search for: trinying

Displaying 19 results from an estimated 19 matches for "trinying".

Did you mean: trining
2001 Sep 24
1
ext3-2.4-0.9.10
An ext3 patch against linux 2.4.10 is at http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/ext3/ This patch is *lightly tested* - ie, it boots and does stuff. The changes to ext3 are small, but the kernel which it patches has recently changed a lot. If you're cautious, please wait a couple of days. The patch retains the buffer-tracing code. This will soon be broken out into a separate patch to make
2009 Apr 29
2
reading csv file : blanks
Hi, I have a comma seperated data file which has blanks in it. I am trinying to import it to R using data1<-read.csv("oa_2006.csv", header = TRUE, sep = ",", quote="\"", dec=".") I want the missing values to be "NA". instead R reads them as "U". Any idea why this happens ? Thanks in advance. Regards, Na...
2001 Aug 02
1
Another ext3 crash on PPC
I've attached the .gz'ed log of another EXT3 crash on my PPC box. This time it was on IDE and I was doing a tab completion as it died. -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
2001 Aug 18
0
ext3 for 2.4.9?
Hey all. I was wondering if an official patch vs 2.4.9 is in the works yet. I managed to apply it locally, but there was one or two changes that didn't apply cleanly. (mm/vmscan.c has had some stuffs moved around). I think I did it right, but an official patch is always nice. :) -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
2001 Jul 29
2
e2fsprogs & endian questions
Hey all. I'm not on the list, so can you please cc me? Thanks. Anyhow, I've got two questions. First, the website says that the 'latest' e2fsprogs are needed. Does this mean 1.23-WIP is needed or will 1.22 do? I'm assuming it's just a generally good idea. Second, has anyone tested this on a BE machine? I'd like to use this on my PPC. I don't mind testing
2001 Jul 30
1
ext3-0.9.5-247/2.4.8-pre3/PPC Oops bits
Okay, after playing around a bit more, I'm getting two oopes in a row when running dbench 16 or dbench 32. Decoded, here they are: Assertion failure in unmap_underlying_metadata() at buffer.c:1530: "!buffer_jlist_eq(old_bh, 3)" kernel BUG at buffer.c:1530! Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 4 NIP: C003BB34 XER: 00000000 LR: C003BB34 SP: CF881E00 REGS: cf881d50 TRAP: 0700 Using
2001 Sep 07
4
ext3-2.4-0.9.9
Patches against 2.4.10-pre4 and 2.4.9-ac9 are at http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/ext3/ It's a fairly large change. The most significant parts are * the inclusion of Stephen's error-handling work, which is designed to remount the fs read-only in the presence of software and hardware errors, rather than forcing a panic. * Stephen's fix for the journal_revoke assertion
2001 Aug 12
3
ext3-2.4-0.9.6
Patch against linux-2.4.8 is at http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/ext3/ The only changes here are merging up to 2.4.8 and the bigendian fix. linux-2.4.8-ac1 currently has ext3-0.9.3 which has no known crash-worthy bugs, but is old. I'm about to send Alan a diff which takes -ac up to 0.9.6. The changes between 0.9.3 and 0.9.6 may be summarised as: - Simplify the handling of
2001 Aug 08
5
BUG: Assertion failure with ext3-0.95 for 2.4.7
Hello ext3-users, I tested ext3 on a Linux for S/390 with several stress and benchmark test tests and faced a kernel bug message. The console showed the following output: Message from syslogd@boeaet34 at Fri Aug 3 11:34:16 2001 ... boeaet34 kernel: Assertion failure in journal_forget() at transaction.c:1184: "! jh->b_committed_data" I tried the Patch from
2001 Aug 23
2
EXT3 Trouble on 2.4.4
All, I know that there is no official port to Kernel 2.4.4, thus I may not get any help, however I am hoping someone could point me in the right direction for my problem. I am currently forced to use kernel 2.4.4 for reasons out of my control (embedded board). Here are the exact versions of everything I'm running: ExT3 Version: ext3-2.4-0.9.6-248 Util Version: util-linux-2.11f.tar.bz2 e2fs
2013 Mar 18
0
[linux-linus test] 17325: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass
flight 17325 linux-linus real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/17325/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl 9 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 12557 test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 15 guest-stop fail REGR. vs. 12557 test-amd64-i386-xl 15 guest-stop
2013 Mar 29
0
[linux-linus test] 17454: regressions - FAIL
flight 17454 linux-linus real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/17454/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-pair 17 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 12557 Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd 7 redhat-install fail
2013 Apr 10
0
[linux-linus test] 17612: regressions - FAIL
flight 17612 linux-linus real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/17612/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-pair 17 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 12557 Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 9 guest-start.2 fail
2013 May 05
0
[linux-linus test] 17901: regressions - FAIL
flight 17901 linux-linus real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/17901/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 12557 test-amd64-i386-pv 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 12557 test-amd64-amd64-pv 4
2013 May 07
0
[linux-linus test] 17916: regressions - FAIL
flight 17916 linux-linus real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/17916/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-pv 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 12557 test-amd64-amd64-xl 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 12557 test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 4
2013 Jun 16
0
[linux-linus test] 18150: regressions - FAIL
flight 18150 linux-linus real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/18150/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 7 redhat-install fail REGR. vs. 12557 test-amd64-i386-pair 17 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 12557 Regressions which are regarded as
2013 Jun 23
0
[linux-linus test] 18181: regressions - trouble: broken/fail/pass
flight 18181 linux-linus real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/18181/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 7 redhat-install fail REGR. vs. 12557 test-amd64-i386-pair 17 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 12557 Regressions which are regarded as
2013 Aug 29
0
[linux-linus test] 18805: regressions - FAIL
flight 18805 linux-linus real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/18805/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 7 redhat-install fail REGR. vs. 12557 test-amd64-i386-pair 17 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 12557 Regressions which are regarded as
2013 Aug 29
0
[linux-linus test] 18844: regressions - FAIL
flight 18844 linux-linus real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/18844/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 12557 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 9 guest-start fail