Displaying 20 results from an estimated 58 matches for "trigerring".
Did you mean:
trigering
2006 Apr 11
0
[Bug 469] New: recent match doesn't triger with --hitcount > 20
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=469
Summary: recent match doesn't triger with --hitcount > 20
Product: netfilter/iptables
Version: linux-2.6.x
Platform: i386
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ip_tables (kernel)
AssignedTo:
2006 Apr 12
1
[Bug 469] recent match doesn't triger with --hitcount > 20
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=469
netfilter@linuxace.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
2006 Aug 10
7
Radio Button events
Hi,
I have observers for a group of radio buttons, an observe_field for each
radio button (I think its not possible to have one observe_field for a
group of radio buttons).
Now, the problem is that when I click on one radio button, all the
observers get trigerred, so the method which the observe_field calls
gets the wrong result. I just want that method to get the radio button
that is
2005 Mar 16
2
AGI kill
Hello.
When the caller hangup the phone, asterisk kills my AGI python script without
notification.
I caught all signals, but none was trigered.
How can i trap this event to resume some operations.
Sorry for my poor english :)
Thanks.
2009 Jan 13
3
[LLVMdev] Possible bug in LiveIntervals (triggered on the XCore target)?
Hi again,
Now, after I fixed the graph coloring regalloc bug that was triggered
by the ARM target, I continue testing and found another bug, this time
on the XCore target. First I thought that it is again specific to my
register allocator, but it seems to be trigerred also by LLVM's
linearscan register allocator.
I don't know if the XCore target is stable enough in LLVM, or may be I
2006 May 08
2
inPlaceEditor and onClick Event
Hi all. I have specific situation that I want to made element to be edited in place (i mean I want to wrapped that element Ajax.InPlaceElenment) but i want that inplaceeditor be triggered not clicked in that element but in the other element. e.g. there are two divs and first I want to be inplaced editor but this inplaced editor should be trigerred when i clicked in second divs. How to do it nice?
2015 Nov 16
2
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: Fix pre-nv50 pageflip events
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 04:45:00PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 31.10.2015 06:55, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank
> > period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in
> >
> > commit af4870e406126b7ac0ae7c7ce5751f25ebe60f28
> > Author: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com>
>
2011 Feb 18
1
[LLVMdev] Enforcing execution order of passes
I'd like to run my own passes (implemented as .so) via the opt tool on a
linked bitcode.
>opt -load=my_own_pass.so -do_my_passes ... test.bc > test.output.bc
However, my passes require other LLVM's passes before and after. For
example, the ordering of passes that I want:
(1) A couple of LLVM's passes ==> (2) my_loop_pass ==> (3) my_module_pass
==> (4) Other
2007 Apr 26
2
mouse event handling
Hi all,
I have difficulty understanding WxRuby / WxWidgets event handling,
hoping someone here can lend us some light.
Im writing a simple gui app where I need to receive mouse click events
from the shapes drawn on a canvas (a simple object inheriting from
ScrolledWindow, as seen in many examples). Shapes arent buttons so I
think I''ll need to be checking the coordinates to be able to
2023 Mar 28
2
9p regression (Was: [PATCH v2] virtio_ring: don't update event idx on get_buf)
Hi Michael, Albert,
Albert Huang wrote on Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 06:56:33PM +0800:
> in virtio_net, if we disable the napi_tx, when we triger a tx interrupt,
> the vq->event_triggered will be set to true. It will no longer be set to
> false. Unless we explicitly call virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed or
> virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare.
This patch (commited as 35395770f803
2009 Jan 13
0
[LLVMdev] Possible bug in LiveIntervals (triggered on the XCore target)?
Roman Levenstein wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Now, after I fixed the graph coloring regalloc bug that was triggered
> by the ARM target, I continue testing and found another bug, this time
> on the XCore target. First I thought that it is again specific to my
> register allocator, but it seems to be trigerred also by LLVM's
> linearscan register allocator.
>
> I don't
2015 Jul 31
2
EFI: ipxe + syslinux = Failed to read blocks: 0xC
> Some magic in dhcpd.conf:
>
> if option architecture-type = 00:09 {
> filename "efi64/syslinux-87020-or.efi";
> option pxelinux.pathprefix "http://bla/efi64/";
> } elsif option
> architecture-type = 00:07 {
> filename "efi64/ipxe-git87981.efi";
> } else {
> filename
2009 Jan 14
2
[LLVMdev] Possible bug in LiveIntervals (triggered on the XCore target)?
On Jan 13, 2009, at 11:20 AM, Richard Osborne <richard at xmos.com> wrote:
> Roman Levenstein wrote:
>> Hi again,
>>
>> Now, after I fixed the graph coloring regalloc bug that was triggered
>> by the ARM target, I continue testing and found another bug, this
>> time
>> on the XCore target. First I thought that it is again specific to my
>>
2015 Nov 09
2
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: Fix pre-nv50 pageflip events (v2)
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank
period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in
commit af4870e406126b7ac0ae7c7ce5751f25ebe60f28
Author: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com>
Date: Tue May 13 00:42:08 2014 +0200
drm/nouveau/kms/nv04-nv40: fix pageflip events via special case.
2015 Dec 01
2
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: Fix pre-nv50 pageflip events
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 04:08:16PM +0100, poma wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 04:45:00PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> >> On 31.10.2015 06:55, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> > Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank
> >> > period. Therefore that
2015 Nov 10
2
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: Fix pre-nv50 pageflip events (v3)
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank
period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in
commit af4870e406126b7ac0ae7c7ce5751f25ebe60f28
Author: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com>
Date: Tue May 13 00:42:08 2014 +0200
drm/nouveau/kms/nv04-nv40: fix pageflip events via special case.
2015 Oct 30
5
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: Fix pre-nv50 pageflip events
Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank
period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in
commit af4870e406126b7ac0ae7c7ce5751f25ebe60f28
Author: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com>
Date: Tue May 13 00:42:08 2014 +0200
drm/nouveau/kms/nv04-nv40: fix pageflip events via special case.
Unfortunately that hack got uprooted in
commit
2015 Nov 10
2
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: Fix pre-nv50 pageflip events (v3)
On 11/10/2015 05:00 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 03:54:52PM +0100, Mario Kleiner wrote:
>> From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
>>
>> Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank
>> period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in
>>
>> commit af4870e406126b7ac0ae7c7ce5751f25ebe60f28
2009 Jan 29
9
Callback / Camp / Extention Free notify?
Hi,
I am trying to implement the callback feature of our old phone system.
This feature may go by a different name in asterisk?
It worked as follows. If phone A called phone B and it was BUSY, you
press a button to enable a callback.
User A is free to continue work or make other calls.
What this meant is that when both phones became free, phone A would
ring, on answer it would call phone B
2023 Mar 24
1
[External] Re: [PATCH] virtio_ring: Suppress tx interrupt when napi_tx disable
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 4:01?PM ?? <huangjie.albert at bytedance.com> wrote:
>
> Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> ?2023?3?22??? 10:37???
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 5:00?PM Albert Huang
> > <huangjie.albert at bytedance.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: "huangjie.albert" <huangjie.albert at bytedance.com>
> > >