search for: trigerring

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 58 matches for "trigerring".

Did you mean: trigering
2006 Apr 11
0
[Bug 469] New: recent match doesn't triger with --hitcount > 20
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=469 Summary: recent match doesn't triger with --hitcount > 20 Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ip_tables (kernel) AssignedTo:
2006 Apr 12
1
[Bug 469] recent match doesn't triger with --hitcount > 20
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=469 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|
2006 Aug 10
7
Radio Button events
Hi, I have observers for a group of radio buttons, an observe_field for each radio button (I think its not possible to have one observe_field for a group of radio buttons). Now, the problem is that when I click on one radio button, all the observers get trigerred, so the method which the observe_field calls gets the wrong result. I just want that method to get the radio button that is
2005 Mar 16
2
AGI kill
Hello. When the caller hangup the phone, asterisk kills my AGI python script without notification. I caught all signals, but none was trigered. How can i trap this event to resume some operations. Sorry for my poor english :) Thanks.
2009 Jan 13
3
[LLVMdev] Possible bug in LiveIntervals (triggered on the XCore target)?
Hi again, Now, after I fixed the graph coloring regalloc bug that was triggered by the ARM target, I continue testing and found another bug, this time on the XCore target. First I thought that it is again specific to my register allocator, but it seems to be trigerred also by LLVM's linearscan register allocator. I don't know if the XCore target is stable enough in LLVM, or may be I
2006 May 08
2
inPlaceEditor and onClick Event
Hi all. I have specific situation that I want to made element to be edited in place (i mean I want to wrapped that element Ajax.InPlaceElenment) but i want that inplaceeditor be triggered not clicked in that element but in the other element. e.g. there are two divs and first I want to be inplaced editor but this inplaced editor should be trigerred when i clicked in second divs. How to do it nice?
2015 Nov 16
2
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: Fix pre-nv50 pageflip events
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 04:45:00PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On 31.10.2015 06:55, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank > > period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in > > > > commit af4870e406126b7ac0ae7c7ce5751f25ebe60f28 > > Author: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com> >
2011 Feb 18
1
[LLVMdev] Enforcing execution order of passes
I'd like to run my own passes (implemented as .so) via the opt tool on a linked bitcode. >opt -load=my_own_pass.so -do_my_passes ... test.bc > test.output.bc However, my passes require other LLVM's passes before and after. For example, the ordering of passes that I want: (1) A couple of LLVM's passes ==> (2) my_loop_pass ==> (3) my_module_pass ==> (4) Other
2007 Apr 26
2
mouse event handling
Hi all, I have difficulty understanding WxRuby / WxWidgets event handling, hoping someone here can lend us some light. Im writing a simple gui app where I need to receive mouse click events from the shapes drawn on a canvas (a simple object inheriting from ScrolledWindow, as seen in many examples). Shapes arent buttons so I think I''ll need to be checking the coordinates to be able to
2023 Mar 28
2
9p regression (Was: [PATCH v2] virtio_ring: don't update event idx on get_buf)
Hi Michael, Albert, Albert Huang wrote on Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 06:56:33PM +0800: > in virtio_net, if we disable the napi_tx, when we triger a tx interrupt, > the vq->event_triggered will be set to true. It will no longer be set to > false. Unless we explicitly call virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed or > virtqueue_enable_cb_prepare. This patch (commited as 35395770f803
2009 Jan 13
0
[LLVMdev] Possible bug in LiveIntervals (triggered on the XCore target)?
Roman Levenstein wrote: > Hi again, > > Now, after I fixed the graph coloring regalloc bug that was triggered > by the ARM target, I continue testing and found another bug, this time > on the XCore target. First I thought that it is again specific to my > register allocator, but it seems to be trigerred also by LLVM's > linearscan register allocator. > > I don't
2015 Jul 31
2
EFI: ipxe + syslinux = Failed to read blocks: 0xC
> Some magic in dhcpd.conf: > > if option architecture-type = 00:09 { > filename "efi64/syslinux-87020-or.efi"; > option pxelinux.pathprefix "http://bla/efi64/"; > } elsif option > architecture-type = 00:07 { > filename "efi64/ipxe-git87981.efi"; > } else { > filename
2009 Jan 14
2
[LLVMdev] Possible bug in LiveIntervals (triggered on the XCore target)?
On Jan 13, 2009, at 11:20 AM, Richard Osborne <richard at xmos.com> wrote: > Roman Levenstein wrote: >> Hi again, >> >> Now, after I fixed the graph coloring regalloc bug that was triggered >> by the ARM target, I continue testing and found another bug, this >> time >> on the XCore target. First I thought that it is again specific to my >>
2015 Nov 09
2
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: Fix pre-nv50 pageflip events (v2)
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in commit af4870e406126b7ac0ae7c7ce5751f25ebe60f28 Author: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com> Date: Tue May 13 00:42:08 2014 +0200 drm/nouveau/kms/nv04-nv40: fix pageflip events via special case.
2015 Dec 01
2
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: Fix pre-nv50 pageflip events
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 04:08:16PM +0100, poma wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 04:45:00PM +0900, Michel Dänzer wrote: > >> On 31.10.2015 06:55, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> > Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank > >> > period. Therefore that
2015 Nov 10
2
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: Fix pre-nv50 pageflip events (v3)
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in commit af4870e406126b7ac0ae7c7ce5751f25ebe60f28 Author: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com> Date: Tue May 13 00:42:08 2014 +0200 drm/nouveau/kms/nv04-nv40: fix pageflip events via special case.
2015 Oct 30
5
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: Fix pre-nv50 pageflip events
Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in commit af4870e406126b7ac0ae7c7ce5751f25ebe60f28 Author: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de at gmail.com> Date: Tue May 13 00:42:08 2014 +0200 drm/nouveau/kms/nv04-nv40: fix pageflip events via special case. Unfortunately that hack got uprooted in commit
2015 Nov 10
2
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: Fix pre-nv50 pageflip events (v3)
On 11/10/2015 05:00 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 03:54:52PM +0100, Mario Kleiner wrote: >> From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> >> >> Apparently pre-nv50 pageflip events happen before the actual vblank >> period. Therefore that functionality got semi-disabled in >> >> commit af4870e406126b7ac0ae7c7ce5751f25ebe60f28
2009 Jan 29
9
Callback / Camp / Extention Free notify?
Hi, I am trying to implement the callback feature of our old phone system. This feature may go by a different name in asterisk? It worked as follows. If phone A called phone B and it was BUSY, you press a button to enable a callback. User A is free to continue work or make other calls. What this meant is that when both phones became free, phone A would ring, on answer it would call phone B
2023 Mar 24
1
[External] Re: [PATCH] virtio_ring: Suppress tx interrupt when napi_tx disable
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 4:01?PM ?? <huangjie.albert at bytedance.com> wrote: > > Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> ?2023?3?22??? 10:37??? > > > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 5:00?PM Albert Huang > > <huangjie.albert at bytedance.com> wrote: > > > > > > From: "huangjie.albert" <huangjie.albert at bytedance.com> > > >