search for: trickled

Someone for the love of go must have a answer for this.. :) Im so needing to trickle a few games/apps running under wine.. Anyone got any ideas?

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 8:57 AM, Sam McLeod <mailinglists at smcleod.net> wrote: > Hi Raghavendra, > > > On 20 Mar 2018, at 1:55 pm, Raghavendra Gowdappa <rgowdapp at redhat.com> > wrote: > > Aggregating large number of small writes by write-behind into large writes > has been merged on master: > https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/364 > >

Hi Raghavendra, > On 20 Mar 2018, at 1:55 pm, Raghavendra Gowdappa <rgowdapp at redhat.com> wrote: > > Aggregating large number of small writes by write-behind into large writes has been merged on master: > https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/364 <https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/364> > > Would like to know whether it helps for this usecase.

Excellent description, thank you. With performance.write-behind-trickling-writes ON (default): ## 4k randwrite # fio --randrepeat=1 --ioengine=libaio --gtod_reduce=1 --name=test --filename=test --bs=4k --iodepth=32 --size=256MB --readwrite=randwrite test: (g=0): rw=randwrite, bs=(R) 4096B-4096B, (W) 4096B-4096B, (T) 4096B-4096B, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=32 fio-3.1 Starting 1 process Jobs: 1

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 1:55 AM, TomK <tomkcpr at mdevsys.com> wrote: > On 3/19/2018 10:52 AM, Rik Theys wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On 03/19/2018 03:42 PM, TomK wrote: >> >>> On 3/19/2018 5:42 AM, Ondrej Valousek wrote: >>> Removing NFS or NFS Ganesha from the equation, not very impressed on my >>> own setup either. For the writes

Hi all, I was just wondering when this update will trickle down into the Centos repo: http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0611.html Obviously, it just came out yesterday, so I'm not expecting it to suddenly appear. ;) Just curious what the turn around time usually is for RHEL bug fixes that get released and when we should expect it. As a side note, does anyone know if there is a way

I keep seeing 'Joe Average compromised computer on broadband' being used to do email dictionary attacks on our systems. Seems I always have several domains going through these. One in particular has been in the 'a-' list for weeks with about 20,000 attempts per day from various systems. Yeah, I do have a system which blocks email from these systems for a period of time after 3

I read this in a previous post ( http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/mongrel-users/2006-December/002354.html) .... First, Mongrel accepts remote clients and creates one Thread for each request. Mongrel also enforces a single request/response using Connect:close headers because Ruby only supports 1024 files (so far). If Mongrel doesn''t do this then people like yourself can write a simple

Warren Young wrote: > No, I am making the assumption that the vast majority of CentOS installs > are racked up in datacenters, VPS hosts, etc. Is that true, I wonder? For some reason Fedora and CentOS seem reluctant to find out anything about their users (or what their users want). Is anything known about the ratio of RHEL to CentOS machines? -- Timothy Murphy gayleard /at/

Say we have 20k-50k users signed up for an email newsletter. Does anyone have any data on how well ActionMailer does with mass emails? How long would that take to send? Anything I should watch out for? Thanks, Joe

On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 19:10, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > Can you point to examples of that - where Phab links have been used to express non-mechanically-dependent patches? Not at the top of my head, but since that's not what we're talking about, I'll go to the next point. > Approval order isn't commit order - I'm more than happy to approve a

On Wed, 24 May, Todd A. Green wrote: I've been working with smbfs/smbmount the last few weeks to allow my linux log processing server access to the logs on our NT servers. The problem is that after a period of time all the smbfs mounts become invalid with either one of two errors. Yes. I have exactly the same thing. 'Mount' shows them still mounted, but 'ls -l' on the

On Aug 6, 2019, at 7:04 AM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 at 19:49, Warren Young <warren at etr-usa.com> wrote: > >> On Aug 5, 2019, at 11:25 AM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 at 13:17, Jerry Geis <jerry.geis at gmail.com> wrote:

More notes about diskrsync <https://github.com/dop251/diskrsync> : (0) It seems to work well and efficiently. The README.md now explains how to install it and it's a lot easier than the script I included in my last note would seem to indicate. (I didn't and still don't know Go.) (1) Effectively, inherently, and non-optionally, diskrsync has rsync's --inplace feature. IOW,

hello R-world, according to the strucchange package .pdf, "all procedures in this package are concerned with testing or assessing deviations from stability in the classical linear regression model." i'd like to test/assess deviations from stability in the Poisson model. is there a way to modify the strucchange package to suit my purposes, or should i use be using another

can the list admin's please stop this flood there is a backlog... great! how about it be dealt with? is the end near? how many emails can we expect? can this trickle of emails be accelerated so as to finish sooner? Dean

Conditionally rebuilding the transfer iso saved relatively little execution time, and was a trickling source of bugs. This change simply removes the shortcut code, which means that the transfer iso will always be rebuild. Resolves RHBZ#618965 --- lib/Sys/VirtV2V/Config.pm | 45 +-------------------------------------------- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) diff --git

Ok, I know this is a stupid question but im having problems with some shares and so I have to ask: Are share parameters specified within the [global] section used as defaults for my other shares, or are they ignored? For example, if I set veto oplock files = /*.DBM/*.dbm/ within the [global] section, will that trickle down to my shares if I don't have "veto oplock files"

I'm working on some data pipeline issues, and found some interesting results in comparing win2k vs samba. The volume being mounted is a NetApp 960. NetApp provides a way see the # of cifs operations on a given volume/qtree. So I compared how many ops are generated by copying a 12MB file ( a single 2k image ). The initial reasoning behind this testing was seeing if copying a file at the end

Looks like reports from the last month are trickling in. 170 of them in incoming, but there's a lot of spam. I hope Martin's spamfilters are less leaky that ours, so that they get killed en route to r-devel.... -- O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard ?ster Farimagsgade 5, Entr.B c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics PO Box 2099, 1014 Cph. K (*) \(*) -- University of