT_EQ(Triple::UnknownOS, T.getOS());
EXPECT_EQ(Triple::UnknownEnvironment, T.getEnvironment());...
2014 Jun 17
4
[LLVMdev] triples for baremetal
[+llvmdev, -llvm-dev]
(Oopsies, llvmdev doesn't have a hyphen in it like all the others do)
On 6/17/14, 10:45 AM, Jonathan Roelofs wrote:
> [+llvm-dev, cfe-dev]
>
> Was "Re: [PATCH] ARM: allow inline atomics on Cortex M"
>
> On 6/17/14, 10:42 AM, Jonathan Roelofs wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6/17/14, 9:35 AM, Renato Golin wrote:
>>> On 17 June 2014
2016 Jan 05
6
Diff to add ARMv6L to Target parser
> You assume triples make sense. That's the first mistake everyone does
> when thinking about triples. :)
I know they don't make sense in many corner cases, but I think
discarding logic where it *does* exist is a mistake.
> AFAIK, "ARMv7B" is only used by HighBank, which is no more. But that,
> too, was "ARMv7A big endian".
I believe it's what any
2012 Oct 24
0
[LLVMdev] Error building llvm on AIX 7.1
AIX 7.1 & Power5
I have downloaded the llvm source and ran the following steps:
1. ./configure --enable-targets=powerpc
2. gmake
Apart from it, i had to make a few changes.
i. dladdr code has been commented for the time being and using the default
constructor code for that method
ii. In Makefile.config, 2 changes were done.
+153 # Linker flags.
+154 LDFLAGS+=-Wl,-G,-bexpfull
+211
2012 Oct 24
2
[LLVMdev] Error building llvm on AIX 7.1
...Release+Asserts build
llvm[2]: Compiling SparseBitVectorTest.cpp for Release+Asserts build
llvm[2]: Compiling SparseSetTest.cpp for Release+Asserts build
llvm[2]: Compiling StringMapTest.cpp for Release+Asserts build
llvm[2]: Compiling StringRefTest.cpp for Release+Asserts build
llvm[2]: Compiling TripleTest.cpp for Release+Asserts build
llvm[2]: Compiling TwineTest.cpp for Release+Asserts build
llvm[2]: Compiling VariadicFunctionTest.cpp for Release+Asserts build
llvm[2]: Compiling ilistTest.cpp for Release+Asserts build
gmake[2]: *** No rule to make target
`/usr/llvm/llvm-3.1.src/unittests/lib/libLLV...
2012 Oct 23
2
[LLVMdev] Error building llvm on AIX 7.1
On 10/23/2012 12:20 PM, Sunil Saggar wrote:
> I was able to process further by making some code changes and replacing
> export-dynamic with -bexpfull in Makefile.config. Now, i am getting
> following error while linking ..
>
> llvm[3]: Linking Release+Asserts Loadable Module LLVMHello.so
What exactly was the linking command?
-Krzysztof
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
2016 Jan 04
4
Diff to add ARMv6L to Target parser
>> Going back through SVN history, I cannot find any evidence that ARMv6L ever existed.
>
> Oh, my bad!! I was thinking of ARMv7l... :/
>
> Nevertheless, I'll leave you guys to review this one, as I lost touch with the parser a while ago.
Ah, I see: ARMv7L is now an alias for ARMv7A.
So, if William has to add support for ARMv6L, I'd suggest he adds it as an alias, and
2015 Sep 18
4
Heads up: Bug in CMake found when attempting 64-bit build with 32-bit clang-cl.
Hi Nico, Hans, Takumi,
I made it to the bottom of the issue. Turns out that
CMAKE_C_FLAGS=-m64
CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS=-m64
CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS=/machine:x64
is enough to do a 64-bit build correctly with a 32-bit clang-cl (i.e. one
that targets 32-bit by default). Hooray! The missing piece that I had to
track down is why I would see `deps = msvc` stuff spewing onto my terminal,
rather than consumed
2015 Jul 29
1
[LLVMdev] Error when i am using command make -j4 command in cygwin to compile safecode
...cpp for Release+Asserts build
llvm[2]: Compiling TinyPtrVectorTest.cpp for Release+Asserts build
llvm[3]: Compiling Local.cpp for Release+Asserts build
llvm[2]: Linking Release+Asserts unit test IR (without symbols)
llvm[3]: Compiling ValueMapperTest.cpp for Release+Asserts build
llvm[2]: Compiling TripleTest.cpp for Release+Asserts build
llvm[2]: Compiling DataExtractorTest.cpp for Release+Asserts build
llvm[3]: Linking Release+Asserts unit test Utils (without symbols)
llvm[2]: Compiling DwarfTest.cpp for Release+Asserts build
llvm[2]: ======= Finished Linking Release+Asserts Unit test IR (without symb...