search for: treesort

...ound it being queried for values that didn't exist previously. Luckily there's a pass built into LLVM for catching such things, "Debug-AA", and I used that to confirm that GVN does this fairly frequently. I've attached a test case that triggers the bug (reduced from Stanford/Treesort, for whatever that's worth), this is on LLVM 2.7. Should this be filed as a bug....? Additionally it just seems.. /unfortunate/ that we have a pass specifically designed to catch bugs like this, yet it's not being used. Don't suppose this is something someone would feel motivated to...

...rce/Benchmarks/Dhrystone/fldry | * | * | SingleSource/Benchmarks/Dhrystone/dry | * | * | SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Quicksort | * | * | SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Treesort | * | * | SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Perm | * | * | SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/IntMM | * | * | SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Towers...

...iBench/security-rijndael/security-rijndael -7.9% SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/mandel-2 -6.2% MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/network-dijkstra/network-dijkstra -6.2% External/SPEC/CFP2006/447.dealII/447.dealII -5.7% MultiSource/Applications/JM/ldecod/ldecod -5.1% SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Treesort -5.0% MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/mst/mst -4.4% MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/18-imp/imp -4.4% External/SPEC/CFP2000/183.equake/183.equake -4.3% MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/network-patricia/network-patricia -4.3% MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-typeset/consumer-typeset -4.1% Extern...

...0 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Towers | 0.0189 7272 0.0327 * 0.0318 | 0.02 0.03 0.03 * 0.07 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Treesort | 0.0138 2348 0.0124 * 0.0124 | 0.15 0.15 0.15 * 0.18 | 1.00 1.00 n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C++/2003-05-14-array-init | 0.0019 528 0.0020 * 0.0020...

...0 * 0.03 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Towers | 0.0160 7708 0.0400 * 0.0400 | 0.03 0.04 0.05 * 0.12 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Treesort | 0.0160 2416 0.0120 * 0.0120 | 0.17 0.17 0.18 * 0.19 | 1.00 0.94 n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C++/2003-05-14-array-init | 0.0000 552 0.0040 * 0.0000...

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When

...0 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Towers | 0.0254 7700 0.0320 * 0.0303 | 0.02 0.03 0.03 * 0.07 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Treesort | 0.0156 2412 0.0151 * 0.0106 | 0.16 0.17 0.18 * 0.19 | 0.94 0.89 n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C++/2003-05-14-array-init | 0.0026 536 0.0016 * 0.0015...

...0 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Towers | 0.0084 8096 0.0172 * 0.0177 | 0.01 0.01 0.02 * 0.05 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Treesort | 0.0067 2468 0.0058 * 0.0057 | 0.07 0.06 0.07 * 0.09 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C++/2003-05-14-array-init | 0.0007 552 0.0011 * 0.0011...

...|0.000553031| -2.02| 1637284| 0|0.000540962| 0.17| 1637284| 0| |SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Towers.test | 512|0.006855776| 69265251|0.006841316| 0.21| 69265247| 0|0.006845202| 0.15| 69265247| 0| |SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Treesort.test | 330|0.045405366| 164531268|0.045481322| -0.17| 164531263| 0|0.045384358| 0.05| 164531263| 0| |------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------|-----------|-----------|-----------|------|-----------|------|-----...

....01 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Towers                                  | > 0.0200 2440     0.0200      *                0.0200      |    0.04    0.04 >  0.03 *           0.05 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Treesort                                | > 0.0100 2248     0.0200      *                0.0200      |    0.10    0.10 >  0.08 *           0.11 | 1.00    -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Regression/C++/2003-05-14-array-init                        | > 0.0000 584      0.0000      *        ...

Hi Tanya, > 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects > directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a > pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories. Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu. > 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note > that you need to

...n/a n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/ > Towers | 0.0200 2440 > 0.0200 * 0.0200 | 0.04 0.04 0.03 > * 0.05 | - - n/a n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/ > Treesort | 0.0100 2248 > 0.0200 * 0.0200 | 0.10 0.10 0.08 > * 0.11 | 1.00 - n/a n/a > SingleSource/Regression/C++/2003-05-14-array- > init | 0.0000 584 0.0000...

...gt; 1.74% 0.0634 0.0645 0.0001 > MultiSource/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan.compile > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/graph?pset.0=on&test.MultiSource%2FApplications%2FClamAV%2Fclamscan.compile=on> > 1.73% 15.1030 15.3645 0.0138 > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Treesort.compile > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/graph?pset.0=on&test.SingleSource%2FBenchmarks%2FStanford%2FTreesort.compile=on> > 1.72% 0.0465 0.0473 0.0002 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/McCat/08-main/main.compile > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/grap...

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download

LLVMers, 2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community. http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. To test llvm-gcc: 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre- compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. 2) Run make check,

LLVMers, The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. Please do the following: 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can). 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log 3) Run "make

Hi Stepan, Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to improve MergeFunctions. Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its capability

...18520 0 0.01 18520 trace.ll 11 34795 0 0.01 34779 0 0.01 34779 traits.ll 7 25582 0 0.01 25563 0 0.01 25563 tramp3d-v4.ll 9738 17955754 2880 4.83 17589374 * * * transform8x8.ll 12 491518 0 0.04 491497 0 0.05 491497 trans.ll 9 27788 0 0.01 27767 0 0.01 27767 tree.ll 29 75173 0 0.02 75143 0 0.01 75143 Treesort.ll 8 20035 0 0.01 20016 0 0.01 20016 Triang.ll 4 30696 0 0.01 30674 0 0.01 30674 trie.ll 12 33266 0 0.01 33243 0 0.01 33243 trig.ll 9 38056 0 0.01 38033 0 0.01 38242 trim.ll 7 106745 0 0.02 106729 0 0.02 106729 trisolv.ll 12 21126 0 0.01 21075 0 0.01 21075 trmm.ll 12 21556 0 0.01 21508 0 0.01 21508...